Obsessed ? or Justified?

Published

The other day I had a pt come in 39 wks with severe RUQ pain, for some reason preeclampsia did not cross my mind at the time, I R/O labor and called the OB who to me at the time justifyably gave me orders to transfer her to ER, because she did not seem to have an obsterical complication-------------

My thoughts were it must be gallstones or appendicitis..............................

An hour later it popped into my mind she could have been mistaking her pain for epigastric pain :uhoh3: I remembered her B/P was 149/93 and she had +2 protein in her urine with some generalized swelling, I rushed over to the ER to see if she had gotten an u/s, she was not there, I went to the u/s dept. and she was there, they R/O gallstones/appendicitis & hydronephrosis, I thought for sure it had to be epigastric pain, by this time I had my nurse manager with me so she was aware of how I felt. I called the OB and explained to him how I felt and he started yelling that he wasn't aware of her elevated B/P, I assured him I had told him and he continued to yell and swear, I told him to calm down I just wanted him to transfer the pt back to L&D, her pain was probably the reason her B/P was elevated, amazingly he shuted up and called the ER physician. I still was not sure what was up with my pt I checked her labs and her clotting profile was WNL, chest x-ray was -.

It was time for me to go home and I felt so uncomfortable about this case, the pt was still in ER, I asked my nurse manager to look into it, she called the ER and the ER doc did not want to release her until they performed a complete work up, here I was thinking she could have a seizure in the ER instead of in L&D where she belongs :uhoh21: I called in the middle of the night and found out she was going to be transferred back to L&D , but was not there yet, I barely slept thinking why did I let her go to the damn ER (We should have R/O preclampsia first)............

The next morning she was on my L&D floor ,only thing she had was WBC @ 18,000 and RUQ pain all the other test were -...I felt good nothing was wrong with her, but I can't help but to think was I obsessed with this pt's condition? or was I justified to feel this way. Anyways she stayed with us for two days and then we induced her, uncomplicated labor and delivery :D and we still don't know what was wrong with her. :smackingf

Why is it, that people can go to school for years and obtain a nursing degree, yet they can't spell very simple words. Ex..maybe, alot, having etc...just a thought...?:uhoh21:

Specializes in Education, FP, LNC, Forensics, ED, OB.
Why is it, that people can go to school for years and obtain a nursing degree, yet they can't spell very simple words. Ex..maybe, alot, having etc...just a thought...?:uhoh21:

There is a thread on this topic.

Many in cyberspace type in a hurry and do not do a "spell check". It has nothing to do with the education experience and is an unfair remark to the nurses of Allnurses.com.

Why is it, that people can go to school for years and obtain a nursing degree, yet they can't spell very simple words. Ex..maybe, alot, having etc...just a thought...?:uhoh21:

Well my excuse is just pure laziness. If it is a glaring mistake, I'll go back and correct it. Many times I just don't catch it in my posts. Maybe I should but I don't apply the same anal retentiveness to my spelling and grammar on here as I do my charting. I do try to make my posts look coherent and puctuate but I don't proof read everything I post.

Anyway, back to the topic...no I don't think you were obsessed. I don't understand why the doctor would transfer her to ER in the first place with all those other signs...even if her labs were normal, if you had told him about the BP and swelling ect. But I'm not an L+D nurse so I'm probably commenting on the wrong subject. (I work in NICU...so I know a little...but just a little) I just think it's great though how we have so many nurses here that have so much knowledge on the subject (Siri and Smiling_Blue_eyes among a few). I've learned so much reading these boards.

Specializes in Specializes in L/D, newborn, GYN, LTC, Dialysis.

i would like to remind members to remain focused on the topic of the thread and avoid snide comments about mis-spelling, or other distractions from the topic at hand. this adds nothing to the discussion.

anyone can make a mistake, even us nurses/nursing students. :nurse: this is really a casual forum here; most of us are not writing doctoral dissertations, etc. let's try hard to overcome mis-spellings and focus on what is actually being communicated , instead.

i thank you for that.

i would like to remind members to remain focused on the topic of the thread and avoid snide comments about mis-spelling, or other distractions from the topic at hand. this adds nothing to the discussion.

anyone can make a mistake, even us nurses/nursing students. :nurse: this is really a casual forum here; most of us are not writing doctoral dissertations, etc. let's try hard to overcome mis-spellings and focus on what is actually being communicated , instead.

i thank you for that.

thank goodness your here to keep us on track!, where the heck did that spelling crack come from?????????????? :madface:

anyways back to the thread at hand :kiss

i know it is appropriate to treat for protienuria, but what about those few pt who don't have preeclampsia , but infact have an underlying disease process (kidney problems, diabetes,ect...)should they too be treated for preeclamsia? because they have protienuria.

Specializes in PeriOp, ICU, PICU, NICU.

MY 2 cents goes for Justified :)

Specializes in Specializes in L/D, newborn, GYN, LTC, Dialysis.

And, clearly the whole clinical picture must be considered in this and all other cases: if a person has chronic disease processes, you must treat her for those things..... appropriately.

Most of the time, however, it is KNOWN when a person has underlying diabetes, kidney or HTN disease processes in her health history. So they a must be treated according to history and current s/s. GOOD POINT!!!! Ty for bringing it up!

I was just referring mainly to the case where no known underlying condition can explain the proteinurea now presenting.

+ Join the Discussion