Published
This is an open ended, rhetorical question for anyone who is in management that used to be a regular staff/floor nurse. This is for those nurses who used to be one of the girls and who would get their butts beat down in the trenches on a regular basis alongside his or her coworkers and who then accepted positions of leadership such as charge nurse, nurse manager, dept. head, administrator etc..
I have to ask collectively, what happened to you? Why did you sell out? Was it really worth the few extra bucks thrown your way? Or is it that you are so insecure about yourself that the crumbs of power thrown your way along with your meaningless title somehow make you feel better about yourself?
I keep hearing about how the costs of healthcare have risen 20% every year for the last five years now. But relative to inflation, my overall compensation has actually dropped a bit when you factor in increased deductions for my benefits. Therefore, I think I am quite right in saying that the rising costs of medical care are not my fault. Yet somehow, I am the one who is being asked to make up for those rising costs in the form of increased patient loads, having to do more work with less resources and being basically told to shut up and be a "team player" lest someone else need to be found who will do the same work with a smile.
Whose idea was it to shift the burden for data entry to the nursing staff under the guise of "computerized charting"? When you tell me it is computerized charting, what that means to me is that I chart my assessments, interventions and outcomes on a computer as opposed to on paper. Instead, what I am finding, both from my own experience and from those of my peers is that we now have to do both because there is no way I can explain to a jury what I saw, what I did and what happened as a result of my observations/actions using the computer programs you are forcing me to use. Although, I am sure there are more than a few coding and data entry specialists off your payroll now. When you were a floor nurse, would you have been dancing around, bubbling with excitement about having to essentially do double charting? Then why are you so surprised that I am not?
Have you not realized that as medicine has become more advanced and specialized, so too has nursing? When you were working on the floor, were you comfortable with having a co-worker who only works in an ER setting and had never even been orientated to your unit? Were you comfortable being floated to a critical care setting when you had no critical care experience? This attitude and mentality that an RN is an RN and can do anything required of an RN is just insane. Having an ER nurse float to a dialysis floor with no experience is akin to having an ENT doctor working in the Cardiac Cath. Lab for the day. It is unheard of. It would not happen. Yet it is just fine and dandy for your RN's to be shafted like this. Don't you remember when that would happen and you would roll your eyes, shake your head and complain to the brick walls above you wearing the suits? Now you are in the unique position of having a say about things like this, you're the one wearing the suit and yet you do nothing! Is there a part of you that still cares?
When your boss tells you that in order to save money, support staff will be cut and your nurses will have to pick up the slack, why do you roll over and say nothing? Remember how annoying it was when a housekeeper would call out sick on your shift and you would either have to hide the messes or simply clean it up on top of your regular patient care responsibilities? Then why is it that you are OK with the wholesale cutting of support staff to save money and shifting that burden to the nurses. I know that you have responsibilities to your bosses and to your budget and I actually do respect that. But, just as you work FOR the people above you, remember that you also work FOR the people below you as well.
Nursing is consistently ranked as the top most trusted profession, not only in this country, but in the world. And for good reason. For most people, the word "Nurse" implies a trust and a sacred bond. Peoples lives and wellbeing are quite literally in our hands. From my own personal perspective, I feel that I have a duty to uphold that perception of trust for the sake of my chosen profession. I find it abhorrent to have to do anything that may lessen that perception in the eyes of the people I serve. I have very serious concerns when I am told that I need to do things like collect billing, contact and insurance information or I need to escort the patient to a co-payment collection desk, even if it is at the end of their visit. I see the possibility of people then wondering where my true loyalties lie. Is it to the patients wellbeing or to the account's receivable department? Can you, as a boss, at least see where I am coming from on this? Or is that twenty bucks really more important than the trust that has been painstakingly earned over the last century? I still remember back to my nursing 1 class when I learned that even up to the mid 1800's, whores and hookers who were convicted in the courts were still given the option of 6 months in jail or 6 months labor in a hospital as a nurse.
When did public relations and marketing become a larger part of nursing responsibilities? At my soon to be former hospital, the nurses are required to make follow up calls within 24 hours of a patient being discharged. I was told we have to do this because it has been proven to raise scores on patient satisfaction surveys. So in essence, you are not interested in the patient's opinion of their stay here, your are interested in their overall perception of our facility in general. Basically, you are just peachy in "queering up" the numbers as long as they look better in the end. Looking at this from a broader sense, to what end does that accomplish? Say you do eventually get the high score, say you actually find yourself ahead of Mr. and Mrs. Jones, what do you win that justifies whoring out your nurses for cheap and tawdry marketing gimmicks? Getting back to the point of this rant, would this have been acceptable when you were working on the floor? Would you have rolled out of bed and celebrated the fact that on top of patient care, you also got to call back all the patients you discharged yesterday? I didn't think so.
