Published
It's a normal part of my daily assessment. it only takes a moment, and is important. I had a post op patient who had a large pulse deficiet and was transferred to a cardiac unit. He had new onset A-fib and did show other symptoms, dizziness etc, that other nurses dismissed as 'normal' with first time up after surgery. Glad I called the doc on it, few days later after meds did not work he was cardioverted.
It's the simple mundane and routine parts of an assessment that be the most important to our patients.
Helllllo Nurse, ( did I miss an l??), pulse pressure is the differnce between the systolic and diastolic pressure
The Apical/Radial assessment must be done with 2 people. At the same time, one nurse counts apical and one nurse counts radial for a full minute. If the radial rate is lower than the apical rate, the number of beats difference is a the pulse deficit. ( apical 80, radial 78 = pulse deficit of 2.) Yes, it indicates perfusion problems.
I don't see how you can do this technique/assessment alone.
But, I also have OFTEN checked a radial as I have listened to an apical and noted beats that did not perfuse to the wrist. That is different than the A/R assessment.
I'm trying to determine if the full minute, 2 person A/R assessment described above is still being done in the real world. If so, when and why and in what setting?
This is still being taught in nursing schools. The students that I see struggle with this...not with the concept or the significance of the findings, .....but with the actual synchronizing of the timing and counting apical and radial rates.
So, what do you all think???
boggle, ASN, RN
393 Posts
Remember learning to take an apical/ radial rate in school?.......2 nurses simultaneously counting the heart rate...one counting the apical while one counts the radial pulse....
Do any of you do this in practice? If so, what circumstances indicate this assessment is needed? Do you NEVER do it?
Thanks for your input!