Published Apr 24, 2015
widi96
276 Posts
Hi all. I am working on our ED's testing and training for performing the role as a triage nurse. Since I am in the process of the education/testing, it has made me think a little more about some of the patients I see and triage. (Completing the triage testing, etc means we can work IN triage for those who walk in the front door - all ED nurses help check in ambulances and therefor triage those patients.) My question is . . . our educator is emphasizing that anything that requires immediate intervention is ESI 1 - which would include things like mental status changes secondary to low blood sugar. The immediate intervention being the administration of D50. So my question is . . . if this is a patient who was transported by EMS and they treated the hypoglycemia per their protocols - is the patient triaged based on report from EMS or the patient's presentation upon arrival to the ED? Had the patient been brought in the front door and ED staff were the first to see them - it would be a 1, however if the patient's glucose was improved and they were more with it upon arrival to the ED - is it based on what we first see? Despite already receiving the intervention?
amarilla, RN
318 Posts
Hmm. While I may not be one of the more eloquent posters here, I'll try to be succinct: I triage people in danger of dying or nearly dead as '1', indicating immediate lifesaving intervention needed, i.e., arrests brought in in progress. Emergent treatment - like reviving an altered hypoglycemic patient with D50 - I would still triage a 2. Urgent with many resources a 3 and so on.
In your example, I would triage the hypoglycemic patient who has already received interventions based on my assessment when I receive them. If that second finger stick on arrival is now 180 (from the D50) and they are awake/alert, they are a 3 and will be roomed accordingly unless there was a fall, LOC or some other issue at play dictating more immediate care (found down? poor vital signs?). I don't usually care how they looked an hour ago unless it's something like head injury or trauma which could have other implications, (internal injuries, shock etc) that may impact patient's status and resulting treatment going forward.
Just my opinion and will look forward to reading others'.
Anna Flaxis, BSN, RN
1 Article; 2,816 Posts
I would triage the patient in question based on what I first see- with the caveat that I will take into consideration the patient's presentation in the field as well as their risk of deterioration. Undertriage can delay needed medical evaluation and treatment, resulting in a bad outcome, while overtriage never hurt anybody. This person certainly wouldn't be a 1, because the immediate life saving intervention has already been done in the field- but I would make them a 2 due to being a high risk for rapid deterioration.
Sassy5d
558 Posts
Im sure there's a link on google somewhere for the official triage system of number ranking.
Many times that makes people's triage esi number higher, as in the cheeto eating c/o 10/10 pain would be a 2..
Technically, i would make hypoglycemia that needed d50 a 2.. High risk situation?? How long is d50 going to keep them alert?
Christy1019, ASN, RN
879 Posts
I agree with all the above posters in that I would triage them based on what I see, not what the situation was pre-hospital, unless they are an unresponsive post code etc. As for this situation, if they had overdosed on insulin and has a high likelihood of consistent, rebound hypogylycemia, I'd make them a 2. If it's a diabetic who just forgot to eat with their meds but is now A&O x 3 and fully capable of eating, I'd probably make them a 3. I hope that helps.
Altra, BSN, RN
6,255 Posts
You should be basing your own education and that which you are planning for your staff on the actual ESI handbook - it's dowloadable for free.
Short answer: ESI is based on s/s upon presentation to the ED, though the "backstory" of what went on pre-hospital can contribute to the risk assessment.
I do have the book and have actually already read it from cover to cover. Since the blood sugar was an example our educator had given in class in regards to someone who had walked in the front door - then experiencing the patient via EMS who had already been treated - wasn't something I had previously thought about - EMS treatment changing the triage level.