What is Nsg Dx, and Why Should I Care?

Nurses General Nursing

Published

the following is from the nanda blog site, to which i commend your attention. http://nandainternational.typepad.com/nanda-international/

[h=3]what is nursing diagnosis - and why should i care?[/h] one of the most frequent questions we get goes something like this...."my patient has congestive heart failure. what is the highest priority/most likely nursing diagnosis?"

there is no right answer, because it's the wrong question! assigning a nursing diagnosis based on a medical diagnosis skips several steps essential to optimal and safe patient care. a medical diagnosis is only one piece of the puzzle; it does not by itself, provide the depth of information necessary to make an accurate nursing diagnosis.

what is a nursing diagnosis?

maybe the easiest thing is to start with what a nursing diagnosis is not.

a nursing diagnosis is not:

  • merely a label that you make up that "sounds like" it explains what you are seeing in your patient.
  • another way of explaining the medical diagnosis, or of renaming a medical condition.
  • something that "goes with a particular medical diagnosis".

nursing diagnosis is defined as "a clinical judgment about individual, family, or community experiences/responses to actual or potential health problems/life processes. a nursing diagnosis provides the basis for selection of nursing interventions to achieve outcomes for which the nurse has accountability." (herdman, 2012, p. 515).

in other words, a nursing diagnosis is a judgment based on a comprehensive nursing assessment. the medical diagnosis provides one important piece of data, but it does not provide anywhere near the depth of information necessary for making an accurate nursing diagnosis.

why should you care?

because an accurate nursing diagnosis based on a thorough assessment results in more effective and safer patient care. period.

let's take a look at an example:

a man is admitted through the emergency department with a medical diagnosis of viral pneumonia with the following profile:

  • age 78;
  • dyspneic and demonstrating very shallow breathing;
  • pulse oximeter is showing 90% on 4l of o2;
  • history of copd.

what is the primary nursing diagnosis? did you think of impaired gas exchange? seems obvious, doesn't it, considering the data and medical diagnosis? however, the question the nurse should ask is this: "what is causing the low spo2?"

after completing a thorough assessment, the nurse discusses her findings with the patient, including the very shallow breathing. she learns the patient is breathing shallowly because he's in pain. he's suffering from postherpetic neuralgia as a result of a very painful course of shingles. in this example, the assessment-based, primary nursing diagnosis is chronic pain.

consider these two scenarios:

nursing diagnosis linked to the medical diagnosis

a care plan is developed to address the nursing diagnosis of impaired gas exchange, based on the medical diagnosis of viral pneumonia. the posthepatic neuralgia as a cause for shallow breathing is not identified and overlooked in treatment.

or

nursing diagnosis linked to nursing assessment and critical thinking

a care plan is developed to address the nursing diagnosis of chronic pain, with treatment designed to resolve this as the primary cause of the shallow breathing, and to prevent recurrence.

which scenario provides the best patient care and outcome? what do you think the relationship is - or is not - between medical diagnosis and nursing diagnosis?

learn more

nanda-i 2012 conference: may 23-26, 2012

nanda-i nursing diagnoses: definitions and classifcation 2012-2014

nanda-i frequently-asked questions

nanda-i fact sheet

Specializes in Cardiac Care.
However, until those bozos (who love to talk about "evidence based" practice) remove that "Disturbed Energy Field" and associated nonsense I will continue to ignore them.

I will never forget the first time I saw "Disturbed Energy Field" in the list of NANDA diagnoses in my care plan text. I honestly thought it was a joke. For all the bellyaching and ******** we do to have the public, the physicians, the patients and others take us and our "profession" seriously, this makes us look like idiots.

Like Sue said, you don't need NANDA to use the nursing process.

moreover the nanda system does not cover all situations such as low magnesium level.

i'm pretty sure "electrolyte imbalance" is a nanda dx

Specializes in Chemo.

true but electrolyte imbalance is pretty wide and treatment is varies depending on the situation.

Specializes in Med Surg - Renal.
Like Sue said, you don't need NANDA to use the nursing process.

Totally agree.

The point is it's an unnecessary diagnosis. Just say low K+.

I don't need "injury, risk for, r/t impaired cognition a/e/b forgets limitations ." I know I have a demented, confused LOL who keeps forgetting she can't walk. I'm putting on the bed alarm and the rails up.

Specializes in nursing education.

The arcane, weird, nurse-only NANDA language is difficult to translate to anyone who has not gone through nursing school and had to write endless care plans based on NANDA diagnoses.

Formats like SBAR work for communicating across disciplines.

I usually lurk but this post caused my BP to rise. I'm actually flummoxed that someone is still a NANDA true believer. That and "synergy." My head is still shaking.

Specializes in ICU.
Yes, NANDA is kind of like someone who continually wants to change the subject in order to ignore the elephant in the room. No, I'm not saying that we should be diagnosing. BUT, to be a nurse you need to be 75% there... you need to work with a medical model and be well on your way understanding differentials. MDs and RNs need to be on the exact same page. I left NANDA when I left the NCLEX testing center.

I also think its an attempt to make nursing a "profession" because nurses have felt so belittled and feel the need to make the profession seem more important. Dont take that the wrong way, I just think these theorist try way to hard. I hate nursing diagnoses. Im sorry but when im on a rapid response call, im not going to be like, "hey Doc, Mr. So and So had impared oxygen exchange/ventilation, related to inefective respirations due to pneumonia". Or Mrs. So and So has ineffective cardiac output, as evidenced by weak pulses, and impared oxygenation due to excess fluid in the lungs as evidenced by low saturations and pink frothy sputum. " Seriously. Sometimes I hate what the nursing theorist try to do to nursing.

Specializes in ICU.

GrnTea, Im sorry, but I just can... not... bring myself to "like" your post. I just detest NANDA. The ONLY place I will willingly acknowledge the use of them is in school to help students learn to see the whole picture, but after that, nuh uh.

Specializes in Med-Surg; Telemetry; School Nurse pk-8.

"Most of the fundamental ideas of science are essentially simple, and may, as a rule, be expressed in language comprehensible to everyone." -- Albert Einstein

I've always felt that nsg dx language is the equivalence of pig-Latin.

"Most of the fundamental ideas of science are essentially simple, and may, as a rule, be expressed in language comprehensible to everyone." -- Albert Einstein

I've always felt that nsg dx language is the equivalence of pig-Latin.

My first LOL of the day!

So, NANDA is still out there jumping up and down, shouting, "Look at me! Look at me! I'm IMPORTANT!" How quaint.

+ Add a Comment