Critical Thinking Snapshot for Nurses&Students

Nurses General Nursing

Published

Patient: Mr. Jones

Mr. Jones, a 38-year-old white male with no known previous chronic illness, was admitted six hours ago after being involved in a single motor vehicle accident. He was the unbelted driver of a vehicle that skidded off the road and hit a tree at approximately 45mph. He reported losing consciousness at the scene. Mr. Jones was admitted in stable condition with a diagnosis of myocardial contusion and fractured ribs (4,5, & 6) on the left thorax.

Vital signs on admission were:

-BP 138/84

-P 80

-R 18

-T 98 degrees F.

Past Medical History: No chronic illness. No previous hospitalizations. No medications. Patient is a non-smoker and does not drink ETOH.

Family History: Father died at the age of 50 from a "heart attack". Mother is alive and has lung cancer. No siblings.

Patient: Mrs. Smith

Mrs. Smith, a 64-year-old female with known coronary artery disease, was admitted for coronary artery bypass surgery. Her risk factors for arteriosclerosis include a strong family history, smoking, and hypertension. She has been admitted to the CCU several times with angina. Cardiac catheterization demonstrated a high grade (>90%) stenosis of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. Surgery was performed 3 days ago with a left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft.

Mrs. Smith stayed in the Cardiovascular Surgical Intensive Care Unit (CVSICU) for two days. On the second day, her Swan-Ganz catheter was removed, IV medications tapered off, and her Foley catheter removed. On this, the third day, Mrs. Smith was transferred to the step-down unit with a heparin lock IV in place.

The Situation

Welcome to the night shift!

You are an experienced nurse working with three new graduate nurses on a 16-bed multitrauma acute care unit in a remote community hospital. You just finished receiving a brief report on your patients and return to the main nursing station to find two call lights activated. You answer both lights over the in-room intercom, asking the patients what they request.

Patient A, Mr. Jones, states that he is experiencing difficulty breathing.

Patient B, Mrs. Smith, states that she is experiencing chest pain.

Your shift is only 30 minutes old, and it appears that it will be a long night!

What would you like to do first?

Go and see Mr. Jones

Go and see Mrs. Smith

Review each patient's history

Call their Doctor

Go on Break

Reasoning?

Specializes in Gerontological, cardiac, med-surg, peds.

Betts, I liked this exercise. Gives me ideas for class. Keep it coming...

Specializes in Community Health Nurse.

Thumbs up Betts! I love reading patient scenarios and studying what should or should not be done for the patient as well as how to prioritize which patient is seen in which order. Great job! :nurse:

Specializes in Med-Surg.

I liked reading this too. I think we as students get very little information about prioritization. I have had questions related to a specific patient (like which of the following interventions should be done first, or what is the most important thing to teach) but very little about who should you check on first.

You are an experienced nurse working with three new graduate nurses on a 16-bed multitrauma acute care unit in a remote community hospital

How did these patients get to be here anyway?

I would have transferred them long ago!

Thank you so much Betts for this scenario! I read a similar scenario on a critical care nurse website (incidentally the field I would like to go into). I wish that school offered more case scenarios like this one. Just like those who posted earlier, I think the student nurse population would benefit from it. Thanks again :)

See Mr. Jones first and assess for poss PE.

Send another nurse to see Mrs. SmithTell the nurse to assess her and give nitro as ordered, if indicated.

I'm not trying to be funny. We were taught to assess each situation and intervene early enough to avoid these dilemma. Surely if you are "thinking critically" part of that critique would be to examine the scenario closely and decide what looks like a duck.

And the number of staff for this unit is very dangerous to start with. If you allowed yourself to be in this position, only one person will be responsible for any adverse outcome.

By the way my answer would still be to transfer them to a "safer" environment.

I would have never let the reporting nurse leave me "alone" with that ... she would have had an earfull from me as well for wanting to hand over such unstable patients .. why hasn't she/he called the doc?

I would have had her stay .. we would have taken one pat. each and I would have had one of the new grads call for the doc

thank you Betts for an excellent exercise, really got me thinking... SOB would have sent me to mr. jones first I think, not an easy call though

Betts, where did you get this question? Good question, good practice for a student for the NCLEX.

Although I have to say that I agree with the previous poster that suggested that this be moved to the student forum...I think it may be more well received in that venue.

Specializes in Med-Surg Nursing.
Originally posted by maxthecat

And the point of all this was????

Most of the nurses who post here seem to me to be professionals who are perfectly capable of using critical thinking in their daily dealings with patients/families. They are not children who need remedial case studies. Personally, I found the tone of this exercise condescending, and my guess as to why you received so few responses is that many other nurses felt the same way and didn't waste their time replying.

Ditto!

I work in a Trauma/Surgical/Cardiac ICU and Mr Smith would've been admitted there rather than a Gen Nursing floor at MY facility anyway. Cardiac contusions are unstable usually.

Thanks to all for posting but as I pointed out, this exercise wasn't to question anyones nursing knowledge or abilities. As for those that felt it condescending, say that to the nurses now in prison or lost their licenses for negligence resulting in the death of their pt.

It's on the tv, newspapers, lawyer ads, periodicals, and I could go on about deaths due to a nurses negligence. More than you think from situations such as above. I posted this with all good intentions of alerting my "Fellow Professionals" to be more scrupulous. I've 30+ years as a nurse, and continue to learn each and everyday as well as realize I too can make mistakes in judgement.

About this being posted in the General Nursing Thread, IMHO, I feel that it's appropriate in all forums and levels of Healthcare Education.

Specializes in ICU.

I agree with Betts - we could all revisit some of these exercises not because one person wants to be condescending or superior to another but to get insight from a variety of views. Like a lot others I clicked on had a quick read and thought - too busy I'll come back to this. I wish I had now tried earlier.

One of the reasons why this sort of question is difficult to answer and is easily answered wrongly is the "index of suspicion" that is absent when reading the question. When I recieve handover I usually formulate an "index of suspicion" as to who are my most unstable patients. Sometimes we cannot do this as we have not the expereince in this field to notice the "red flags" for what they are or the infromation is given in a way that diminishes the alarm bells. (did I just mix a metaphor there?)

For those who liked this exercise - why don't we set up a continuing thread in the "student nurse forum" for critical thinking exercises. We could do it so that there is no shame or blame in getting the answer "wrong" and indeed in some questions the "right" answer might be one of several "rights".

Please give feedback on this and your thoughts about how you would like them run

i.e. Initial scenario - posted day one

extra information - posted day two

more information - posted day three

final infromation - posted day four

feedback - posted day five

Just a thought

P.S. Remember - hindsight is 100% effective!!!

+ Add a Comment