I'm not new here, but my profile is. I'm posting for feedback - at the risk of criticism of course - from folks who are currently in the field as practitioners. I'd fish for feedback with colleagues in real life, but to be honest I'd rather not reveal my thoughts so honestly with those among whom I work. Take that for what you will. Also - as a premise for this post, based on my observations, it is assumed that, despite differences in education and philosophy of practice, PAs and NPs are essentially clinically equivalent.
I'm a former military combat medic. I got out, got a bs in biology, then went to work for a very large hospital network in health admin to feed my family while figuring out my next move. I considered medical school until deterred by the reality of spending the next 10-15 years of my life sacrificing time with my family. So I applied to and interviewed for pa school. What I learned during my time in that rat race was that the vast majority of my competition was actually well suited to sit for the mcat and apply for med school. The pa applicant pool is saturated with overqualified young professionals who made my combat medic experience and top-10% bio degree grades look inadequate.
Over a year later, I've changed my tune and am going into nursing, with the purpose of getting into an np program as soon as I can. I found a scholarship program that will pay my tuition and give me a living stipend so I can make my mortgage and feed my wife and kids. Here are the reasons I decided to on this path:
- First and foremost (given the anonymous nature of the internet I can say this, otherwise I would never mention it), this is the route of least resistance to becoming a provider. My local university's np program is part time over a 4-6 year period while working as an rn. The two big benefits here are 1) not sacrificing as much time with my young kids and 2) I don't have to move (no local pa program).
- I don't care about the money, I have relatively little school debt and it will all be forgiven anyways before it's paid off
- I don't care about clinical prestige. Working as an administrator who approves interhospital transfers has demystified the average physician, revealing that many lack a lot of common sense and/or are very narrow minded and can't understand very basic tenets of authorization and eligibility.
- As mentioned above, the pa applicant pool is saturated with young adults who are otherwise well suited to study and sit for the mcat. Were I to re-apply as a more competitive applicant, I would need more classes and more volunteering and application bullet points...at which point I may as well spend that time studying and sitting for the mcat. I interviewed at average/below average pa schools whose rates of acceptance were less than 6%. That's Harvard and Mayo med territory.
- A common theme on the pa forums is comparing the pa lobby to the nursing lobby, the latter of which is consistently deemed to have much more weight and heft. This to me bodes well for advanced practice nurses because the pa profession is essentially owned by the AMA, and why would physicians lobby to give the pa profession more autonomy, thereby replacing themselves in the clinic? Oversimplification but I state this to highlight the overall philosophy of comparing the two lobbies and potential futures with respect to autonomy.
- The largest hospital network in the country (the world?), the VA, is increasingly eschewing state restrictions for NPs and granting more autonomy of practice, albeit mostly for primary care and mental health. Pay still lags slightly behind PAs as can be seen in the private/public sector, but again I don't care about money (to a degree). The state I live in, for example, is restrictive regarding NPs prescribing controlled substances, but NPs at the local VA do not have this restriction.
- The longer I spend reading the opinions of and conversing with older PAs, the more grim the outlook is relative to NPs, and this is considering the aforementioned pay advantage. Though this could change in the future as non-physician practitioners are more heavily relied upon to fill the huge gaps in care with respect to the baby boomers, I would choose the profession with the better lobby at the moment which is nursing.
I completely understand the criticisms against my premise, and have no problem hearing out those who think that taking the path of least resistance is deplorable. I get it; but society has opened up and endorsed this pathway to practicing medicine and I plan on taking advantage of it. Feedback of those deep in the profession is greatly appreciated.
Edit for clarity: my bsn application is under review right now, I am not currently a nurse and hope to start during the fall '17 semester.