Published
Thanks for the reply. Seriously as soon as I posted this I walked out to the nurses station and found the information about why this happened, lol.
Apparently, our facility says that the trend is going to transfuse at 7 or below because the risk is higher than the benefit above 7. Not surprisingly it also has to do with the fact that medicare and other insurances won't pay for adverse events r/t transfusions that were unnecessary or errors made on the hospitals part.
Recent studies have been released showing increased mortality with blood transfusions. I know one study in particular related to cardiac surgery patients (my patient population) which is now the guidelines are surgeons follow. None of them transfuse based strictly on the numbers, the patient must be actively bleeding or symptomatic. Our facility has adopted new transfusion guidelines as well
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/549791
Here's one study...you have to sign up for meds ape but registration is free
We don't transfuse until they're
We have a fair number of pts with sickle cell trait who live around 9, so a fall to 7 postpartum/postop is not as big a jump as, say, 12 to 7, and they are able to compensate fairly well.
Blood is not on my list of favorites either, as I seem to have the black cloud of transfusion reaction hanging over me.
ukjenn231
228 Posts
I'm doing a travel assignment and the hospital just implemented a new policy that the critical Hgb value has changed to 7 they must fill out additional paperwork choosing from a list of approved indications. Just curious if anyone else has seen this and also what the rationale may be for not transfusing above 7. I haven't seen any inservicing for nurses on the policy in this facility.