Techs should never have been starting IVs to begin with, unless they are also EMT-I or EMT-P certified. It is not in their scope of practice, and if something happened becasue of one of those IV starts, they wouldn't have a leg to stand on..........It is the RNs responsibility.................
Must be your hospital Angie, at mine in the ED the techs start IV's all the time. Course all have four important intials after their name EMT-P.
Now for the wierd, worked at one hospital in Michigan in 98-99 that the techs could start IV's if they hung fluid ie NS, D5 ect, but if it was a saline lock that was "a med" and could not start those.
Rj:rolleyes:
Must be your hospital Angie, at mine in the ED the techs start IV's all the time. Course all have four important intials after their name EMT-P.Now for the wierd, worked at one hospital in Michigan in 98-99 that the techs could start IV's if they hung fluid ie NS, D5 ect, but if it was a saline lock that was "a med" and could not start those.
Rj:rolleyes:
Our "techs" are CNA's . . . the EMT-II and medics who work in the ER start IV's in the ER but it is beyond their scope of practice to come onto the floor and start IV's.
The term "tech" needs defining . . .
steph
I work in an AL ER and techs do not start IV's. I would not mind if they were medics, in fact i think a medic would be a great asset to an ER.
I want to know exactly what is the the scope of practice is for an non EMT I or II tech in Alabama??
I am not happy with techs making decisions concerning pt care or assessments .
i am uncomfortable with techs dcing ivs then assessing the site . who would be responsible for problems resulting from ivs if assessed incorrectly??
Not to sure i like the idea of techs inserting foley caths... who will be responsible for Foley insertion that results in nasocromial infection due to sloppy/non sterile technique? i am seeing techs do things that should be reserved for rns or lpns . I am seeing nurses allowing techs to perform or make decisions concerning pts that would be a liability to the facility due to the increase in the number of pt needing care vs number of rns on shift.
a tech should not be taking on professional duties reserved for nursing. what kind of impact will this have on professional nursing?
i am definitely unhappy with the sub. OJT nurses is not a good idea... duties are being passed to techs with little or no training and or formal education. there should be a definite line drawn.
i do agree a tech can be very valuable to doctors, nurses and pts when utilized properly.
I have no problem with techs starting IV, as long as they do it right and they let the nurse look at it after doing it. Some techs are more educated than some of us even, maybe even more knowledgeable than us RORO. Just look at your term "nasocromial", just to make a correction my friend, there is no such term as nasocromial. It is nosocomial, that means hospital-acquired. I hope you keep an open mind about learning from others even though they are supposedly "techs".
PedsERRN
38 Posts
Has anyone heard about a new law that will prevent techs from starting IVs? Our techs are the experts at IV starts; I don't know what the hospital will do if we can't use them!