Our Death-Denying Society (Revisited)

Americans are totally immersed in a death-defying, death-denying culture where the final outcome is often delayed by employing futile treatments and heroic measures. A cultural change needs to take place regarding issues surrounding death and dying because, even in the face of advanced medical technology and skilled interventions, every person in existence will die. Nurses Announcements Archive Article

Updated:  

Quote

Death is not the worst thing that can happen to a man.

Quote

Funny how you'll plan every aspect of every trip except the most important one you'll ever take.

Several high-profile instances of brain death have entered the public's awareness in recent weeks, including the painstakingly tragic demise of 13-year-old student Jahi McMath. Hence, now is the time to provide some basic education on brain death, and at the same time, scrutinize some commonly-held attitudes regarding the issues surrounding death and dying.

Simply put, the people of the United States are deeply engrossed in a death-defying, death-denying culture. Characteristics of this culture include an attitude of outright denial, the inability to openly discuss the topic of death, and misguided reliance on futile measures in spite of a terminal prognosis. However, the populace of this country was not always bathed in a collective state of denial.

In past times, death resulted in a sorrowful time for individuals whose loved ones succumbed. Dying was visible, expected, natural, out in the open, and an acceptable outcome. Death was a powerful affair that frequently involved the entire family: a person would die at home in the company of loving relatives who paid their final respects. The surviving family members would even give the post mortem care on the death bed.

In the present day, most deaths now take place in hospitals, nursing homes and other types of healthcare facilities. In the span of a few generations, the business of dying has been extricated from the home and conveniently transferred to institutionalized healthcare settings. American society has been doing a remarkable job of removing death from public view in the 21st century. Many people fear what they have not seen, so the invisibility of death makes it frightening in today's society.

The process of dying is a uniquely personal, unavoidable, intricate journey that every individual in existence will make when end of life approaches.

In a nutshell, brain death is the complete and permanent cessation of all brain function. It is important for the general public to understand that once the brain has died it will never, ever regain any function. Brain death is utterly irreversible; therefore, a patient who has been declared 'brain-dead' will not improve because he is dead. Contrary to misleading notions, brain death is not the same as a persistent vegetative state or a comatose state because the patient who is in a coma or PVS has some brain function, whereas the brain-dead patient has absolutely no brain function whatsoever (and never will).

No one has ever recovered from brain death. Ever. A brain-dead body might appear 'alive,' feel warm and appear to be resting, but these effects are the result of warming blankets, a ventilator, and medications to maintain the blood pressure. There is no medical treatment or intervention in existence that can reverse brain death. There is no miracle in existence that will restore cerebral function once a declaration of brain death is made. A brain-dead person is very much dead.

It is imperative that Americans have a national conversation about issues surrounding death and dying to clear up common misconceptions. However, in these bitterly politicized times, I doubt this conversation will take place anytime soon. Furthermore, a change needs to occur regarding our largely unrealistic views on death. Until Americans grasp that death is a natural and acceptable end to the circle of life, there will always be people who do everything humanly and technologically possible to evade the final outcome that every living individual will face.

Sometimes I wish there was some sort of national database that contained a living will filled out by each citizen, that had to be updated every year when you did your taxes or signed up for Medicare or something. A lot of people don't take the time/don't have the chance to officially declare his or her final wishes until it's too late. And by too late, I mean until someone else is making those decisions for them.

Also, I hate that DNR orders don't carry over from nursing homes. A patient will have signed DNR orders at a nursing home, get sent to the hospital and the orders don't carry over. If that person isn't alert, and their next-of-kin won't sign the papers, the patient's wishes aren't carried out. We had this happen a few weeks ago, I felt awful for that poor little lady when she coded.

Specializes in Pediatrics.
In my religion,I'm taught death isn't natural.

It wasn't apart of the first human condition(Adam and Eve didn't even know what it was before eating the fruit).

i find this very interesting. I'm not trying to be sarcastic or disrespectful, but are you saying that death is not supposed to happen?

All death is natural. However, The term "he died of natural causes" often baffles me. When your heart stops, you die. It's what causes tour heart to stop that is the cause of death. Even though her heart is currently beating, it DID stop in early December. Science and technology brought her back to "life" (or at least brought her heart back to life).

Regarding the Jahi McMath case, I found an interesting piece in the Los Angeles Times. In describing letters to the editor, the writer says, "... most readers expressed sympathy and compassion for the parents while encouraging them to acknowledge the painful fact that their daughter will not recover."

The sad saga of Jahi - latimes.com

Anyway, this is a great post. I am so tired of reading ignorant peoples comments about the thousands of brain dead people who came back to life. I seriously hope that others reading these comments do not believe such a thing.

I know this would never be possible, but, maybe if the general public actually saw pictures or video of this poor dead child, they could see what brain dead really means. Back when the Shiavo case was in the media, we saw videos of her. We could see she was not brain dead, but could clearly see her level of function.