Along with that pay raise and your added responsibilities, you were also given a title when you moved up the ladder. Remember when one of your co-workers was promoted and then morphed into a complete jerk who could not be approached or questioned lest you be accused of being disrespectful? Is that you? Because if it is, I will remind you that while I do have to give at least a token amount of respect to your title, I do not have to give you, personally, any respect what so ever. If you want respect, you have to earn it. Don't worry, it really is not all that hard to do. I would suggest starting by respecting the professionals you are charged to provide leadership for. You have no idea how far basic human respect and courtesy go.
Do you recall how hard it was to get your license? Remember how precious it was when you got it in your hands? Remember your more seasoned co-workers telling you to be careful in what you do so that it may not be suspended or revoked and wondering and even being a little anxious about that? I certainly do. Now that you are above that, why is it OK now, for you to put those licensed professionals below you in precarious licensure situations by winking at dangerous staffing levels, decreasing support and eliminating resources to save money? Before you think to yourself that you are not that type of manager, I will ask you if you are willing to personally take responsibility for those cost saving measures? If you are, good for you! But until I see, in writing, a policy stating that those in charge are fully and solely responsible for situations that arise from those cost saving measures, then you are little more than a blowhard hypocrite in my eyes. I know that, should push come to shove, you will be the one signing the letter that details my incompetence to my nursing board. You will write how I neglected my patient to their detriment and conveniently omit the fact that you were the one gave me a 10 patient, high acuity assignment with little or no help. And to hearken back, yet again, to the point of this, were you cool with situations like this when you were faced with them on the floor?
From my overall perspective, the problems now in nursing can be traced to two main things. The great redesign debacle of the 80's and 90's where experienced and seasoned nurses were forced out in favor of younger and cheaper nurses and their wholly inadequate support staff. This caused 2 ill turns of fortune in our profession. It embittered a lot of experienced nurses who were forced out of their good paying jobs and in which they were expert in doing. Even to the point where, by word of mouth, they discouraged many younger people to avoid this honored profession. It also led to early burnout and embittered those left behind who were expected to take a huge responsibility with ridiculously inadequate support. We are paying for that not only now but will pay for it for a for a long time to come. The other thing currently conspiring against nursing is the influence of HMO's. To that end, don't blame me because you, the hospital administrator except below cost compensation for the care that is provided for their paying customers. In my opinion, the 20% annual increase in health care costs, in large part, are going mostly towards Wall Street in the form of profits, dividends and excessive compensation. I would like to avoid terms like pillage, profiteering and exploitation but no better ones come to mind.
Do you see the common denominator in my perception? They way I see it, more and more, patient care is being dictated by accountants who have never touched a patient in their lives save for reaching around them and grabbing hold of their wallet. Why is it that way? Why do you let that happen? Why do you go along with everything they say? You, my former comrades in arms, are increasingly acting like little more than the impotent, minion mouthpiece you have collectively become. Increasingly, selling out your own.
If, dear boss, this is you, may you choke on those 30 pieces of silver you sold your passion, loyalty and very soul for. I may be overworked, unappreciated and underpaid, but at least I can still look in a mirror and see a person of integrity staring back.
Just after Sept 11, I was in an English class and my professor asked "Those people who blew up the towers, they were evil people, right?, they were monsters, weren't they?" The class fell for it an agreed that they were all monsters. And she went on, "lucky for them, because if they were not inherently bad we could have expected more of them but this way, they never have to worry about our forgive." She explained that when you take someone's humanity away, you basically forgive the actions because nothing better was expected of them. Monsters will be monsters; and those without souls will be without souls.
9/11 isn't a proper parallel to this discussion and your English professor is a typical socialist apologist for the United States. I don't need her apologies. I'm proud of who we are.
Regarding terrorists and your English Prof's comments: I just want to take their humanity away literally (not figuratively). Period. I don't really care about forgiving them or not; I only care about ending their ability to continue to offend.
I'm sorry, the 19 terrorists that attacked the WTC and Pentagon didn't do it because I wasn't touchy-feely enough in my understanding of them. As if. They did so because their form of Islam (wahabism) dictates that all non-wahabis be converted, subjugated, or exterminated. And they don't see America as potential fields for mass conversion, or militarily weak enough to subjugate. This isn't just a war against American/Western values. They are killing fellow muslims w/ disregard in Iraq, not because those muslims are supporting America, but because they are non-wahabi, and therefore expendable. Mainstream Islam has as much to fear from these zealots as America.
~faith,
Timothy.
you know what's even sadder? they can't give hospital staff a raise--not just nurses, but everybody--but yet you read the quarterly reports of the big insurance companies and they make millions and billions in profits.....makes you kinda wonder
![]()
i think health insurance companies are a total waste of resources.
except for kaiser i can't think of any healthcare provided by these leeches.
they take in money, own huge buildings full of workers who process information and deny care. i want them out of business and their workers re- trained to do something useful.
I think health insurance companies are a total waste of resources.Except for Kaiser I can't think of any healthcare provided by these leeches.
