One Healthcare Risk Manager's View Of Individual Nursing Malpractice Insurance

This article details the coverage limitations of an individual nursing malpractice insurance policy that must be considered before deciding to purchase such a policy. Nurses General Nursing Article

Updated:  

I am often asked to answer this question: "As a nurse, should I buy my own ?" My short answer is if it makes you sleep better at night, it is worth it, but be aware of some significant coverage limitations that the people who sell insurance (NSO/HPSO and ProLiability) don't tell you about and they have a vested financial interest in selling you insurance. An interesting side note to this question is that in recent years, more and more physicians are now employees of hospitals, healthcare facilities or systems, and they never ask about, are marketed to, or purchase their own malpractice insurance to supplement the insurance provided through their employment. This is almost entirely a nursing concern.

By way of background in answering this question, I have been working in healthcare risk management, patient safety and malpractice claims defense since the early 1980's. I have worked in the lawfirm, medical malpractice insurance company, hospital, medical group and integrated healthcare system settings. I am board-certified in insurance, risk management and healthcare risk management. In addition to my private consulting practice, my day job is as a healthcare risk and quality manager. At any one time, I have several malpractice claims that I am working on, and I have handled dozens of malpractice claims involving nursing care. I have years of experience at the malpractice insurance company interpreting insurance policies and applying them to coverage questions.

Because each legal jurisdiction has unique statutory, regulatory and case law that can apply to malpractice and insurance issues, I am speaking in generalities and principles of broad application for this subject for a nurse employed by a hospital or healthcare facility. There may be unique statutory, regulatory or case law where you live and practice that make my opinions more or less applicable to you. You should always ask a risk manager or healthcare attorney experienced in malpractice insurance or malpractice liability as to how things work in your jurisdiction. Not all risk managers or healthcare attorneys have this expertise, but they should be able to refer you to someone who does or someone at the insurance company for the hospital or healthcare facility.

Most nurses buy their own coverage for two main reasons: malpractice and licensure defense coverage. My professional opinion is that for the typical nurse who only provides nursing care through his/her employment and does not engage in ethically-questionable conduct, you will likely never have to use it, and have to decide if the cost is worth the potential benefit. However, it only costs around $ 100/year for the typical nurse, and clearly if you don't buy the policy, you will never have coverage under it, whereas if you do buy the policy, you might have coverage under it.

If your employer does not have liability coverage for your professional duties, you are an independent contractor or you provide professional services outside the scope of your employment with a hospital/healthcare facility, then I strongly advise you to buy your own individual nursing liability policy. In these situations, your own liability policy will be primary, instead of excess coverage. There are also other coverages in the standard individual nursing liability policy that may be useful to you.

A key thing to bear in mind is the reason why it is so cheap is that the insurance companies make few payouts under the policy due to policy clauses that deny or limit coverage for most malpractice claims or licensure defense claims. The overwhelming majority of nursing malpractice claims are covered by the insurance of the hospital/healthcare facility who employs the nurse. Most BON investigations do not result in filing formal charges, and the licensure defense coverage only starts if formal charges are filed. Individual nursing liability policies are very profitable for the insurance companies due to the low combined loss ratio: few claims are paid out, reserved or incur defense costs in comparison to the premium being collected. The people who sell the insurance do not mention any of this.

The majority of individual nursing malpractice policies in the USA are written by two companies: CNA and Liberty Mutual. The two largest nursing insurance agents are NSO and ProLiability.

These agents sell insurance, just as do your local insurance agent, and you can buy other insurance products from NSO and ProLiability. The agents are not the actual insurance companies. The agents collect approximately 15% of the insurance premium as commission to place the actual insurance coverage with CNA in the case of NSO, and with Liberty Mutual, in the case of ProLiability. NSO is owned by Aon, a large insurance company, and ProLiability is owned by Marsh, a large insurance broker.

Out of your $ 100 insurance premium, about $ 85 of that goes to buy the actual insurance. Think about how few claims must be paid, in order to provide $ 1 million of coverage for only $ 85. Compare this to an Ob/gyn paying over $ 100,000 per year in Philadelphia for $ 1 million of coverage. In the medical malpractice insurance industry, the best proxy for the risk of paying claims under the policy is the insurance premium charged. The higher the premium, the more risk to the insurance company and the higher chance of paying claims. In the malpractice insurance industry, individual nursing policies are low risk and high profit for the insurance company.

