Top Ten Reasons for Being Fired - Falsification of Documentation

If you didn't document it, you didn't do it! This is a statement most nurses live by! Unfortunately there are nurses who document things they didn't do, which may result in harm or neglect to a patient. Subsequently this may lead to felony charges of falsifying medical records. Fines of up $25000 and 5 years in prison can occur if proven by documentation specialists. So not only could you lose your job, your license, you could lose your liberty. Nurses General Nursing Article

Falsification of documentation is number 6 on the list of 'Ten reasons why we get fired'

Documentation is a large part of a nurse's daily routine; everything we do, say or plan has to be documented. The greatest nurses saying has to be 'If you didn't document it, you didn't do it' this means we spend half if not more of the day documenting.

When I was training to be a nurse we were taught to assess, plan, implement and reassess. We were expected to document in the same manner, also providing the rationale to everything.

Today language may have changed but the basic principles are the same.

You should not document something you didn't do, for example if dispensing a medication to a patient you should not sign off on that medication until you have seen the patient take the med. There have been cases where RN's have signed off on medication yet the patient never received the med. This could have been due to genuine mistake or deliberate action.

Medications take a great deal of time out of the day; nursing is a fast pace environment and sometimes medications get missed. In some nursing environments if you are late or miss a medication there is potential to get disciplined, sometimes this results in nurses signing off on the medication and disposing of it so they do not get into trouble. This is falsification of documentation.

Another example of falsification of documentation is signing off saying you have completed something for the patient, it is either documented early before you have actually done it, or in rare cases something you have no intention of completing. You may have every intention of doing what you have documented but time runs away and it is not done. It is not best demonstrated practice to document in advance that you have completed a task when you have not done it! Do not document in advance, you may think you are saving time but in reality it is falsification of documentation. It is a bad habit and you need to stop: you will be terminated for falsification of documentation and reported to the BON.

Computer charting is able to detect actual time you documented, even when you change the time to fit in with your documentation there is a time stamp, so if a computer expert goes in to find out times and changes in the patients documentation they can pinpoint the actual time the information was documented. Remember if you are documenting late, always acknowledge this by stating "written in retrospect". Do not try to cover anything up! Everything is discoverable.

For example you state that a medication was given at 0715am, the pyxis dispenser shows the medication was actually dispensed at 0830am. Yet in your documentation you state the medication was given on time.

With paper charting is can be easier to detect falsification, if paperwork is missing then guilt is presumed. If you paper chart and make an error, draw a line through the error then date and initial. Medical experts will scrutinize the handwriting looking for differences, different ink used for alterations which are not done following correct procedure. Never leave a blank space when paper charting, if another nurse needs to complete her documentation they need to do so in retrospect. Leaving a blank space allows for falsification of documentation, unknowingly causing you to be a co-defendant.

These examples are things that occur daily in the hospital, they are not rare occurrences, nine times out of ten nobody notices, nothing disastrous occurs. It is not until something goes horribly wrong do we panic, overthink the situation and then make poor judgments.

In PA an LPN was prosecuted for taking a verbal order and transcribing it incorrectly, she was not prosecuted for the patients demise but for falsifying documentation

Quote
"Relevant Alleged Factsยจ In this first case of its kind in the nation, an LPN working in a Pennsylvania nursing home has been criminally charged with attempting to cover up a medication transcription error regarding a resident who later died.

The resident was admitted to the nursing home 4 weeks before her death. Allegedly during the resident's stay, the LPN received a verbal order to reduce the resident's anticoagulant medication. A short time thereafter, the resident's condition worsened, and the LPN realized that she failed to transcribe accurately the order to reduce the anticoagulant medication. The LPN then allegedly falsified the resident's medical record to indicate that the physician order had been implemented correctly. It was this alleged falsification of the medical record, not the initial error itself, which formed the basis for the criminal charges"

It is important to remember that falsification of documentation may not only result in the nurse being terminated it is a felony offense and viewed very seriously.

If you need to add or change previous documentation, you should not attempt to eliminate previous documentation but add to it by using the current time and it is suffice to acknowledge it is a late entry. The legal world knows that situations occur causing health care professionals to document in retrospect. What is not acceptable are attempts to cover up previous documentation.

