Published
Yes, that seems to be common these days. Most places only require you to write vitals on the that transfusion form at the beginning and at the end of the transfusion. They don't want you standing there taking vitals q5 for 15 minutes anymore. Having seen a patient die during a blood transfusion from the blood transfusion - and it was horrible - I still tend to keep a close eye on any patient receiving blood.
Yes. Our facility policy is to remain at the patients side for the first 15 minutes but NO ONE does it. I said something to a girl who has been there 6 years and is part of shared leadership and she looked at me like I was nuts. It also says in our policy to "gently agitate the blood bag" every 30 minutes LOL.... No.
Thanks for the responses. Our policy states to stay for 15 minutes. (ICU). There is a clause regarding emergent/unit patients (which most of ours are) and changing assessment based on pt. condition, but I find that a hard way to say: "see, you don't have to stay..." If anything, I would think it would lead to more assessment, not less.
Exactly!For those of you who don't stay with the patient during the first 10-15 min, how do you observe the patient for signs of transfusion reaction during that time?
And I stay in the room when I start new IV ABT. I saw an acute allergic reax when I was a new GN and I don't want to ever go thru that again.
Baseline vitals, vitals after the first 15 min, vitals Q1H afterwards and then post-transfusion vitals. Sadly it seems like no one ever stays with the patient during the first 15 min. I always do. I don't care if they're hooked up to a monitor, I could very well get stuck in a different room for over 15 minutes. I feel much better having my own two eyeballs on the patient and besides, that is way I was taught and it's our policy.
valsalvamanuever2
38 Posts
Anyone work on a unit where the predominant attitude is one of it being ok to leave a pt. during the first 15 minutes of a blood transfusion due to the monitors attached to the pt.?