The insurance policies have pretty standard language in them, and they issue various endorsements to modify the coverage or to meet the unique requirements of a given jurisdiction. One of the best pieces of advice I can give you for any insurance product is to read the policy when you get it. Have a good understanding of what the policy covers and what are the restrictions, before you need to use it. Look online or ask the insurance agent for a sample policy before you buy it, so you clearly understand what coverage you are paying for and the situations in which coverage may be invoked. Ask the agent to explain any policy clauses that you don't understand.

Most nurses buy their own individual malpractice insurance policies to have coverage for malpractice and BON actions. The purchasers think that having their own policy gives them unconditional coverage for these two events and they will have an attorney representing them for these situations. Here is where the significant potential limitations come in. You need to read and understand the policy definitions and clauses that limit coverage, and they are usually called the 'availability of other coverage', or 'other insurance' clauses and 'license defense', or 'license protection' clauses. Unless your policy provides coverage, you will not have your own attorney.

Here is the standard 'availability of other coverage' clause from the CNA policy:

Quote
This Policy is written as specific excess insurance over the insurance policy, self-insured retention, deductible, indemnification, agreement, trust agreement, patient compensation fund, other fund or risk transfer arrangement of any sort ('other insurance') provided by a third party. If any 'other insurance' is available to you, such 'other insurance' must pay first. It is the intent of this Policy to apply only to the amounts covered under this Policy which exceed the limit of any 'other insurance' whether primary, contributory, excess, contingent or otherwise. As such, this Policy will not contribute with any such 'other insurance'.

The practical effect of this clause is that your individual insurance only kicks in if the insurance coverage available through your work does not apply or those policy limits are exhausted. If you are employed by a hospital or healthcare facility that has insurance, your own insurance will not be your primary coverage. It is excess coverage over your employer's insurance. If your own individual coverage is not triggered, you will not have your own attorney representing you. Your own individual coverage will not be triggered unless someone is making a claim or filing a lawsuit naming you individually, and your employer's insurance limits have been exhausted, or their insurance company has notified you that you have no coverage, though a denial letter or reservation of rights letter. This does not happen for the typical nursing malpractice claim or suit. For the overwhelming majority of malpractice claims involving nursing care, the hospital/healthcare facility's insurance policy defends the facility and all employees involved in the suit. The typical hospital/healthcare facility also has lots of insurance coverage (up to several millions) and so the limits would not be exhausted by a settlement or award.

The hospital's insurance coverage likely also has an 'other insurance' clause, and this is often the subject of litigation: if both the hospital/facility and the nurse have malpractice insurance policies with an 'other insurance' clause, which insurance policy is primary and responds? Each jurisdiction probably has appellate case law on this subject, and most of the decisions are that the hospital/facility insurance is primary, while other decisions are that the hospital/facility and the nursing insurance policy splits the responsibility to respond, and a small number of decisions are that the nursing policy is primary. Your own individual coverage may be triggered if you are in one of the states providing that if both the hospital/healthcare facility and the individual nurse both have malpractice coverage, each insurance policy responds as primary coverage. One could argue that in these cases, having your own insurance policy results in a higher chance of adding you as a defendant, to access another set of insurance policy limits.

In most jurisdictions across the country, the employer, such as the hospital or healthcare group or facility, is legally liable for the acts of their employees under the legal principles of 'respondeat superior' and 'vicarious liability' or 'agency'.

This means that if the employee makes a mistake, the employer is responsible for it. Only in rare circumstances would the employer be able to escape legal liability for the acts of the employee. Each jurisdiction has their own case law on the subject, but typically, you may be able to avoid employer liability for criminal acts of the employee or acts outside the scope of employment. For example, if a nurse at the hospital is diverting narcotics, provides them to a family member and that family member dies, the hospital's insurance company may be able to successfully argue that their malpractice policy does not apply since the act of diversion was criminal and outside the scope of her employment. The individual nursing malpractice policy would also likely deny coverage on the basis of the criminal act. For the hospital, they may have insurance coverage under employment liability practices, that they negligently hired, supervised or retained the nurse who committed the diversion.

