Published
Never heard of a facility using double-lumen UACs. Would be especially problematic for growth requirements as you are "wasting" a line, using up precious fluids that could be used for protein, dextrose, or intralipids.
What's the rationale on your unit for using a double lumen? I'm genuinely curious.
We used both, especially on the big sick kids. Gave us that extra line so we didn't have to worry about incompatibilites so much. Also came in handy when giving blood products when all the other ports are in use, no
need to stop anything. This was before we had a peds IR doc(yeah!) to put in fem lines on these types of kids.
We do not use double lumen lines for our UACs. We only use double-lumen UVCs in certain situations - ONLY on our pre/postop cardiac patients that require pressors, PGE1, Flolan, etc... The vast majority of our patients only need a single lumen UVC, and have a PICC placed the day the 48hr sepsis rule out is complete.
ScammRNC
88 Posts
My unit has always used double lumen UAC's, but after a change in suppliers we now have a difficult time obtaining a waveform on our in-line BP. Hardly ever works the first few days and it doesn't matter if it is a 23 weeker or a 34 weeker. Does anyone else use double lumen UAC's and if so do you have any problems with ABP? How about single lumen?