What % of women don't know basics of female anatomy?

Published

I had a wonderful daughter of an elderly patient assist with doing a minicath. I missed the first try, making some comment about getting the correct hole, and the confusion at times. The 60 something daughter said "2 holes?". I said something like, you know the pee and the baby hole?

The lady was shocked she had no idea there were two holes down there. I good naturedly covered up my utter surprise at her ignorance regarding this matter.

How many women don't know about this?

Soooo many.

And it's even worse among men.

I've had more than one person (male and female) express the believe that it's *impossible* to pee with a tampon in, because they believe urine is coming from above the insertion site of the tampon.

See also: the many men, including one in my high school health class, who steadfastly believe that it's both possible and desirable for a member to penetrate the cervix.

The labor and delivery department at my old hospital once had a young-but-grown patient pull her cervidil out because she thought she couldn't pee with it in. Of course, she didn't let her nurse know until the next morning when the nurse came to pull it herself. :rolleyes:

Specializes in Oncology; medical specialty website.
As a young child, I knew that I would never be able to have babies. You see, I knew that there were supposed to be three holes, the urethra, the lady parts, and the orifice. (My mom was a nurse; so we used medical terms like urinate and defecate. I remember my aunt asking me if I had to "go tinkles". I had no idea what she meant!)

Anyway, when I explored myself, I could only find two holes. Since I knew that I could urinate and defecate, I figured that I wouldn't be able to have babies.

Mom explained it all to me the night before THE MOVIE in 5th grade.

LOL @ "THE MOVIE."

LOL @ "THE MOVIE."

Oh yeah! I do remember that.

Specializes in Oncology; medical specialty website.
Oh yeah! I do remember that.

So do I. The boys seemed to have mysteriously disappeared from class, and then we were shown this extremely out-of-date movie (though not as bad as the Walt Disney story of menstruation), followed by "goodie bags" for we girls.

Re anatomy, I wonder how many were influenced by having a less visible urethral opening? We know we can have a hard time with a flash light and extra set of hands.

And I wonder why every anatomical drawing shows the urethral opening very external and anterior to the lady partsl opening?

Though that doesn't explain why some women don't know there is a separate opening even if they can't visualize their own.

FWIW, I grew up with a mom who prepare me for anything other than menstral cycles (and literally gave me a long pad with a belt even though self stick ones were available) but I was still curious enough to look for myself. I don't understand how someone wouldn't look in private.

Specializes in Nurse Leader specializing in Labor & Delivery.

And I wonder why every anatomical drawing shows the urethral opening very external and anterior to the lady partsl opening?

?

How else would they show it?

?

How else would they show it?

Representation of normal variety? To show how not everyone is made like a textbook?

Same goes for labia. Talk about something I didn't know about until labioplasties became more common and criticized in the media. Why don't posters better represent the normal range of anatomy?

Specializes in Nurse Leader specializing in Labor & Delivery.
Representation of normal variety? To show how not everyone is made like a textbook?

Same goes for labia. Talk about something I didn't know about until labioplasties became more common and criticized in the media. Why don't posters better represent the normal range of anatomy?

I guess because most textbooks and diagrams don't have the real estate to depict the entire spectrum of "normal" so they have to select a single representative.

I remember looking at a reproductive anatomy textbook (TEXTBOOK!!) and it showed "normal male genitalia" and the member was circumcised.

I guess because most textbooks and diagrams don't have the real estate to depict the entire spectrum of "normal" so they have to select a single representative.

I remember looking at a reproductive anatomy textbook (TEXTBOOK!!) and it showed "normal male genitalia" and the member was circumcised.

I think it is reasonable for a non clincical non curious women to not realize there is a separate urethral opening if it drains into the lady parts instead of externally. A mirror isn't going to help and a textbook is going to make them feel abnormal until someone tells them otherwise.

I remember the circumsized pics, that's crazy when you think about it.

FWIW, I grew up with a mom who prepare me for anything other than menstral cycles (and literally gave me a long pad with a belt even though self stick ones were available) but I was still curious enough to look for myself. I don't understand how someone wouldn't look in private.

My mom did a very perfunctory explanation to me. And she was a free spirit kind of gal. Married a few times, many boyfriends, kids with different dads. Hot pants and go-go boots and a long red wig when I was about 15.

One of the reason THIS conservative mom decided to be truthful, honest, and blunt with my own kids.

BTW - I never looked.

:blink:

Ye gods! & how is this really still happening, well into the 21st Century?

When I was a kid in sex-ed class in a progressive ( post-Spock/Kinsey et-al)

`70s coed high school, we boys were incredulous at the report that a significant

number of sexually mature women could not even orgasm, inc' by masturbation...

We had the 'hip' teacher on about the old research saw..

"95% of people admit they masturbate to orgasm, & 5% lie about not doing it"...

Men aren't any better. Had a patient tell me that he couldn't per earlier because he must have been sitting in his nuts. :banghead: Don't even get me me started on where men think their "prostrate" is.

+ Join the Discussion