Many nurses strongly believe that if they make a mistake, the employer will say they were not following procedure, therefore are not covered by the and throw the nurse under the bus. Again, due to 'respondeat superior', the hospital/healthcare facility is most likely still legally liable for the actions of the nurse, and from the hospital's perspective, they want that insurance coverage to pay for the nursing liability. It makes no sense for the hospital to not have insurance coverage, since the hospital would then have to pay any settlements or awards out of pocket, rather than from the insurance company. I also point out that unless the hospital is self-insured, it is the insurance company, not the hospital, that is managing the claim.

Another consideration for any malpractice payouts is the lack of a 'consent to settle' clause in the nursing liability policy.

Most physician malpractice policies have a clause requiring the consent of the insured to settle any case. Since claim settlements can be reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank and/or the state disciplinary agency, most physicians want to be involved in the settlement decision. The standard individual nursing malpractice policy does not have this clause. The insurance company will make a decision as to settling the case or not, and this decision may be driven primarily on what is cheaper to the insurance company: defending the case or settling it, regardless of the wishes of the insured nurse.

In regards to representation before the BON, if you read the CNA policy, coverage is only triggered if the BON actually files charges against you. Typically, the policy provides up to $ 25,000 reimbursement for legal expenses. You have to find an attorney, usually pay them up front, and apply for reimbursement from the insurance company. Coverage is not triggered and there is no reimbursement if the BON is only investigating you. If you want an attorney representing you during the investigation, you will pay for this out of pocket.

Although there is much concern over the BON, the majority of investigations and charges typically involve allegations of diversion, theft from patients, substance abuse, boundary violations, criminal acts, and quality of care issues. Most nurses go their entire career without dealing with the BON, although this certainly varies from state to state.

This has been a high-level overview of a complex subject and insurance coverage and claim issues will always revolve around the facts of a given case, the language of the insurance policy and the unique statutory, regulatory or case law in a particular jurisdiction. If you think you might be involved in a malpractice, licensure defense or any other type of claim that you think is covered by your policy, contact your professional liability carrier, ask them to open a claim file and describe the situation to the claims manager. The company will use the facts of the case, apply it against the coverage agreement in the policy, and officially notify you if you have any coverage or not. If not, they will send you a coverage denial or a reservation of rights letter, and this is your notice of no coverage or coverage with conditions attached. If you have coverage, they will send you a letter confirming this and assign a claims manager to work with you. Tell them I said hello.

In summary, I would recommend purchasing your own individual nursing malpractice liability policy, but don't necessarily expect that the policy will automatically provide coverage for any malpractice or licensure issues that you are involved in.

RiskManager said:
In the typical scenario you describe, the nurse would not be liable for any defense or indemnity costs. I have cases all the time in which a nurse did not follow protocol or policy and procedure but was still acting in the scope of her employment. We still provide a defense and pay all defense and indemnity costs associated with the lawsuit. You might have some room to argue about the scope of employment, but unless a jury specifically carved out damages and allocated them solely to practicing outside the scope of employment, it would be hard to put a figure on that.

Again, these are general comments, and there may be unique statutory, case law or regulatory issues that apply to your jurisdiction.

Thank you for the article. I have had nurses think me insane because I do not carry nursing liability/malpractice insurance. I did for just a short time, when I worked for an employer who I didn't trust wouldn't fly the country if he got too badly embroiled in a legal deal. Seriously, that was the only reason. Otherwise, I've recognized that there would be no real benefit to my maintaining separate coverage. As you've pointed out, the annual cost is small, indicating the risk is also miniscule.

People often provide anecdotal evidence as to why the insurance is so absolutely necessary for every working nurse, but in reality.....it's not. Even if a lawsuit materializes years after an event, even after the nurse leaves the employer, protections remain in place for the employee....the employee was STILL an agent of the employer at the time of the event.

If the risks to a nurse were significant, the cost would also be significant when it came to insurance coverage. Look at what insurance for cars, property costs. Significant, because the expectation of NEEDING that insurance is significant. Nurses who are not self-employed? No.

If it makes someone feel better to spend the money, then I guess whatever they spend is worth it to them. Me.....nah.

