Many hospitals are moving towards creating mandatory influenza vaccination policies as a condition of employment. Such mandates are causing surefire responses on both sides of the fence. What is the push behind the movement, and what is causing the pushback?
Updated:
First, let me just go over some of the symptoms of the flu, and then we will get down to business on the controversy surrounding the push to create mandatory flu vaccines for healthcare workers:
I can't think of anyone who wants any of these symptoms, or to come down with the flu, can you?
Influenza vaccination research has clearly documented the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine (Google it - you will find a plethora of information...however, I will list some links at the end of this article for your information). However, even though there is sufficient evidence to prove the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine, vaccination rates among healthcare workers are pitifully low. In 2013, only 55% of nurses in the frontlines were vaccinated.
Organizations such as The Joint Commission, the American Nurses Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Centers for Disease Control, Healthy People 2020, etc., etc., have stated their position on recommending the flu vaccine for healthcare workers in order to decrease the risk of exposure and reduce deaths. Due to this recommendation, many healthcare facilities are now creating mandatory flu vaccine policies as a condition of employment.
Employers who create mandatory policies will have exemptions, of course. Exemptions are made for medical and religious exceptions. For places that do not have a mandatory flu vaccine, they may "strongly recommend" the vaccination and may have a declination form for employees to submit if they refuse the vaccine. Additionally, some employers will enforce refusers to wear a mask during flu season while they are at work in order to protect the patients and the employee.
Evidence has shown that there are more than 36,000 deaths in the US each year related to influenza, and more than 200,000 hospitalizations. Influenza is the 6th leading cause of death. Healthcare workers are the leading cause of influenza outbreaks in the healthcare system. up to 50% of people who are infected by the flu virus do not fill ill for several days and can spread the virus to people at risk of complications and death from the flu. Additionally, evidence shows vaccination decreases mortality by 40%, decreases the spread of nosocomial infections by 43%, and decreases absenteeism by 20-30%.
Additionally, there is the ethics to consider. As healthcare workers, we have all taken an oath to "do no harm". As a nurse caring for patients who are not in their most physically healthy state, do we take the vaccination in order to prevent spreading the flu to our vulnerable patients, in order to "do no harm"? We must consider this when we make our decision to take or refuse the vaccination.
I have the names of a few hospitals, and this is by no means a comprehensive list. This is based on a ListServe survey of hospitals and these are the responses received:
Refusal may be largely due to misconceptions related to the vaccine. Fears that the immune system will cause them to get the flu, beliefs that hygiene and better nutrition are more helpful than the vaccine, fear of needles, beliefs that the vaccine does not work, and fear of side effects. Others believe that they have a constitutional right to refuse the vaccine and that mandatory policies are violating these rights.
(taken from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health outline of flu vaccine talking points for managers)
The flu shot does not give people the flu. It uses inactivated ("dead") virus. People may still catch a cold or other virus that the vaccine is not designed match.
Studies have shown that flu vaccination prevents flu in 70% to 90% of healthy adults younger than 65 years old.
You need a new vaccine every year - the virus changes over time.
Serious adverse reactions are very rare. They are explained on the CDC's Vaccine Information Statement, which is distributed when the vaccine is administered.
Local short-term reactions - such soreness at the vaccination site, slight fever, achy feeling - may occur but usually do not last long. Over the counter medicines are helpful. Even short-term reactions are much less bothersome than catching the flu and feeling very sick for days.
Your patients are at-risk, and possibly some friends and family members. You can be infected with the flu virus but not feel ill - and can still transmit flu to at-risk patients.
Inactivated influenza vaccine is effective in preventing transmission and reducing complications of the flu. In years when there is a close match between the vaccine and circulating virus strains, the vaccine prevents illness among approximately 70%--90% of healthy adults under 65 years of age. Vaccinating healthy adults also has been proven to lead to decreased work absenteeism and use of health-care resources, including use of antibiotics. Strong protection is also expected when the vaccine is not a close match with circulating strains, with 50%--77% effectiveness in these instances. In addition, effectiveness against influenza-related hospitalization for healthy adults from inactivated vaccine is estimated at 90%.
All healthcare facilities will be facing the choice of creating a mandatory influenza vaccination in the near future, if they have not already. In order to make an informed decision on the topic, we must have information. Knowledge is power. Before you make a blanket statement on pros or cons, have the information you need, know the research, and make an educated decision.
