Doesn't it just drive you insane when someone tells you that Mr. Smith's O2 STAT is 96%?
It's O2 SAT people! Sat, short for saturation. I even hear respiratory therapists saying this. I am sooooo tempted to say something next time, but I know it's just petty, so I needed to vent here. Thank you.
Y'all are buzzing so far over my head I feel like looking for a vapor trail.
And it's been many a long year since I wrote anything but a well punctuated email or folded thank you note. I do like to write with a fountain pen if that adds any class to the act. LOL
Back to the nitty gritty OK?
If you want people to pay attention to your writing, you have to present your ideas in a logical manner and within context. Generally, in an academic setting the point is to synthesize and extrapolate from the pool of knowledge to either the specific situation you are describing, or to unite several strands of knowledge. It's not that you're not supposed to have original thought, but you're not an expert in the subject, or you wouldn't be in the class. Therefore, you have to show at least a familiarity with if not an understanding of the relevant literature. If it looks like you're making it up from whole cloth, where's the credibility?
Very true, but the paranoia still exists, a result of convenient cut and paste research. I personally have no problem with citation. It shows that one has taken the time to explore the subject before forming an opinion. I learned back as an undergrad what was expected, and I learned to enjoy writing research papers.
Grad school was different, but I took several classes at other schools to transfer in and I think that I was particularly lucky to have found a program that encouraged original thought, because the other schools did not. It seems to be a result of the general culture of the particular school as to whether they emphasize scholarly research or creativity, at least in my experience.
Shall we move on?
Very true, but the paranoia still exists, a result of convenient cut and paste research. I personally have no problem with citation. It shows that one has taken the time to explore the subject before forming an opinion. I learned back as an undergrad what was expected, and I learned to enjoy writing research papers.Grad school was different, but I took several classes at other schools to transfer in and I think that I was particularly lucky to have found a program that encouraged original thought, because the other schools did not. It seems to be a result of the general culture of the particular school as to whether they emphasize scholarly research or creativity, at least in my experience.
Shall we move on?
Humble apologies for dragging the thread off point. I'm afraid I just got some major buttons hit.
That said, I will still note that of the essences of communication is to bring the reader/listener along your train of thought -- one which is followed better if it involves logic and the correct usage and pronunciation of the chosen words.
There -- back on point, kind of?
Here's one that makes me crazy, although the utterer is my mom: she calls it "i-boo-pro-pin."
Maybe the drug manufacturers should use the pronunciation spelling of their drugs to teach us how to say them correctly! I am not sure how, at least theoretically, there can be a correct way to pronounce drug names since they are made up and are not official words. The pronunciation then becomes correct only as according to the person who invented the name. Maybe if they showed us how they want us to say metoprolol or whatever, then we could be sure to get it right. If my name was Smith and I wanted you to pronounce it with a long I, I might spell it with a long vowel mark above the i. They could do this with the generic names, which are always tongue-twisters to say. What is with those long generic names anyway? Don't get me started.
Maybe the drug manufacturers should use the pronunciation spelling of their drugs to teach us how to say them correctly! I am not sure how, at least theoretically, there can be a correct way to pronounce drug names since they are made up and are not official words. The pronunciation then becomes correct only as according to the person who invented the name. Maybe if they showed us how they want us to say metoprolol or whatever, then we could be sure to get it right. If my name was Smith and I wanted you to pronounce it with a long I, I might spell it with a long vowel mark above the i. They could do this with the generic names, which are always tongue-twisters to say. What is with those long generic names anyway? Don't get me started.
Actually Levaquin is shown with a long e on the packaging, yet interestingly, most nurses I work with pronounce it with a short e. Go figure!
I use my Davis's Drug Guide for Nurses...it gives the pronounciation.
Actually Levaquin is shown with a long e on the packaging, yet interestingly, most nurses I work with pronounce it with a short e. Go figure!I use my Davis's Drug Guide for Nurses...it gives the pronounciation.
Thats why for the most part I use the part of the drug name I can pronounce like "Tylenol, Coumadin, Lovenox, etc" LOLOLOL the patient usually doesn't know what the generic one is most of the time anyways--so if I use the one they know it makes them happy :)
marachne
349 Posts
If you want people to pay attention to your writing, you have to present your ideas in a logical manner and within context. Generally, in an academic setting the point is to synthesize and extrapolate from the pool of knowledge to either the specific situation you are describing, or to unite several strands of knowledge. It's not that you're not supposed to have original thought, but you're not an expert in the subject, or you wouldn't be in the class. Therefore, you have to show at least a familiarity with if not an understanding of the relevant literature. If it looks like you're making it up from whole cloth, where's the credibility?