I'm a critical nurse with 4-5 years experience. Just got my Cali license. I've been working with Travel Nurse Across America. I picked them because they had high ratings on multiple sites. But the examples of pay rates my recruiter has been sending me seem low. For example: Oakland ICU position at Kaiser starts at 20/hr. The "blended rate" ends up being like 24/hr. That's what I make in Michigan with a much lower cost of living!
M&I is about 31/day... That's around 11000 for a 13 week assignment if I go with their housing. There is a 1000 dollar travel reimbursement in that.
Am I being ripped off or does this seem like about the right starting point? I'm only still working with this recruiter because she has helped me from the start, but I'm not sure she's going to get more for me. Every time I tell her.. "look, I need more" her response is to be more flexible, after all.. it is your first travel job and it only lasts 13 weeks" I've been recently looking at other companies. Companies my friends have worked with. They offer a little better wages, but overall the with benefits and the tax advantages, it kind of looks pretty close.
I realize that as a first time traveler, I need to be flexible... any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
1.) It estimates (state and fed) tax, what if the state doesn't have income tax (you still have fed income tax)? Plus each state's income taxes are different!
2.) It calculates how much is your net pay per hour with housing stipend factor in. What if the housing in that area is sky high (there is a reason why some areas have higher stipends)? Great! Your net hourly is higher according to PanTravelers! Now show me the math equation on how you might potentially earn less because the housing in that area is expansive!
It is a calculator. There is no way that it can know what local housing costs. You have to determine housing costs in any case to calculate what the agency is actually paying you. Why would the housing stipend buy less housing that what the agency pays for? Not sure I get your point there. You could also pocket a lot more but the agency estimated take home won't include that.
What the agency is actually paying you is the point of the calculator. If you don't know the number, you cannot be sure that if you negotiate your compensation, for example to pay more for a housing stipend and a lower hourly, that your total compensation is the same. If you don't know the number, you also cannot compare another agency's offer in the same area or same hospital. If you are good with numbers, you don't need the calculator of course.
The estimated taxes do not affect the value of the calculator for figuring out what the agency actually pays you in total compensation. The only way to get your real take home pay is to give your home state (and local taxing authority if there is one - common in the Midwest), the work state, and your tax status and exemptions. The random agency you call doesn't know all that so their estimated take home is no better and leaves out vital information. Most travelers want to know their base rate if for nothing else than to know what their overtime base will be. They also want to know what their housing stipend is so they can look up local housing to see if they can pocket more money. The take home pay quoted by an agency does not tell them that.
That said, take home pay is an interesting number, and recruiters use it as a sales tool. It must work, because you bought it! But I have to say, you are the first traveler that I've read who has said they like it on a travel nurse forum. Most posts gripe about how recruiters are reluctant to tell them what their pay really is, just the take home. There are good reasons why they do that - because the base rate often sounds ludicrously low compared to a staff position.
my "blended" rate in CA has been around $40/hr for the past 2 years. I've done 8 assignments in CA. You should be making in the high 30s or low 40s. Lower in San Diego, like 20s. Try a different company.
And I take the company housing, so that's not included. I would bring home more if I took the stipend, obviously.
The big issue at Kaiser hospitals for travelers, especially new ones, is floating. Staff works 8s, travelers work 12s. Do the math and it is easy to be floated Q4. It will make you a better nurse but griping about it is to be expected.
Thank you, NedRN for the positive words. I did choose to go to Kaiser, Oakland, for the location and the experience. I have also heard mixed reviews. palmbeachRN... remember... it's only temporary. 13 weeks can be a long time if you make it that way. That's what I keep telling myself. This is my first travel assignment and I'm really not expecting to thoroughly enjoy everything about it. I experience cold feet every 15 minutes. I think this is part of why they say your first travel job is always the hardest. I am going to try to find the positive and make it the best experience I can.
Not really an inappropriate question if you post it on it's own thread.
However, it is not an easy question to answer. The best agency for you depends a lot on your own needs, wants, preferences, geographic area of interest, etc.
Post a thread with some of these details and you should get some answers.
letsgosavelives85- Let us know how you are liking Kaiser Oakland. I just got my Cali license and plan to start traveling in January. My recruiter keeps telling me Kaiser is 1st time travelers friendly...but like you, I've heard mixed reviews... biggest thing seems to be the floating. Good Luck! Cant wait to be on that side of the country. Can you PM?
Letsgosavelives and I work together at Oakland i enjoy it, of course we float a lot. That's what you do as a traveller. Be flexible! I have had an overall positive experience here.
i enjoy it, of course we float a lot. That's what you do as a traveller. Be flexible! I have had an overall positive experience here.
NedRN
1 Article; 5,785 Posts
It is a calculator. There is no way that it can know what local housing costs. You have to determine housing costs in any case to calculate what the agency is actually paying you. Why would the housing stipend buy less housing that what the agency pays for? Not sure I get your point there. You could also pocket a lot more but the agency estimated take home won't include that.
What the agency is actually paying you is the point of the calculator. If you don't know the number, you cannot be sure that if you negotiate your compensation, for example to pay more for a housing stipend and a lower hourly, that your total compensation is the same. If you don't know the number, you also cannot compare another agency's offer in the same area or same hospital. If you are good with numbers, you don't need the calculator of course.
The estimated taxes do not affect the value of the calculator for figuring out what the agency actually pays you in total compensation. The only way to get your real take home pay is to give your home state (and local taxing authority if there is one - common in the Midwest), the work state, and your tax status and exemptions. The random agency you call doesn't know all that so their estimated take home is no better and leaves out vital information. Most travelers want to know their base rate if for nothing else than to know what their overtime base will be. They also want to know what their housing stipend is so they can look up local housing to see if they can pocket more money. The take home pay quoted by an agency does not tell them that.
That said, take home pay is an interesting number, and recruiters use it as a sales tool. It must work, because you bought it! But I have to say, you are the first traveler that I've read who has said they like it on a travel nurse forum. Most posts gripe about how recruiters are reluctant to tell them what their pay really is, just the take home. There are good reasons why they do that - because the base rate often sounds ludicrously low compared to a staff position.