"Houston we have a problem" This just got very real

Published

And so it begins....

A health care worker who treated Thomas Eric Duncan, the first person in the U.S. diagnosed with Ebola who later died, has preliminarily tested positive for the deadly virus, the Texas Department of State Health Services said in a statement today.

The health care worker at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital has been isolated since reporting a low-grade fever Friday, the department said. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will conduct further testing to confirm the diagnosis.

"We knew a second case could be a reality, and we've been preparing for this possibility," Dr. David Lakey, commissioner of the Texas Department of State Health Services said in the statement. "We are broadening our team in Dallas and working with extreme diligence to prevent further spread."

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/texas-health-care-worker-tests-positive-ebola/story?id=26135108
But I also wonder- aside from widespread global travel, why now? Why has ebola been around for decades and is only now a problem? Is it this particular strain? Does anyone know?

No, it’s not a different strain. It’s Ebola Zaire and it’s been the culprit in many pervious outbreaks. I’d argue that this disease has been a problem before, approximately 1.500 human beings have lost their lives in previous outbreaks. The world just doesn’t seem that bothered as long as it’s just African people who are dying. Now all of a sudden it’s hitting close to home and everyone is getting all hot and bothered.

I’m just voicing my contempt for an uncaring, looking-out-for-number-one “first-world”, my venom isn’t directed at you, MommaRN1. I understood your question to be “why is this current outbreak spreading so rapidly and affecting so many, compared to previous outbreaks”. I think that’s a valid question.

As you mentioned, the ease and speed which we can travel from one part of the world to another certainly facilitates the spread of a contagious disease. However I think (my own theory) that the reason that we’re seeing an outbreak on such a large scale is primarily due to the fact that the disease has spread from rural, remote areas and reached densely populated cities. Not only are these cities crowded, but they are also situated in very poor countries. The housing and sanitation standards are abysmal and the availability of healthcare facilities to care for sick people is pitifully inadequate. Added to that, many people don’t trust the authorities and healthcare professionals and are hesitant to seek medical attention.

The second reason is that the rest of the world has been too slow in responding to this developing crisis. It’s been too little, too late. In my opinion it can still be contained, but it will take a long time and a lot of resources. The necessary resources to combat a further spread, needs to be urgently deployed, preferably yesterday. Time is of the essence.

Just to give everyone an idea of how dirt poor these countries are here is the nominal GDP (gross domestic product) per capita (person) for three countries:

US $53.001 (2013)

Nigeria $2.760 (2013)

Liberia $436 (2012) (Source: Wikipedia)

These people are poor! Their access to healthcare is crap.

Researchers believe that this current outbreak started in a remote location in Guinea in December of 2013

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1404505#t=articleTop

but wasn’t identified as an Ebola virus outbreak until late March, 2014. For the next three or four months the outbreak spread at a steady but rather slow rate, nowhere close to the dramatic spread we’re seeing now.

The first Ebola case in Conakry (the capital of Guinea) is believed to be late in May 2014, the first case in Monrovia (the capital of Liberia) was in mid-June and the first case in Freetown (the capital of Sierra Leone) in mid-July. (Feel free to verify these dates if you wish, I’m relying on my memory here :) ).

From the end of March until July 20th the number of cases reported were:

Guinea: 415

Liberia: 224

Sierra Leone: 454

And then the latest number I’ve seen was from October 8th:

Guinea: 1350

Liberia: 4076

Sierra Leone: 2950

The first period is approximately four months and the second about two and a half months. The time when the numbers pretty much exploded is around July/August, shortly after the outbreak had reached the more densely populated cities.

Of course with exponential spread it’s not great news that we couldn’t contain the disease while it was still in remote and isolated areas.

The following link is in Swedish so you may not be able to understand it.

”Vi tvingas be ebolasjuka att gå hem” | Läkare Utan Gränser

Anyways ;), it’s a Swedish physician working for MSF (Doctors without Borders) in Liberia and the headline is: “We are forced to ask people sick with Ebola to return to their homes”. I watched an interview on the evening news with him and a Swedish nurse who had also worked at the Elwa 3 Ebola care facility in Monrovia, and they reported that they were forced to turn away people seeking help. These people were infected and symptomatic.

The rainy season has started and they said that people were lying on the ground in vomit and diarrhea in a miserable state and the only thing the healthcare staff could do was to tell them to return to their homes. The medical facility was full, no available space. Some people would still wait outside in the mud, waiting for someone to die in the facility so that a space might become available.

The sick patients who had no choice to return to their homes undoubtedly went on and infected others, both in their home and possibly on their trek to it. It’s just a horrendous situation, hard for us to grasp here in the sheltered part of the world.

It’s no great mystery why this outbreak is continuing to spread. Too little, too late. We need to get moving and control the further spread in West Africa.

For anyone who’s still entertaining the airborne notion. Patrick Sawyer (index patient in Nigeria) left Liberia and plane-hopped (already sick as I understand it) across Africa until he landed in Lagos, Nigeria and sought medical attention. Lagos is a huge, crowded city with approximately 21 million inhabitants.

Here are some photographs of Lagos:

https://www.google.se/search?q=lagos+nigeria&biw=1342&bih=594&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=rgo7VODUGMaaygPTgYKwCw&sqi=2&ved=0CB8QsAQ#imgdii=_

Nigeria has had a total of 20 cases of Ebola infected patients so far, and no new cases have been reported since the end of August. I believe it’s about two more weeks until they (Nigeria) will be officially declared Ebola-free.

If Nigeria can do this, I’m sure that we can too. I still feel as I have since the Ebola outbreak started making international headlines, that even though this is a very scary disease, I fear mass panic and irrational behavior much more.

Specializes in ED.
Has anyone else noticed that it appears that the longer the virus is incubating in the host, the more likely it is to be transmitted to someone else.