They take in money, own huge buildings full of workers who process information and deny care. I want them out of business and their workers re- trained to do something useful.
But not if it means we hire government employees to do the same thing.
You know why teachers don't make squat? The gov't basically has a monopoly on their salaries. I don't want that for nursing. A short of supply means nothing if only one entity controls the demand.
You think having to implement admin's rules that are removed from the bedside is difficult? Washington is even further away from the bedside . . .
~faith,
Timothy.
I think health insurance companies are a total waste of resources.Except for Kaiser I can't think of any healthcare provided by these leeches.
They take in money, own huge buildings full of workers who process information and deny care. I want them out of business and their workers re- trained to do something useful.
Amen, Spacenurse! I used to be "one of them"...and got out, for it was like working in a sweatshop, and the work itself was SO damn impersonal, mindless and repetitious. It has taken me nearly eight months and the loss of my home, but I have FINALLY found a job in Case Management, my first love, where I hope to be able to impact and touch my patients' lives...instead of taking it away from them.
Timothy,
Maybe I was not clear. Really, I should have left out the context of Sept. 11; I considered it. The actual Sept. 11 had nothing to do with it!!
What she meant is once you consider a person a monster, that person is not liable for their actions. She is saying they are guilty but only a clear thinking HUMAN can be guilty, not a dog, not a monster. She wants them to pay but her argument is that these people can only pay the most dearly if we hold them up (for comparison) to the highest standard we can. Like if you compare a terrorist and monster, one will may better but not by much; if you compare 2 humans and one is a terrorist, the terrorist is undoubtedly much worse in comparison. She was not trying to apologize to terrorist, quite the opposite. Nor was she trying to say it was our fault. I really do not see where you got the idea that I was even trying to imply that. Only the terrorists are to blame for their actions.
About forgiving, she was NOT suggesting we forgive them; that was a poor choice of words on my part. What she meant is that THEY do not have to worry when we use this mentality. Honestly, we want terrorists to feel shame and guilt. That is what I am trying to get across.
My professor was actually generally quite right-winged in her thinking and you could not get socialist out of what she said. She said absolutely NOTHING about centralizing the economy or any part of it in that lecture or any other. I said I am a socialist and I am proud of that; she was a capitalist and I can respect her either way.
However, my point was valid. It was valid because of the theme which is what I really want to express, not some political conversation. When you call someone soul-less, you don't let them pay for their actions. You take away their right to feel guilt and shame. I was not clear on that but I thought it could be implied. I should have realized the mere mention of Sept. 11 would have distracted people from that idea.
I just wish I used a less politically charged example and I apologize if I have offended you or anyone else.
What about Medicare. Think we should dump it?
I strongly advocate closing both programs (SS and Medicare) to millionaires. They may have contributed also, but they contributed to a safety net. If they need the net, it's there. But as long as they're millionaires, they shouldn't partake. I participate in State Farm every month, but I only collect when I need it.
~faith,
Timothy.
I agree with you 100%.I strongly advocate closing both programs to millionaires. They may have contributed also, but they contributed to a safety net. If they need the net, it's there. But as long as their millionaires, they shouldn't partake. I participate in State Farm every month, but I only collect when I need it.~faith,
Timothy.
I know what she meant. She's a typical American University leftist apologist. And I still maintain that it's complete nonsense and garbage to stipulate that their actions are in any way predicated on how I view them.I didn't hurt their little feelings and this isn't a temper tantrum on their part as a result.
No, you still dont get it. SHE DID NOT SAY ANYTHING SIMILAR TO EITHER OF THESE TWO STATEMENTS!!!! I think you really would just want me to know how you feel about politics than to read what I have written. I give up.
Undecided7
94 Posts
I really have a problem with the "patients are customers" and customer service thing. For any of you out there that think we should do whatever the patients and families want and promptly respond to any want or desire- do you still work at the bedside- taking a full load- usually without an aid- in an acute care setting??? I really want to know. Where are you coming from????
We get a lot of confused patients, drug and ETOH addicts, and just plain "fruitcakes" as one of the doctors put it last night- and no, I'm not in a psych ward. We get diabetics that are more concerned about getting their soda and juice than the fact that the oxygen sat is 70% and they need to be on a bipap mask, or how about putting people in restraints so they don't pull the foley, IV, and feeding tube out and break a hip; how about telling someone with a BP of 214/104 with seizures that NO, he can't go down to smoke and if he insists- he can consider himself leaving AMA. The other night we had someone dying in one room (a code was called), and I kid you not- the lady in the next room wanted her juice and bedtime snack NOW and wanted her diaper changed NOW and someone to come in and talk to her. You know what? Until the higher ups want to staff us with better ratios and more help- customer service can kiss my ass. These patients are lucky to live through the night and should be GRATEFUL I bring the meds on time and monitor VS. PLEASE SOMEONE THAT WORKS LIKE THIS TELL ME THE CUSTOMER IS ALWAYS RIGHT.