Curious to some people's input on something. What are your thoughts on someone giving their medical recommendation for a patient they have never evaluated or treated when that recommendation goes against what a physician diagnosed and prescribed that has properly evaluated and screened a patient?
Additional details
Pediatric patient, 11 yo, screened for and diagnosed with combined type ADHD by his board certified pediatrician and started on methylphenidate.
Patient's mother, who was not present at appointment and did not participate in completing a screening form, disagreed with both the diagnosis and medication prescribed after the fact. She then went to a friend who is apparently a PA (I know this is the nursing board, but PAs and NPs have similar scopes and I am looking more for thoughts on ethicality) to ask their opinion. The PA is a pain clinic provider with no pediatric or psychiatric background. The PA then recommended that the patient not take the methylphenidate and instead recommended Strattera (did not prescribe it though).
So I am curious people's thoughts on where this falls on the ethics/professionalism spectrum. My thought process was that the physician was able to use the tools of screening forms to accurately diagnose and treat a disorder. Discussions were had between the physician and father of the child to make a correct choice of medication that fit the child's needs and situation. The PA knew very little about the child, his background, or his social situation and made a blind recommendation. That recommendation really could result in poor efficacy as well as reactions due to the child's medication compliance because of his social situation in his home life.
So I am just on the line of being unsure if the PA crossed the ethical line of making an uninformed recommendation or if it is more just unprofessional or poor judgement that they did so? Or maybe neither if you think so? Really would love any thoughts you all have!!
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Curious to some people's input on something. What are your thoughts on someone giving their medical recommendation for a patient they have never evaluated or treated when that recommendation goes against what a physician diagnosed and prescribed that has properly evaluated and screened a patient?
Additional details
Pediatric patient, 11 yo, screened for and diagnosed with combined type ADHD by his board certified pediatrician and started on methylphenidate.
Patient's mother, who was not present at appointment and did not participate in completing a screening form, disagreed with both the diagnosis and medication prescribed after the fact. She then went to a friend who is apparently a PA (I know this is the nursing board, but PAs and NPs have similar scopes and I am looking more for thoughts on ethicality) to ask their opinion. The PA is a pain clinic provider with no pediatric or psychiatric background. The PA then recommended that the patient not take the methylphenidate and instead recommended Strattera (did not prescribe it though).
So I am curious people's thoughts on where this falls on the ethics/professionalism spectrum. My thought process was that the physician was able to use the tools of screening forms to accurately diagnose and treat a disorder. Discussions were had between the physician and father of the child to make a correct choice of medication that fit the child's needs and situation. The PA knew very little about the child, his background, or his social situation and made a blind recommendation. That recommendation really could result in poor efficacy as well as reactions due to the child's medication compliance because of his social situation in his home life.
So I am just on the line of being unsure if the PA crossed the ethical line of making an uninformed recommendation or if it is more just unprofessional or poor judgement that they did so? Or maybe neither if you think so? Really would love any thoughts you all have!!