Please respond to this article by answering the following questions:
References
American Association of Family Practitioners. (2011). AAFP supports mandatory flu vaccinations for healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: AAFP Supports Mandatory Flu Vaccinations for Health Care Personnel
ATrain. (2014). To accept or refuse the flu vaccine. Retrieved from: ZZZ_133_Influenza: Module 7
CDC. (2014). Vaccination: Who should do it, who should not and who should take precautions. Retrieved from: Vaccination: Who Should Do It, Who Should Not and Who Should Take Precautions | Seasonal Influenza (Flu) | CDC
Influenza Action Coalition. (2015). Influenza vaccination honor roll. Retrieved from: Honor Roll: Mandatory Influenza Vaccination Policies for Healthcare Personnel
Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. (2014). Talking points for managers. Retrieved from: http://tinyurl.com/p6nbg2u
National adult and influenza immunization summit. (2015). Vaccinating healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: Vaccinating Healthcare Personnel - National Adult and Influenza Immunization Summit
NursingTimes. (2014). Why do health workers decline flu vaccination? Retrieved from: http://www.nursingtimes.net/Journals/2014/11/28/y/k/x/031214-Why-do-health-workers-decline-flu-vaccination.pdf
TJC. (2012). R3 Report: Requirement, rationale, reference. Retrieved from: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/R3_Report_Issue_3_5_18_12_final.pdf
Such an ignorant comment. I know and have witnessed PERSONALLY individuals that ended up having severe reactions including facial paralysis.
welcome to AN, I see this is your first post.
Do you understand the difference between correlation and causation? And what science based medicine and evidence based practice means? If so then you understand why things you think you have seen personally have no place in practice. If all medical professionals practiced based on what we have seen in our personal lives, and not what is proven to work, it would be an utter disaster. "I think" and "I feel" have no place in science based medicine.
Yes I understand the difference between correlation and causation and truthfully I do not appreciate your reply. Either you are a new grad who has not has much exposure/experience or you haven't had a patient who's had the Guillain-Barré syndrome as a result from a vaccine. You're just wasting my time. Talk to me when you get your MSN...welcome to AN, I see this is your first post.Do you understand the difference between correlation and causation? And what science based medicine and evidence based practice means? If so then you understand why things you think you have seen personally have no place in practice. If all medical professionals practiced based on what we have seen in our personal lives, and not what is proven to work, it would be an utter disaster. "I think" and "I feel" have no place in science based medicine.
Yes I understand the difference between correlation and causation and truthfully I do not appreciate your reply. Either you are a new grad who has not has much exposure/experience or you haven't had a patient who's had the Guillain-Barré syndrome as a result from a vaccine. You're just wasting my time. Talk to me when you get your MSN...
So, you have chosen to attack me personally and question my education and experience instead of supporting your opinion? Perfect. If being asked to back up your claim is waste of time, why are you posting?
Yes I understand the difference between correlation and causation and truthfully I do not appreciate your reply. Either you are a new grad who has not has much exposure/experience or you haven't had a patient who's had the Guillain-Barré syndrome as a result from a vaccine. You're just wasting my time. Talk to me when you get your MSN...
I have an MSN -- does that mean I'm allowed to speak? GBS is a horrible condition, but the chance that anyone has developed "the" GBS as a "result" of a vaccine is extremely slim. If we're speaking specifically of the flu shot, the risk of getting GBS from having the flu is significantly higher than the risk of getting it from having the flu shot.
Vaccines and Guillain-Barré syndrome. - PubMed - NCBI
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(13)70104-X/abstract
Guillain-Barre Syndrome Concerns | Vaccine Safety | CDC
Risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome after measles-mumps-rubella vaccination
Yes I understand the difference between correlation and causation and truthfully I do not appreciate your reply. Either you are a new grad who has not has much exposure/experience or you haven't had a patient who's had the Guillain-Barré syndrome as a result from a vaccine. You're just wasting my time. Talk to me when you get your MSN...
Apparently you have never taken care of a patient who's had the GBS as a result of an infection, possibly secondary to influenza? That would actually be the more likely scenario.
Are you under some misimpression that only nurses with a Masters degree can post on AN or are capable of understanding the science behind vaccination policy? Or are you simply above interacting with someone who might be practicing nursing with a BS or ADN?
To clarify, this was a personal response based on my opinions, research and experiences. I'm actually not anti-vaccine and believe it is everyone's right to make their own decisions for themselves (just as in any other aspect of life). Us vs. them, pro vs "antivaxxers"? This binary thinking is a bit too simple for my taste. The topic of vaccines is far more complicated than for vs. against and far more multifaceted than a set of verbatim talking points hijacked from a mainstream news source that is likely intertwined with those whose financial interests vaccination incentives serves.
Are you mad about being asked or not being asked?