Specializes in Healthcare risk management and liability.
Susie2310 said:
Good point. My understanding/experience has been that one can choose individual malpractice insurance that covers one for claims made at any time in the future for an incident that took place during the time that particular policy was in place.

You are referring to the difference between the two major types of malpractice policies: claims-made vs. occurrence. The nursing policies are occurrence: any claims that occur while the policy is in force are covered even after the policy is cancelled and the claim is reported after cancellation. Most physician malpractice insurance policies are claims made: any claims that occur and are reported to the insurance company while the policy is in force are covered. Any claims that are reported after the policy is cancelled are not covered, unless you buy an 'extended reporting endorsement' or 'tail coverage', which then provides coverage for any claims that occurred during the policy period but were reported after the policy was cancelled.

Specializes in Healthcare risk management and liability.
KeepItRealRN said:
We all know that lawsuits often pop up years after the fact. Lets say you are a former employee of a facility that is being sued by a patient you took care of. It would seem that the former employer would only put up a defense for a former employee in so much as the nurses interests are in line with the hospitals. In a scenario like this I see the nurse the former employee hanging out in the wind if it is the best interest of the hospital.

My linked article goes into the concept of 'respondeat superior' and how the employer is legally liable for the acts of current and former employees. Speaking as a claims manager who does hospital claims, it is generally not in the best interests of the hospital, from a claims perspective, to go blaming the current or former employees. I am still legally and financially liable for them, and pissing on them is only going to drive up the value of the case for the plaintiff. Providers and staff are still held accountable, and sometimes that means personnel actions. But that is separate from the workup and defense of claims.

Specializes in Nephrology, Cardiology, ER, ICU.

I'm a practicing APRN and have had private since I first became licensed as an LPN many years ago.

The reason I keep it is as a protection for "myself". I was once named in a lawsuit for reporting a local celebrity to CPS. He felt that I violated his "rights" and took it to the media. Needless to say the hospital UR dept was on it quickly in full support of "me." However, I contacted my own lawyer (via my malpractice insurance) to ensure I said nothing wrong to my own employer.

I have also used my malpractice insurance for a license issue where I wanted someone who was not employer to review a document.

So....for me....yep totally worth it.

Specializes in Psych ICU, addictions.

Very interesting and insightful article.

I'm still never practicing without my own insurance though. I don't expect miracles from my coverage, but I'm looking to protect my own interests because, despite what you and my employers may say, no one else is going to put my interests before theirs. Nor are they going to go to the mat for me if it comes at a liability to them. I would hope my employer protects me should--God forbid--something happen, but just in case...

The money I spend on the policy is worth the peace of mind. And may I never have to use that policy.

Specializes in Informatics / Trauma / Hospice / Immunology.

When I looked into it at NSO, there were no options on the nature of policy you purchase. There were merely standard packages based on your job type. I guess you could attempt to understand all the nuances of the policy in an attempt to determine if it is worth it, but I look at it as an extra parachute. You likely will never need it, but it's there if you want it. Exactly how the parachute works is not really important since there is no alternative available. Am I oversimplifying? Perhaps the other insurance company sells more variation in options?

Great write up. Thank you for sharing your knowledge.

I had my own individual policy through NSO, and there were two instances where I was glad they had my back. One incident involved my sister-in-law, who fell down my stairs, in my home. She had a history of filing lawsuits, so when she broke her ankle, and I provided first aid, I called NSO and reviewed my actions. Another situation occurred when I provided first aid to a motorcycle accident victim. In California, I would not be caught without .

Awesome article! Thanks!

I love the way you mention the fine prints regarding how insurance works, and thanks for bringing up the term 'respondeat superior'--we touched briefly on it in 1st semester.

This article should have more than 3 pages of comments, but d/t your fact-based communication style, it is expected, as this type of communication style precludes anecdotal comments.

According to the National Practitioner Data Bank, nurses account for about 2.5% of all medical malpractice payments (as of 2015).

Googling further, these malpractices revolve around these three areas: medication errors, communication errors, and failure to monitor and assess --> the top 3 'skills' nursing instructors heavily focus on (recall: 3 checks; repeat back; re-assess).

I'm still in my first year and I don't carry a ; reading other related threads, I think I might have the skills to sell insurance for kicks&giggles...:roflmao: