Published
Our CRNAs will do an epidural on a patient with a tattoo only if they can place it without going through the inked areas. Their reasoning is that some tattoos are done with ink that contains lead and this can be released into the system if punctured in that area. Don't know if this is one of those theories that we just avoid because it "could" be a problem or if it is evidence based?
Which leads me to ask (slightly off topic), what about ppl w/ tats all over their arms? Granted, I know that a vein is not the same as getting into epidural space, but if there's a risk for introducing lead into the body as a previous poster mentioned, I would certainly like to know more about it.
our crnas will do an epidural on a patient with a tattoo only if they can place it without going through the inked areas. their reasoning is that some tattoos are done with ink that contains lead and this can be released into the system if punctured in that area. don't know if this is one of those theories that we just avoid because it "could" be a problem or if it is evidence based?
my occupational health nurse wont give me any injection through the tattoo on my deltoid. she said there is risk of pushing the ink into the muscle and there may be pathogens isolated in the ink even though it is not causing any infection right now while it is encapsulated in the dermis (or was it epidermis, maybe i better go back to a&p!). she keeps up on these things too, although i didnt ask her for the evidence she used to come to that conclusion.
i would think whatever risk there is of pushing contaminants into the muscle would be even greater with an epidural as it is is going in the epidural space and there is risk of puncturing the dura also.
this website http://www.metrokc.gov/health/vacscene/vol6-3.htm says
"is it safe to give a vaccine directly into an area where there is a tattoo?
yes, both intramuscular (im) and subcutaneous (sc) vaccines may be given through a tatoo."
and so does http://www.immunize.org/askexperts/experts_general.asp
so i will be doing some more research myself.
here http://www.cja-jca.org/cgi/content/full/49/10/1057 is something else that says no problem, after quite a search i cant find any evidence to support not doing epidurals or injections through a tattoo
I remember hearing about this a couple of years ago. The ever-popular tramp stamps are right in the epidural location. I personally wouldn't want to have an epidural through a tat (although I'm way too much of a pansy to have one anyway) because of the risk of pulling that pigment into the epidural space. I have heard that a lot of MDs and CRNAs feel okay about doing epidurals on well-healed tattoos but I think it is a risk.
http://tattoo.about.com/cs/tatfaq/f/epidural.htm
http://www.storknet.com/cubbies/childbirth/exwc3.htm
http://www.pregnancy-info.net/QA/answers-Tattoos_and_epidurals/
These aren't actually studies, just real folks that did/didn't get their epidurals based on their tats. This is interesting. I've never had a anes. refuse to do a epi r/t a tramp stamp! Didn't know it was an issue anywhere!
Lacie, BSN, RN
1,037 Posts
I work in dialysis so ob/gyn is a far fetch regarding my knowledge. A close friend of mine just gave birth and her MD refused to consider an epidural due to her having a tattoo on her lower back. If it was a relatively new tat I could see the risk of infection but one several years old. Can someone enlighten me on this or was the MD just being overly cautious? Thanks in advance!