Published
After Pearson made me wait for 45 minutes because they didn't see that I was registered (when I was)...
I had all 265 questions this morning in DC...5 hours from house.
Shouldn't have scheduled my exam 12 hours before I was to take it.... :trout:
I just searched the NCBSN site for info on the website and found this info:how the CAT works:
1) it measures your ability with a 95% certainty. It'll end the test whenever it reaches that mark.
2) if it never reaches that mark, you get all 265 questions. At that point, the 95% certainty standard is dropped. You pass or fail based on where your ability level measures without regard to the certainty rule.
The site said "the maximum test rule is essentially a second chance to pass" meaning I missed my first chance?!? The computer wasn't 95% sure I was passing so I got all questions. That's bad, right?!?!?
Not always, I have heard in years past that a certain number of people taking the test will, by chance, receive all questions as sort of a control group for the exam. These people may have actually passed the exam with 75, but received all 265 because they were that 1 out of 10 or 20 that needed to be a control. Think of it as a guinea pig for the NCLEX. Keep your chin up...
Not always, I have heard in years past that a certain number of people taking the test will, by chance, receive all questions as sort of a control group for the exam. These people may have actually passed the exam with 75, but received all 265 because they were that 1 out of 10 or 20 that needed to be a control. Think of it as a guinea pig for the NCLEX. Keep your chin up...
I've heard that same thing, but another poster here informed me that that was a rumor, and that it's not true. I'm not sure - I haven't heard from anyone who would know for sure (i.e. someone from NCLEX or Pearson). I heard that from my nursing instructors, so I believed it. Where did you hear it?
I've heard that same thing, but another poster here informed me that that was a rumor, and that it's not true. I'm not sure - I haven't heard from anyone who would know for sure (i.e. someone from NCLEX or Pearson). I heard that from my nursing instructors, so I believed it. Where did you hear it?
I can recall it from multiple sources...including fellow test takers, as well as my nursing instructors and preceptors...so I believed it as well.
I can recall it from multiple sources...including fellow test takers, as well as my nursing instructors and preceptors...so I believed it as well.
A moderator on another thread told me to visit the the NCSBN site, where I read a bulletin that states that this rumor is NOT true. There are no instances where candidates must take the full test despite their ability level as a "control". Too bad, because that was one of my last hopes that I passed. Getting all 265 IS a bad thing - it means that the computer didn't figure out with 95% certainty that were smart enough to pass or not. It means I was borderline the entire time...I'd rather be on one extreme or the other so I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that I was either meant to pass or not.
I had 265 questions, I passed, I'm just as much an RN as those lucky dogs who passed with 75 questions! I'm envious, the test took me 3+ hours, but not in the least disappointed or concerned about my level of knowledge.
The lady from Pearson told me the 265 question theory. I don't know, however, if it's true or not. It actually doesn't matter.
TNUp2Jen
69 Posts
I just searched the NCBSN site for info on the website and found this info:
how the CAT works:
1) it measures your ability with a 95% certainty. It'll end the test whenever it reaches that mark.
2) if it never reaches that mark, you get all 265 questions. At that point, the 95% certainty standard is dropped. You pass or fail based on where your ability level measures without regard to the certainty rule.
The site said "the maximum test rule is essentially a second chance to pass" meaning I missed my first chance?!? The computer wasn't 95% sure I was passing so I got all questions. That's bad, right?!?!?