Published
I can understand her concern, but there are major differences between the educational process of NPs and CRNAs. To meet the standards for accreditation and for certification, there are strict requirements for the clinical experience for CRNAs. NPs require much less experience, and many NP programs have the student set up their own clinical experience. They accept NP students without establishment of the clinical experience. That just won't fly with CRNAs, and I think is a problem with NP education. It does allow NP programs to expand quickly and dramatically. A CRNA program has to establish clinical experience availability in all speciality areas of anesthesia prior to accepting a student which limits the growth of programs. Nursing deans don't like it because often the nurse anesthesia program in their college is the only graduate program turning away applicants. They want the tuition dollars and have asked the CRNA accreditors to 'prove' that all that clinical experience is necessary. CRNA educators feel strongly that it is, and are carefully guarding the CRNAs ability to regulate the CRNA educational process. I beleive there will continue to be a strong demand for CRNAs for the far into the future.
If more states license AA's, more AA schools open, and more CRNA schools open in response, yes we will hit a saturation point very quickly. It may happen sooner than most of you think. One day it's all great, and then next month the market goes off a cliff. Isn't that how most bubbles end?
I wouldnt think it would happen too soon with many CRNAs headed toward retirement (so I've heard). Having enough CRNA faculty can factor in - this is an issue that has hit nursing overall which drives the nsg shortage. Also I would think overall CRNA numbers only slowly climb with most programs only pumping out 15-30 students a year on avg. People will always need anesthesia svcs (esp with the baby boomers coming of age for incr health issues)- so I would think demand will continue to be great enough for the supply. Dont forget the cost-effectiveness of CRNAs over docs in this wonderful (sarcastically) economy we're in.
IMO
hbgwan, LPN, LVN
236 Posts
Hi everybody. I was speaking the other day with my nurse manager. She is thinking about CRNA school, but thinks that the market will soon be saturated like the NP market. She said at first the NP programs were selective and that jobs were plentiful after graduation. However, more and more programs pumped out more and more NP grads until job opportunities went down, right along with the salaries. She said she sees the same thing happening in the CRNA market.
Does anyone concur?
Thanks,
hbgwan