My NANDA nursing diagnosis handbook only lists risk for infection as a nursing diagnosis. While writing my care plan I feel that the main concern with most of my patients is infection, but not risk for. They are exhibiting signs of infection (high WBC, fever, cloudy urine, purulent drainage, etc.), so I can not list that as risk for infection because it is apparent that the infection already exists. I don't understand why plain old infection is not a nursing diagnosis when I have so much assessment data that I could put toward that diagnosis.
Does anyone have an explanation for this, or know a way to still include certain information/data under a different diagnosis?
83STEIN
2 Posts
My NANDA nursing diagnosis handbook only lists risk for infection as a nursing diagnosis. While writing my care plan I feel that the main concern with most of my patients is infection, but not risk for. They are exhibiting signs of infection (high WBC, fever, cloudy urine, purulent drainage, etc.), so I can not list that as risk for infection because it is apparent that the infection already exists. I don't understand why plain old infection is not a nursing diagnosis when I have so much assessment data that I could put toward that diagnosis.
Does anyone have an explanation for this, or know a way to still include certain information/data under a different diagnosis?