I first got this idea when I read the reports on EBSCO that stated that the most infectious stage in Ebola is in a corpse.

Why didn't the ER nurse in the Dallas ER become infected?

Why hasn't members of Mr Duncan's family shown symptoms? He returned to them after his first ER visit upon becoming symptomatic.

It makes sense that within the chain of infection, "an infectious dose" would require less of an exposure as the infection rages on. Especially when one is taking care of a patient who was losing the fight against Ebola.

Just some early morning musings....

Being more contagious later in the disease process actually makes a lot of sense. If you think about how this disease works and how people begin sweating with fevers and bleeding from all orifices, the opportunities for coming into contact with infected bodily fluids is much higher as the person gets sicker. Prior to becoming really ill with ebola, people aren't usually going around vomiting, bleeding and sweating on everything, so it would make sense that it would be less likely to contract it at this point.

Specializes in Short Term/Skilled.
Lysol spray kills 99.9% of viruses and bacteria when used as directed I wonder is Ebola that .1%

Based on what I am learning in microbiology, that 1% has to be A TON of viruses, or they are full of crap.

I am wondering if it isn't someone in the ED that first saw him...now the question is....how many patients did those healthcare workers see from patient 0...Thomas Eric Duncan

Then how many people did those people see....

Then how many people that saw the people who came in contact with the ED patient saw people...

Our mobile crowded world isn't made for containing a contagion

Yes, I agree. I would really like to see confirmation on this.

Specializes in L&D, Women's Health.
But I also wonder- aside from widespread global travel, why now? Why has ebola been around for decades and is only now a problem? Is it this particular strain? Does anyone know?

Because someone in a major city ate bush meat . . . who knows, except this outbreak has been in cities.

Specializes in L&D, Women's Health.
Yes! I think the CDC doesn't want to admit that the virus is likely mutating and transmission is changing. They did update the transmission warning to include bodily fluids through casual contact within 3 feet. I.e someone could sneeze on you depositing infectious saliva. It's very unsettling.

CDC has always said it can be transmitted in saliva. 2 + 2 = droplets.

Specializes in L&D, Women's Health.
Exactly, how would a photographer get it? How close is he, they use distance to get the photo. I believe we are being lied to. Nurses we are a dime a dozen!

I believe they said the photographer was exposed while power-cleaning the inside of a car that transported someone with Ebola.

I wish I could like this comment a thousand times Esme12. For a second I really thought I was the only one feeling horrible for the nurse and thinking that it may have absolutely nothing to do with her ppe performance.

-Looking at it through a nurses eyes, you don't just "forget" that a patient who is in quarantine has ebola.

- I mean if anything I would A) assume that (with the exception of a change of shift) that the hospital probably had a specific "team" in place for the patient with ebola in order to limit contact and possible exposure etc. B) With the rareness of ebola in the US and the fact that her hospital had at that point in time the only known case in the US, I'm sure the hospital reinforced the need to pay special attention and had signs on the door to quarantine etc. This wasn't a case of TB (which can be bad) this is a disease that has a huge fatality rate and potential to wipe out cities at a time. You don't just "forget" this while putting on and taking off your PPE.

-Which makes me think that the nurse most likely did everything right, and the CDC is probably using this as their "fallback" because they don't want to start an uproar, and quite frankly if that's the case, it doesn't sit very well with me.

- I also "heard" ( but in all honestly I have NO idea if this is true) something to the effect that they should have been wearing respirators, but they weren't supplied with them. Which just makes me wonder about the obvious probability that it is airborne in some cases. I feel like even though "they have nothing to base this notion off of" that we're probably better off treating as such.

- The fact that some people were trying to place the blame (before it got out that it was a nurse, and not another member of a healthcare team) on CNA's etc (and others who are "below nurses" on the chain of command) should be disgusted with themselves. You are everything that is wrong with the ethics of nursing and how we treat each other (meaning the whole entire healthcare team) no wonder we nurses rip each other to shreds most of the time. Please,talk to a nurse who's been in the field for longer than 5-10 years...they'll tell ya how it should be done and how nurses should treat each other and every member of the healthcare team.

- To the nurse in Dallas who is unfortunately involved with this horrible mess, this new nurses heart goes out to you. Stay strong, thoughts and prayers are with you.

Specializes in L&D, Women's Health.

My thoughts . . .

If Nigeria and Senegal, third-world countries, could contain Ebola, I have confidence that the US can manage containment as well. Nigeria exposure is very similar to that in Dallas. An American cared for his sister who had Ebola and then flew into Nigeria. He was vomiting and had diarrhea on the airplane. He was not isolated until 4 hours after the plane landed. From that exposure, Nigeria had 19 confirmed cases with 8 deaths. I anticipate there will be more cases in Dallas, especially since he was discharged after his first visit, but I also anticipate it will be contained.

Of course, the disease would be more contagious the longer a person is infected because they then start with projectile vomiting and diarrhea. I would be wearing boot covers along with the rest of the PPE.

CDC also has an algorithm for Ebola assessment in health care centers: http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/pdf/ebola-algorithm.pdf

I wonder if the hospital followed this algorithm and called the health department when Mr Duncan first appeared.

Ebola is an "orphan" disease with only 1716 cases reported between 1976 and 2013. There are orphan diseases with almost 200,000 cases that drug companies ignore. Why would Ebola be any different? (Except now, of course.)

If it were airborne, we would know it!

CDC has always said it can be transmitted in saliva. 2 + 2 = droplets.

To be fair, I'm far more concerned with the expected projectile vomiting and diarrhea associated with Ebola. Most of your standard PPE isn't designed to deal with this. 6 feet of droplet worries pales in comparison imho. I say this having done my time being 'Christened.'

+ Join the Discussion