Questioning Zohran Mamdani

[luv2]

Does Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani know how to legislate, or is he just riding the coattails of others while claiming the glory? The primary function of the New York State Legislature is to make laws. Article III of the State Constitution vests the legislative power of the State in the Senate and Assembly. The Legislature has nearly total control of the legislative process and is fully responsible for its proceedings.

When asked about his legislative achievements, Mamdani's response was disappointing. He could not provide any concrete examples of laws he had personally created to cut "red tape" for small businesses. He co-sponsored a bill that was authored and introduced by Assemblymember Catalina Cruz, not him. This stark contrast between his claims and his actual legislative record raises serious questions about his leadership. This is not leadership; it is political grandstanding. It is the classic move of someone eager to take the credit without doing the work, like that coworker who swoops in at the end of a project to slap their name on it.

What tangible changes has Mamdani brought about during his time in office that have significantly improved the lives of New Yorkers, particularly those in Queens, NY? This is a question that needs to be asked and answered.

 

 

[heron, ASN, RN]

I briefly skimmed his website a couple of days ago. Not a NYC resident, so that's about as much time as I'm going to spend on his campaign for now.

That being said, the site is heavy on the progressive wish list and pretty empty on plans for implementation.

Meh

[luv2]

@heron The Democratic Party appears to be moving toward a communist/socialist message as its defining direction. While this may resonate with a small faction of the base, it is not a winning strategy on the national stage. Elevating Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani's rhetoric as a model for the party risks alienating the very voters Democrats need to build durable coalitions. 
What makes this even more concerning is the hypocrisy at play. Mamdani, who promotes himself as a champion of socialist ideals, has chosen to obscure his wealth, owning multiple high-value properties. Yet, not a single Democrat other than mayoral candidates has dared to call him out. This silence undermines the party's credibility. It echoes the dynamic we saw with George Santos, though in reverse, where Santos fabricated accomplishments to appear more successful, Mamdani minimizes his wealth to fit a political narrative. In both cases, the public is left with a politician who is not transparent and a party unwilling to hold one of its own accountable.
Now, Mamdani goes further, advocating for community property over individual ownership, despite his ownership of multiple homes. He has even suggested city-owned grocery stores, a move that could undermine private businesses and jeopardize the jobs of everyday New Yorkers. The history of socialism is rife with instances where it has failed the very people it claims to serve, concentrating power, eroding personal freedom, and stifling opportunity. The threat to private ownership is real and should make us all anxious about the potential impact of socialist policies.

[heron, ASN, RN]

I think you raise some good questions. I don't think that the naive platform of an inexperienced local legislator is a particularly productive starting point. I might change my mind about that as the campaign evolves, though.

[Tweety, BSN, RN]

Is there a candidate that campaigns on the idea "I'm a very wealthy person"?  Can a wealthy person champion the idea they should pay more in taxes and do more for inequality?  

Trump has already issued his standard threat that if he doesn't do right if he gets in he's not getting any federal money.   I'm not sure Democrats as a party are moving toward communist/socialist ideas but we also want to counter the idea of tax cuts to the wealthy at a time when social programs and the safety net are being cut.  It's almost as if Republicans are responsible for this lean towards Democrat Socialism.

 

[luv2]

heron said:

I think you raise some good questions. I don't think that the naive platform of an inexperienced local legislator is a particularly productive starting point. I might change my mind about that as the campaign evolves, though.

Let's say the quiet thing out loud for all America to see and question. To encourage every NYC resident to vote against   Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani. The independent candidates must unite for the good of America. 

  Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani= Communism= makes no sense in America.

 

This is a breakdown 

What he really thinks about housing. Is this what the new Democratic Party supports?

 

[heron, ASN, RN]

Umm - not interested in your campaign contribution. Since I'm not a New York voter, and you seem unwilling to discuss the issues raised by Mamdani, it makes no sense for me to continue in this thread.🪡 

[luv2]

heron said:

Umm - not interested in your campaign contribution. Since I'm not a New York voter, and you seem unwilling to discuss the issues raised by Mamdani, it makes no sense for me to continue in this thread.🪡 

@heronThis is not a campaign contribution message; there is nowhere in this thread where a request was made for any money or support for any particular candidate. I called for the unification of the mayoral candidates. It is a message to all Americans to pay attention and understand that this election can alter and change the foundational principles of this country by electing  Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani= a democratic socialist = Communism= which, makes no sense in America. Thank you for reading this thread.

[luv2]

Tweety said:

Is there a candidate that campaigns on the idea "I'm a very wealthy person"?  Can a wealthy person champion the idea they should pay more in taxes and do more for inequality?  

Trump has already issued his standard threat that if he doesn't do right if he gets in he's not getting any federal money.   I'm not sure Democrats as a party are moving toward communist/socialist ideas but we also want to counter the idea of tax cuts to the wealthy at a time when social programs and the safety net are being cut.  It's almost as if Republicans are responsible for this lean towards Democrat Socialism.

 

What has Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani really accomplished since his election in 2021? Is he solving problems, or is he part of them? Voters should pay close attention because if Mamdani wins, Democrats risk losing the midterm elections, fueling fear of the so-called "NEW DEMOCRAT.” And make no mistake: Mamdani will be the reason. He preaches government control while personally owning three homes a stark contradiction that demands a closer examination of his record.

 

[heron, ASN, RN]

luv2 said:

What has Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani really accomplished since his election in 2021? Is he solving problems, or is he part of them? Voters should pay close attention because if Mamdani wins, Democrats risk losing the midterm elections, fueling fear of the so-called "NEW DEMOCRAT.” And make no mistake: Mamdani will be the reason. He preaches government control while personally owning three homes a stark contradiction that demands a closer examination of his record.

 

First of all, Mamdani is not a communist. He is a Democratic Socialist. They are not the same. Democratic socialists are allowed (to and often do) own property, invest in businesses and be rich. Repeatedly claiming that Mamdani is a communist is essentially a straw man.

Thinking about the effects on the midterms, not sure I agree that Mamdani as mayor of NYC would trigger the nationwide panic you predict. On the other hand, look how long it took to elect a Catholic president. Jury's still out, I guess.

 

[Beerman, BSN]

luv2 said:

What has Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani really accomplished since his election in 2021? Is he solving problems, or is he part of them? Voters should pay close attention because if Mamdani wins, Democrats risk losing the midterm elections, fueling fear of the so-called "NEW DEMOCRAT.” And make no mistake: Mamdani will be the reason. He preaches government control while personally owning three homes a stark contradiction that demands a closer examination of his record.

these

Part of me wants him to win.  Let's test out the Democratic socialist ideas and see how it goes.

[heron, ASN, RN]

Beerman said:

Part of me wants him to win.  Let's test out the Democratic socialist ideas and see how it goes.

Hear, hear! Meanwhile, such ideas actually have been used in other places already. They are worth looking at, in my opinion. Who has time or energy to re-invent the wheel?