Published
i read several journals and this one caught my eye and felt the need to share with all of you...
"the phoenix business journal's matt haldane explains how nearly $5 million will be spread across several different groups as part of the effort to train more nurses. click the link below for more."
Most of the articles you see in business publications like Bloomberg are based on studies done by David Auerbach, Douglas Staiger, and Peter Buerhaus. They work hand in glove with the AACN and the ANA. I'd suggest people look at their history of accurately predicting what occurs in the nursing employment market before deciding whether they should be treated as though their statements are as truth delivered from on high.
Multicollinearity, BSN, RN
3,119 Posts
In nursing school I recall a nursing instructor telling me that the ideal nurse for an AZ hospital has 2 years of experience. Not a new grad, so the hospital doesn't have to invest time and money in training. Not a really experienced nurse because they'll be higher on a pay-scale and stretch the budget. And those really experienced nurses...they have enough experience to call BS when they see it. Really experienced nurses are a force to be reckoned with that weak managers don't want to deal with.
As far as AZ investing in producing new grad RNs - I've seen many new grads leaving for New Mexico and Texas. Why are Arizonans paying to fund AZ nursing programs that feed new nurses into New Mexico and Texas? I had to leave myself, 2 years ago. That the "nursing shortage" mantra is still echoed just shows whose vested interests are being protected - and it's not the nurses or taxpayers.