Nurses must remember that the medical record is a legal document, and be very respectful of the power of their documentation.

Falsification of Medical Records

Detecting Tampering with Medical Records

Specializes in ED, ICU, PSYCH, PP, CEN.

Our hospital has a scan system for giving meds. First you scan the meds, then scan the patient, and hit enter so technically you have scanned that the meds have been given before the pt swallows them. So isn't that fraud? Sometimes a pt spits them out or they fall on the floor or something. So then I go back and chart that the med was damaged while being given.....Is there any other way to do this so I am not charting that I gave meds before I give them?

Ok. A thought. What if you know noss has a personal hated toward you and is looking for a reason? Other witnessed her threats with paper?

Specializes in RN, BSN, CHDN.

Can you expand more missmom?

I did document a urine color what I saw. Others witnessed whar I saw was accurate. Later holds it up saying I saving this for your eval. Catches me slipping then gloats. Tries to tag me on attendance first.

Specializes in RN, BSN, CHDN.

Have you talked with her to ask why she has this problem with you?

She refuses to speak to me. I know exactly why. I am human admit my mistakes. She will not. The whole favorites game. I have seen her set other up and other get away with much more. I am just glad I am not there and do not have to deal with it. Feel bad for those still there.

How ever I am finding out that that whole unit is massive terminations and still bad reviews.

Specializes in CCU, SICU, CVSICU, Precepting & Teaching.

Falsification of documentation seems to be the number one reason nurses get fired after they've successfully made it through that first year of practice. For one thing, it's objective. I may not be able to prove that your attitude sucks, but I can surely prove that you charted that Colace as given at 0800 when you didn't even get it out of the Pyxis until 0901. And it's easy to find "false documentation" because we all do it. We'll chart the Colace as given as we hand it to the patient, only to have him drop it and have to go find another one . . . we'll chart that treatment we did at 1000 when it was due because the fact that we actually weren't able to get around to it until 1130 is somewhat fuzzy in our brain at 1900. And we'll chart our assessments hours after they were done because that patient who needed to be reintubated took up so much of our time. So if management is looking for a solid reason to get rid of a problem employee, falsification of documentation is a good one to go after.

Years ago, I worked with a gentleman who would pull the curtains around his patient's bed, set his alarms tightly and then take a nap as soon as his patient went to sleep. Sometimes that nap lasted most of the shift. In the morning, he went into a frenzy of activity giving meds, doing treatments and charting. We all knew he did it, but none of us had cellphones, let alone cellphones with cameras. Electronic charting caught him out.

Falsification of documentation is the reason given for termination when the nurse has been diverting narcotics and it's difficult to catch or prove. If you're charting that you gave pain meds and your patients consistently insist that they didn't get them, you're vulnerable. I've known several nurses that were terminated and went straight to drug rehab.

For the most part, management is able to overlook the occaisional Colace, treatment or assessment charted incorrectly. But you'd better make the effort to make your practice solid, and that includes charting your treatments at the time you did them.

That is exactky what I am saying. I know I was preventing a fall. I see so much going on in that unit that I amso glad to be out of there. Thet was asking us to do things we are not allowed. I have the proof of that. I was so close to a transfer.

Specializes in Acute Care - Adult, Med Surg, Neuro.

Thanks for the advice. I am going to do my best now to charge when I did something at the time I did it. It's so hard though when you're pulled in a million directions, particularly at the beginning of the shift which is when I do most of my head-to-toe's.

I worried about that myself when I was giving scanned medications!

what can the organization do if this happens??

while a patient received an antibiotic for two days, the nurse charted nothing unusual. yet, on the third day the patient had an acute episode of shortness of breath and chest pain and died later died that same day. at the time of death documentation revealed that the patient had a dark red rash on his chest. An investigation into the cause of death was conducted and all the nurses who provided care during the three days were interviewed and asked whether they had seen the rash prior to the patient's death. none of the nurses remembered the rash. however, one nurse wrote a late entry for each of the first two days that the patient was receiving the antibiotic stating that there was no rash on those days. this is an incorrect late entry. her statement is part of the investigation conducted after the fact and was not omission from her original entry.