You might feel reassured if you read the comments that follow this story about Jahi McMath.

Lawyer: Brain-dead teen Jahi McMath stabilizing after hospital move - CNN.com

There's no shortage of commenters who think that brain death means the person is dead.

Regarding brain-dead people waking up, one person cited this case:

Patient Wakes Up Right Before Doctors Remove Organs - ABC News

But even with that, several people weighed in with reasons why that was different from the McMath case (whether they are right I don't know).

I glanced at comments in the LA Times and HuffPo and found the same general trend -- people are sympathetic to the McMath family, but very few folks think they are doing the right thing.

In case anyone wonders why I've taken an interest in this discussion, it's because I was shocked that health care professionals didn't want to discuss death directly when my mom was ill. I did not and would not complain -- my mom's care was excellent and that's the main thing. What I suspected at the time, and this discussion has confirmed, was that they deal with a lot of crazed family members and were hesitant to be straightforward. We eventually had a superb hospice team, which of course made everything as good as it could be in the circumstances.

i find this very interesting. I'm not trying to be sarcastic or disrespectful, but are you saying that death is not supposed to happen?

All death is natural. However, The term "he died of natural causes" often baffles me. When your heart stops, you die. It's what causes tour heart to stop that is the cause of death. Even though her heart is currently beating, it DID stop in early December. Science and technology brought her back to "life" (or at least brought her heart back to life).

Yes,that's exactly what I'm saying(this is based on my religious beliefs,however).

Death isn't natural and wasn't meant to be apart of the human condition.

Until Adam and Eve ate the fruit,then of course death became what it is

Sometimes I wish there was some sort of national database that contained a living will filled out by each citizen, that had to be updated every year when you did your taxes or signed up for Medicare or something. A lot of people don't take the time/don't have the chance to officially declare his or her final wishes until it's too late. And by too late, I mean until someone else is making those decisions for them.

Also, I hate that DNR orders don't carry over from nursing homes. A patient will have signed DNR orders at a nursing home, get sent to the hospital and the orders don't carry over. If that person isn't alert, and their next-of-kin won't sign the papers, the patient's wishes aren't carried out. We had this happen a few weeks ago, I felt awful for that poor little lady when she coded.

THIS. This is an excellent idea. It's ridiculous that every time a patient is admitted they have to have a paper copy with them or their family has to bring it in. Who has time for that when they're critically ill?

Specializes in Adult M/S.

Recently we admitted an 88 yr old pt. It was his 4th admit in the past couple of months. When the Pts wife was asked about DNR status by the MD she asked him to do everything as long as it wouldn't hurt him. She asked if CPR hurt. The MD, with the admitting Rn in the room, said "not if it's done right"! The Rn just about fell over. When I picked up the Pt I initiated as gently as I could a conversation about CPR and it's effects on 88 yr old ribs. She thought for a moment and said I guess I'll have to talk with the doctor again. I don't know if she had that conversation but I hope she did. If she still wants CPR and full code status that's fine with me (not something I would do for myself or someone I loved) only as long as she's fully and correctly informed about the consequences.

I think most of us are in denial of death. When someone is brain dead and on vents, meds etc. we're not prolonging their life. They are already dead. I don't know what to call it. Keeping the organs functioning or something like that but it's not life. They are not going to wake up later because their brain function is gone and will not recover like a liver or kidney may recover after it takes a hit.

Specializes in Eventually Midwifery.
Human beings are not animals.

Yes, we are animals. Just because we have dolled up our culture and drastically changed the face of the planet does not change the fact that we are, in fact, animals. We are mammals, just like dogs, monkeys, whales, etc.

Specializes in PCU.
I'm not a nurse, so obviously my knowledge is very limited. But the determination to preserve life no matter what is not something I've ever seen or heard about from my friends or family. I'm at the age where parents, aunts and uncles are inevitably dying, and I've had many, many conversations with friends and relatives about end-of-life issues. I've never had the feeling that death should not be acknowledged or openly discussed.

Is it really true that this attitude is in all of society? I assume this article was written in response to a recent, highly-publicized case, and I'm sure that case and others like it are very distressing to health care professionals. I also assume there is a big difference in issues involving younger people -- my experiences as described above involved people in their 70s and 80s.

Again, I have no doubt that there are individual cases where people insist on preserving life inappropriately -- my question is about how widespread this attitude is. I also question whether it's true that most people don't know what "brain dead" means -- when someone I know died recently, everyone I discussed it with knew that "brain dead" meant no hope, and as far as I know the family stopped life support in a timely fashion.

As a nurse, I can vouch for what others are saying...it is becoming more and more predominant where families are turning down hospice and fighting till the very last breath to keep that life going, despite the misery and pain of the loved one...I have had them turn down hospice because the family or "the patient" is not ready to die yet (seriously? Hospice does not kill, it alleviates pain and provides support. Some patients even get better and leave Hospice. For those that don't, at least they have the services they need, as do their families).