I'm not mad at anything. I was simply pointing out that asking a yes or no question and subsequently asking for elaboration for only one of those two possible answers constitutes a form of bias built into a survey response. Personally, I am interested in better understanding why individuals choose to get vaccinated for the flu beyond employer requirements.
Personally, I am interested in better understanding why individuals choose to get vaccinated for the flu beyond employer requirements.
So my chances of getting sick with influenza is lessened. Simple as that.
I don't want to get the flu.
My husband and my son get flu shots as well and they have no requirement to do so.
Which unsafe compounds are you specifically concerned with?Sola dosis facit venenum. I know, its sooooo 1490s, but it still holds true today.
I will use the example of the flu vaccine offered by my employer - Fluzone. The ingredients I am most concerned with are the formaldehyde and thimerosal. Yes, I understand, the dose makes the poison. My opinion is that if something is a known toxin or carcinogen and can cause serious harm or death to people in a larger dose, should I be completely unconcerned with introducing a smaller dose to my system? People have different responses to this question which I respect but for me it's a no.
I will use the example of the flu vaccine offered by my employer - Fluzone. The ingredients I am most concerned with are the formaldehyde and thimerosal. Yes, I understand, the dose makes the poison. My opinion is that if something is a known toxin or carcinogen and can cause serious harm or death to people in a larger dose, should I be completely unconcerned with introducing a smaller dose to my system? People have different responses to this question which I respect but for me it's a no.
The multi-dose vial is the one with the preservative Thimerosal. Both of the places where I work had individual syringes filled with the vaccine and no one used a multi-dose vial. So check to see how your place of work is giving the injection.
Thimerosal has been removed from or reduced to trace amounts in all vaccines routinely recommended for children 6 years of age and younger, with the exception of inactivated influenza vaccine (see Table 1). A preservative-free version of the inactivated influenza vaccine (contains trace amounts of thimerosal) is available in limited supply at this time for use in infants, children and pregnant women. Some vaccines such as Td, which is indicated for older children (≥ 7 years of age) and adults, are also now available in formulations that are free of thimerosal or contain only trace amounts. Vaccines with trace amounts of thimerosal contain 1 microgram or less of mercury per dose.
As to Formaldehyde - again, trace amounts in vaccines not found to be toxic.
Formaldehyde is a one-carbon, highly water-soluble aldehyde that is used in certain vaccines to inactivate viruses and to detoxify bacterial toxins. As part of the manufacturing process, some residual formaldehyde can remain behind in vaccines at levels less than or equal to 0.02%. Environmental and occupational exposure, principally by inhalation, is a continuing risk assessment focus for formaldehyde. However, exposure to formaldehyde via vaccine administration is qualitatively and quantitatively different from environmental or occupational settings and calls for a different perspective and approach to risk assessment. As part of a rigorous and ongoing process of evaluating the safety of biological products throughout their lifecycle at the FDA, we performed an assessment of formaldehyde in infant vaccines, in which estimates of the concentrations of formaldehyde in blood and total body water following exposure to formaldehyde-containing vaccines at a single medical visit were compared with endogenous background levels of formaldehyde in a model 2-month-old infant. Formaldehyde levels were estimated using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of formaldehyde disposition following intramuscular (IM) injection. Model results indicated that following a single dose of 200µg, formaldehyde is essentially completely removed from the site of injection within 30min. Assuming metabolism at the site of injection only, peak concentrations of formaldehyde in blood/total body water were estimated to be 22µg/L, which is equivalent to a body burden of 66µg or
The multi-dose vial is the one with the preservative Thimerosal. Both of the places where I work had individual syringes filled with the vaccine and no one used a multi-dose vial. So check to see how your place of work is giving the injection.As to Formaldehyde - again, trace amounts in vaccines not found to be toxic.
Spidey's mom, I appreciate your perspective about why you choose to vaccinate yourself and your family as well as the information you have provided. I am aware that formaldehyde is included in trace amounts and that mercury is included in the multi-dose formulation only. My employer uses the multi-dose formulation for staff and patients alike though I know I could easily go elsewhere and get a thimerasol-free version at minimal cost. I am not here to disagree with the information the FDA provides. What I would like to see is greater accountability when it comes to real adverse effects, disabilities and deaths that have occurred as a result of the flu vaccine and many others.
JustMeRN
238 Posts
Noted. I think maybe it's time to also remind posters that it is against TOS to offer medical advice on these boards. Telling someone to take "natural" lithium for their neurological disorder, or encouraging vit c, d and fish oil over a flu shot would be considered offering medical advice, IMO.