Published Aug 20, 2011
abbaking
441 Posts
I prefer the title LPN - but i have always wondered why Texas and California have this inferiority complex and call it LVN. 48 other states can get by just fine with what it is mostly known as but cali and texas call it vocational.
Its just me perhaps but i relish LPN as a title - its sounds better to me than Vocational - in my mind vocational sounds a little too much like a nun or a priest
Karl Farmer
308 Posts
Practical nursing, educationally speaking, is a vocational program. But the LVN thing is the registered nursemindset of seperating 'professional' nurses, from 'those others'. Interesting, isn't it- that LPNs/LVNS are not considered as 'professional nurses', but can be disciplined for the BON for 'unprofessional' conduct.
andreasmom02
372 Posts
At the college I attended, the LPN's could bridge over to the RN easier than an LVN. LVN's were taught at a local vocational school, and didn't have as many college credit courses. The LPN's took all of the same courses to be an RN, but lacked two nursing courses that the RN's had. So I guess my point is that in the state I got my LPN diploma in, there was an actuall difference between the two.. lol I guess it varies state by state. Thanks to that LPN program, I only need 2 more classes to be an RN. I prefer to be called LPN as well... lol
TheCommuter, BSN, RN
102 Articles; 27,612 Posts
LPN and LVN are one and the same. California and Texas refer to their basic nurses as LVNs, whereas the remaining 48 states refer to their basic nurses as LPNs.
SE_BSN_RN, BSN
805 Posts
LPN/LVN. Same thing.