I have had them tell me not to medicate their loved one (in spite the agony the person was enduring) because "it will make them sleepy." Or "they might get addicted." Or, "the pain isn't really that bad, they are just so used to the pain meds now." I beg to differ...I can see the pain in my patient's face, in the way they hold themselves, in the way they breathe...I see the misery in his/her face. I usually try to explain to the families that, if it were them in that bed I am sure they would want to be made as comfortable as we could make it and still be safe, but to let the person suffer needlessly is inhumane. Thank God so far they have all agreed that torture is not the way to go, but I fear the day I will encounter that one family member who thinks keeping the person awake to interact with the myriad people there visiting is more important than their final comfort...do we really want our final memories to be of excruciating agony as it can be with cancer? I know I do not.

I have had to watch my patients leak the fluids out of their skin because they are no longer able to process all the stuff being pumped into them. Their kidneys have failed, their heart is failing, their lungs are weakening...meds can only go so far and if resources of the body are exhausted, then meds can do nothing more...yet, they keep them going...God help me, if I am ever in that condition, please, please make me comfortable, keep me dry. Don't let me hurt. I love my life, but, when my time comes, let me make the transition with dignity and peace. Do not expect me to make small talk and chitchat if I am in pain. It breaks the heart some days to submit our poor patients to some of the procedures and treatments their families demand, even though we know that there is nothing more that can be done and we are just prolonging the pain. God help us all.

Specializes in PCU.
Yes,that's exactly what I'm saying(this is based on my religious beliefs,however).

Death isn't natural and wasn't meant to be apart of the human condition.

Until Adam and Eve ate the fruit,then of course death became what it is

So, under that premise, the body of this child Jahi should continue to be sustained, letting the heart beat, the nutrition be put into her, in spite of possible continuing decay, of fluids seeping through the skin because the body can no longer process them appropriately? Until and beyond the point where the brain begins to decay (liquefy is what some research suggests) because the blood flow in that area is substandard, if at all flowing)? (I think the studies said there was no blood flow).

I do not understand this thought process.

I worry about what the children of that particular family may be exposed to as they see their "alive" sister continue to decay. What will they think? What will they feel? What will they suffer through? This whole scenario just horrifies me. Sorry; I respect your religiosity, but for my own loved ones I hope I choose what is best for them, regardless of my own personal feelings, if the time ever comes and pray harder that I go before them so it never does.

Specializes in Pediatrics.

I wish I were tech savvy enough to insert a link here (via the app), but I'm not :(

Google the name Avonte Oquendo. A story that is local to me. An autistic boy (non-verbal, low functioning) who has been missing for 3 months. Some remains have been found, including clothing that he was reportedly wearing the day he went missing. And the parents are not believing it is him- until DNA results are officially back. I PRAY that once they are back, that they do accept it.

Again, I get that people don't want to believe that their loved ones are gone. It's devastating. Personally, I experienced a tragic loss at a fairly young age. It was more devastating for my parents (it was their child, my brother). While the phrase "I can't believe he's gone" was often uttered, never did I hear "I don't believe he's dead" by anyone close to us.

Maybe, because if what I do for a living, and because of my early experience with death, I just don't see it the way others do. Also, I worked in pediatric on lilacs, where it goes without saying that not everyone's journey ends happily.

Google the name Avonte Oquendo. A story that is local to me. An autistic boy (non-verbal, low functioning) who has been missing for 3 months. Some remains have been found, including clothing that he was reportedly wearing the day he went missing. And the parents are not believing it is him- until DNA results are officially back. I PRAY that once they are back, that they do accept it..

That is a tragic case -- but honestly, all we know is what their lawyer said to the press. We don't know what Avonte Oquendo's family really thinks.

In a highly-publicized case like this one I would probably make a statement similar to theirs -- give the tabloids an easy cliche to quote. And their lawyer did say "it’s not looking great."

Plus -- since you're local you will understand this -- think of how many bodies are pulled out of the East and Hudson Rivers. It's a common thing to see in a densely populated area. Always sad, but not shocking if you've lived here a while. It's VERY, VERY, VERY unlikely that someone else had similar clothing, but not impossible.

I would not criticize any family member for wanting DNA evidence in a situation like this -- I don't know if DNA testing is always done, but I have heard of it in similar cases. I can't imagine expecting a family to accept ID based exclusively on clothing. It's not explicitly stated, but the NYT story suggests that DNA testing was at the behest of the police -- not something the family insisted on.

Here's the Daily News story:

Avonte Oquendo's family cling to hope, await DNA tests as cops find second arm in Queens - NY Daily News

And from the NYT:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/18/nyregion/police-investigating-remains-found-in-queens-for-link-to-missing-autistic-boy.html?_r=0