My TCU CPR policy - page 4
by unsaint77 | 6,892 Views | 41 Comments
Even for full code pts, my TCU CPR policy is not to do CPR if the pt is determined to be dead. The TCU protocol qualification for being dead is no pulse and no response to stimulus. (a person without pulse will not respond to... Read More
- 0May 3, '12 by PetsToPeopleQuote from AnonRNCI agree, if "obviously dead" was added to a policy, it would have to be defined, otherwise you would be opening yourself up to major liability because the facility would be able to pass the buck onto the nurse."Obviously dead" needs to be defined? How can you tell the difference between 3 minutes and 30 minutes dead?
- 3May 3, '12 by woohI think "obviously dead" is what the policy was trying to say, giving things like no pulse. Unfortunately, the criteria listed, such as no pulse, are the criteria for DOING CPR. I think the policy was probably written with good intent, just badly done.
- 6May 3, '12 by hherrnhhern, can you be more specific as to what you think I got wrong? Everything you said is EXACTLY what I know and what I think. Of course no pulse means no breathing and no pain response. Of course everything about this ridiculous.
My bad. I misunderstood you to believe that this policy allows fo chest compressions in some instances, which it it does not. (I understand that in a normal setting, the only time chest compression is needed is in the scenario described in #4)
The policy, as it reads, prohibits chest compressions at your facility.
I doubt this is intentional. You suspect some financial motivation, but that seems unlikely. God forbid any nurse actually follows this policy, the institution would incur a huge financial liabilty. And, I suspect the nurse would be liable as well. Look at it this way: If your institution had a policy of treating hypokalemia with a 1000 meq rapid push of K, you would be expected by your nursing board to not follow the policy.
In all likelyhood, the intention of this policy is to avoid un-needed CPR on coprses. A reasonable goal. I suspect the policy was written by an idiot. They are out there. And some of them are in charge.
- 0May 3, '12 by jlivermoreIf we are "theoretically" using lividity or rigor mortis as a determining factor here for a pt. who is "obviously dead" What are the chances here that you are going to find that person in this state if you are rounding and your CENA's are rounding within the required time frames? In my opinion, if you are doing your job, anyone with a full code should get CPR. Please keep in mind that I work in a small facility and we rehab our pts in the same area we house our acute patients. I have been called to pronounce a death in our long term care unit, where the person is "obviously dead" and rigor has set in, but in the end, these people are expected to pass and already have a DNR in place.
I as an RN, would never ever follow this policy. Unless I know this pt. is a no code, they are receiving CPR from my team until a doctor calls the code.
This policy needs to be seriously revoked or rewritten. I would, also, report this.
- 0May 22, '12 by jelly221,RNQuote from Enthused_Nurse2BAt my place, charge nurses in critical care can call it.Maybe they define licensed professional as a MD or paramedic? Those are really the only 2 who can legally declare someone dead, right? As a previous poster said, I would clarify with your facility on what exactly they mean and talk through some scenarios with them. For me, I would start CPR until a MD or paramedic gave the declaration.