My PhD Journey - Part 1

This article describes my experience in a challenging PhD program, while working full time as nursing faculty. I am pleased to announce that I am now at the halfway point of my PhD journey and a dissertation awaits! Nurses Announcements Archive Article

It is hard to believe that it has been three years since I started the epic journey towards a PhD in nursing, as a part-time student who already had a full plate as full time nursing faculty in a busy university setting. Since then, I have alternately been exhausted and invigorated, with never a dull moment in between. I have been stretched to the limit, challenged beyond my natural ability, and equipped with a wide range of academic skills beyond my wildest dreams.

The PhD nursing program at my university consists of 50 to 56 semester hours of coursework, to be completed over three to five years. Due to my whirlwind schedule, I quickly learned to multi-task and take advantage of every free moment. Somehow during each successive semester, every assignment was completed satisfactorily on time. A 'little here' sprinkled to a 'little there' caused even the most intimidating mountain of scholarly work to become manageable. In the midst of it all, I grew in ways I could never have envisioned. For instance, I can now write effectively with clarity and insight and can make tangible connections between nebulous concepts and ideas.

Way back in fall 2008, I embarked on my journey into the doctoral world by taking the first core course, Philosophy of Science. There I was quickly submerged into assigned readings of numerous books and articles written in almost incomprehensible language that discussed foreign concepts such as ontology, epistemology, phenomenology, existentialism, rationalism, empiricism, positivism, and realism. I couldn't even pronounce these topics, much less understand them. I felt totally lost. As I persevered, however, a whole new world opened up to me. I was introduced to some of the brightest minds throughout human history: Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Locke, Husserl, Popper, and Kuhn - just to name a few.

Another core course was Statistical Methods, which included critiquing numerous nursing research articles and conducting statistical analyses with research data. We learned to use the dreaded SPSS software with the same familiarity and ease as Excel or Word. We performed descriptive statistics, multiple regression, logistic regression, factor analysis, and structural equation modeling.

One class had us perform a concept analysis, while studying nursing theories/ theorists in depth, as we completed three major research papers in one semester (this was quite a feat, while working full time). Of course, it was the expectation that our papers be crafted in immaculate APA style.

During yet another semester, my cohort and I explored quantitative and qualitative research methodologies in great detail, actually performing a mini-qualitative study from start to finish!

By the end of the spring semester of this year (2011), I had successfully completed all coursework in the curriculum plan - a notable milestone. It was now time for me to sit for the Doctoral Candidacy Exam, to assess my readiness to pursue independent research and my ability to think critically. The candidacy exam consists of a written and oral portion. The written part was five questions, open book, and I had eight days to complete it. During that week, I barely slept or ate, while I feverishly cranked out 30 pages of typed material to turn in. This was, of course, in addition to my faculty duties. The oral part consisted of me appearing before the three members of my candidacy committee for approximately two hours, while I defended my written responses to the questions. The experience was grueling, bruising, and exhausting - that's all I want to say about it. As the committee members grilled me unrelentingly, I felt certain that I had failed the candidacy process. Imagine my surprise when they announced at the end of the two-hour ordeal that I had passed!

Now that I have achieved the status of doctoral candidate, I must form my dissertation committee, further refine my research topic and research question, and then begin to pursue my dissertation research. Please stay tuned for Part 2....

Specializes in Nurse Scientist-Research.

Vicky,

Just found this article when searching this forum and it was inspiring. 2-3 years after finishing my ADN I pretty much gave up my ambition to be a nurse educator. Having just finished my BSN (after a nice 20 year break from school) nursing education seemed a completely reasonable objective. After investigating it a little more and reviewing my most favorite/least favorite BSN experiences I started investigating BSN to PhD programs. I'll be taking my GRE in a couple of weeks and planning to submit my applications to at least 2 programs in my State. Your article served to both frighten and excite me.

Sure would love to see the part 2 you promised!

Specializes in Oncology.

Hello there!!

I have just begun an MSN FNP specialty track and I am too considering a PhD. Reading your blog was very inspiring!!! I can't wait for part 2!!

Hi VickyRN,

I read the blog on your PhD journey, such a beautiful write up, realistic and detailed. I searched for part 2 of it and could not find it. Is it because you are still working on it, or is it because I am not looking hard enough? Please share the link with me if you did publish it.

I appreciate you taking time to write your experiences, I am currently in my PMHNP program and am doing my search for a PhD program that would be a good fit for me.

I am willing to relocate to find the best fit. I don't want a major city as Manhattan, Seattle or SF, but a smaller city as Philly or Baltimore would be great for me an family. Hence would love to look into John Hopkins or UPenn, I know I am being ambitious here, but I have learned to dream big to achieve what I have so far achieved.

I would like to find a program with nurse scientist/research focus, I know there are a few programs that are educator focus, that is really not my interest, even though I understand I would have have educator skills through the process (but not the primary focus for me). I understand the importance of having the in person contact with your cohort and professors, hence I have almost ruled out online programs except MUSC and UT Denton, which I have heard good reviews about.

I will continue to look for programs with faculty with mental health focus specifically child and adolescent mental health (Johns Hopkins post doc fellowship in child and adolescent mental health research hence looks great for that).

I am sure you did your fair share of research on best programs available. Hence if you have any gems you could to share, I would highly appreciate it.

Thanks in advance and I highly appreciate you taking time to help other in this wonderful journey of caring that we are all in!

Regards

Lakshmi Nair

Thank you for all that information. Can I ask what was the subject matter of the oral candidacy exam?

Specializes in Nurse Scientist-Research.

I see Vicky hasn't checked in to this site in a couple of years. Since my earlier posting I have completed all PhD coursework and passed Comprehensive Qualifying Exams (equivalent of "orals"). At my university once you pass "comps", you form your committee and writes your dissertation research proposal. Then you defend your proposal before your committee. If approved, you then are able to apply for candidacy. I am at that stage now. My next steps are to submit my proposal to the IRB and await approval for them (my research will qualify as for exempt or expedited review). I am going with a qualitative study using Classical Grounded Theory. The plan at this stage is that my study should take approximately 1 year from recruitment of participants to final write up and defending before my committee.

Someone asked what were the topics covered in "orals". So the exam I took was all written, at a testing center and limited to 5.5 hours. We were able to bring any and all resources such as books and notes and we had access to the internet. It was still the hardest exam I have ever seen in my life. It was split into 2 sections, one qualitative, one quantitative. It covered pretty much everything we had taken as coursework. Statistical methods, research design, and most of all critical analysis of existing research. We were given 2 articles the day before the exam and urged to break these studies down using a critique form we had practiced with for the last year. Then the questions were things like: On the Smith & Jones study, was the sample appropriate to the research question? Did the researchers address potential type I or type II errors? Could a different recruiting method have rendered a more representative sample? Were the conclusions justified? And of course, if you gave a simple yes/no question, that would have gotten you zero credit for the question.

On the qualitative study they asked questions more appropriate to qual like "Did the researchers address trustworthiness and if they did, which model did they follow?". Did the researchers adhere to any specific theoretical model (not necessary in many qualitative methods)? What were the recruiting methods for participants and were they appropriate to the stated method? Were the analysis methods consistent with the stated method? Could there have been a more useful qualitative method for the research question? State 3 PICO questions one could generate from this study to enhance knowledge on the phenomenon of interest.