When Does Life Begin? The Scientific Definition of an Abortifacient ...

Nursing Students Student Assist

Published

The question about what constitutes an abortifacient came to light with the latest Hobby Lobby SCOTUS decision. An abortifacient is a drug or device which terminates a human life after it has already begun. What do you think? Is this true?

Specializes in Critical Care.
Good day:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UH9yGVmN0hs destroys the left's arguments about the four (4) contraceptives in question as not being abortion related.

Thank you.

There isn't actually any evidence in that video to suggest these four drugs are abortifacients. She does refer to what was not ruled out in these drugs' FDA trials, which is the extent of their mechanism of action. The clinical trials for FDA approval of these four drugs weren't intended to completely rule out any effect that could be considered abortifacient, even by a conservative definition of the term, just like they didn't rule out that these drugs could give someone superpowers.

It's essentially equally accurate to claim these drugs could cause abortion as it is to claim they cause superpowers based on the pre-approval studies. As I pointed out earlier however, many subsequent studies have shown that these drugs do not actually work through abortifacient means, by any definition.

Specializes in Critical Care.
Good day:

If you take the time to watch the short video (unless you are completely afraid of facts), the end sources include SCOTUS, the government itself, the FDA.

Thank you.

The SCOTUS very clearly ruled that they do not consider these four drugs to be abortifacient or that such an argument can even be made.

The ACA specifically prohibits abortifacients from being covered in this manner, so there would have been no need to go through the trouble of deciding this based on RFRA, it would have been much easier for the conservative justices to simply point out the ACA does not allow such coverage.

A different federal law also prohibits federal funds from being used to cover abortifacients, so if there was even a question that these could be abortifacients they could not have ruled that the government should cover these four drugs on behalf of Hobby Lobby, which is what they ruled.

"Seems like the whole damn world's gone wrong.

Saint Joe McCarthy* is dead and gone.

How do I know? I read it in the Daily News.

Don't try to make me change my mind with facts.

To hell with the graduated income tax.

How do I know? I read it in the Daily News."

~ Tom Paxton

http://www.8notes.com/digital_tradition/midi_dtrad/DAILYNEW.midi

*another good Catholic white guy

+ Add a Comment