Published
Please send a letter to your Congressman about enacting the bill about having mandatory nurse-to-patient ratios by going here:
http://www.nationalnursesunited.org/page/speakout/national-ratios
You can look more into what the proposed RN ratios will be and more here:
http://www.nationalnursesunited.org/issues/entry/ratios
We need your help to make this bill a reality. Send this to everyone you know.
Texas has had a law several years now that requires nursing staff to participate in a safe staffing committee where ratios and other issues can be discussed and then presented to the Board of Directors/Administration. HR and the CNO sit on the committee. The law does not promote ratios, because nurses fought to have it more flexible as one patient can be too many sometimes. The idea is to have staffing mixes match patient need. I believe this system has good intent, but wonder if the follow-thru is effective, as we cannot change budgets and that is what drives staffing availibility.
My state has a law similar that is being proposed in my state; the SNA has a upcoming legislative day next month.
Texas has had a law several years now that requires nursing staff to participate in a safe staffing committee where ratios and other issues can be discussed and then presented to the Board of Directors/Administration. HR and the CNO sit on the committee. The law does not promote ratios, because nurses fought to have it more flexible as one patient can be too many sometimes. The idea is to have staffing mixes match patient need. I believe this system has good intent, but wonder if the follow-thru is effective, as we cannot change budgets and that is what drives staffing availibility.
Fighting for "flexibility" was stupid. Because there is ALWAYS the flexibility to staff better, but when we fight ratios because we want "flexibility" all we end up doing is giving administrators the flexibility to continue to staff unsafely. Nurses have a "voice"??? Well la-di-da. Doesn't mean it's listened to.
Fighting for "flexibility" was stupid. Because there is ALWAYS the flexibility to staff better, but when we fight ratios because we want "flexibility" all we end up doing is giving administrators the flexibility to continue to staff unsafely. Nurses have a "voice"??? Well la-di-da. Doesn't mean it's listened to.
This.
Texas has had a law several years now that requires nursing staff to participate in a safe staffing committee where ratios and other issues can be discussed and then presented to the Board of Directors/Administration. HR and the CNO sit on the committee. The law does not promote ratios, because nurses fought to have it more flexible as one patient can be too many sometimes. The idea is to have staffing mixes match patient need. I believe this system has good intent, but wonder if the follow-thru is effective, as we cannot change budgets and that is what drives staffing availibility.
To add: the "flexibility" to staff better would be in the best interest by having no wiggle room to staff better, but effective; if that makes sense; being, that set ratios will not even give the loophole to not staff at all.
I think skill mix would still be effective with ratios, as well.
Our nursery nurses would lay down and die if they had 6 patients! We all get a fair share of drug withdrawal kids and they would all end up with us in NICU if you have a 2:1 ratio in there! 2:1 is fine if you have a vent kid and another stable feeder , but it would never fly for us to each have 2 kids while they had 6! There has to be another sub part to this for acuity. Right now we have a staffing chart that tells us when census=this then you staff with X. But if acuity is very low we might not need X and only staff with Y even though the chart says X.
j0yegan
171 Posts
Might as well try to send a letter to Congress... and share this with every single person you know.