Why I'm Not an Anti-Vaxer

Nurses COVID

Published

crof takes on the anti-vaccine crowd, and makes the case for why he is in favor of the swine flu vaccine. i agree with him.

i do understand that some people will choose not to be vaccinated. i can respect

that. what gets me upset though with some of the more vocal anti-vaxers is that misinformation

is being spread, sometimes in a quite deliberate attempt to mislead less informed readers. often

myths are being spread simply due to ignorance.

someone even claimed to be involved with sending a sample of the new vaccine

to a lab for analysis, and that it contained among other things, the adjuvant,

squalene. what was truly astounding about this was that it was written about a

week before the vaccine had even been released and could not possibly have been

true. the adjuvant, btw is not even licensed for use in the us.

two of the most frequent untruths being hinted at and even posted as fact is that squalene is secretly in the us swine flu vaccine, and that baxter labs, infamous for a contaminated flu vaccine incident in europe is one of the providers of the swine flu vaccine for the us. both myths are untrue, but you wouldn't know that if you were unfamiliar with information about the influenza vaccines, and many people are not.

http://crofsblogs.typepad.com/h5n1/2009/10/why-im-not-an-anti-vaxer.html

i have placed references to mike adams statements in red for easier reading.

thanks to the reader who sent the link to this item from natural news.com: swine flu vaccine victims encouraged to post reports of side effects on swinefluvaccinereport.com by mike adams the health ranger. it gives me a chance to explain why i'm such an old crab about these guys....

as the swine flu vaccination campaigns begin sweeping across america, naturalnews has created a new website where victims of swine flu vaccine side effects can post their true stories about what happened to them or their children.

"victims of swine flu side effects" and "post their true stories" are great examples of begging the question: assuming the truth of something still under debate.

the website is http://www.swinefluvaccinereport.com and it was created by naturalnews editor mike adams for the simple purpose of "shedding light" on the potential side effects of the swine flu vaccine.

"potential side effects" is meaningless. a potential side effect of shaving is cutting your own throat. so what?

anyone can post on the site. all posts are moderated, so it takes some time for new posts to be approved. any posts that appear to be fictitious will be deleted.

well, i delete some posts too, but not because they're fictitious. they're wrong and therefore just a waste of time.

"this website gives swine flu vaccine sufferers an opportunity to share their true stories with the world," said mike adams, also the writer of the popular hip-hop song 'don't inject me.'

"swine flu vaccine sufferers" = more begging the question. then a brilliant example of the appeal to authority: he's not only the editor of the site, he's a ... hip-hop writer. of a popular song.

"while vaccine manufacturers are trying to censor the truth about the dangers of their vaccines, we are working to serve the public interest by openly revealing the truth about how these vaccines are impacting real people."

more loaded language: "censor the truth," "dangers of their vaccines," "serve the public interest." how can we not trust this guy? adams is on the record saying that the swine flu vaccines are likely more dangerous than the swine flu itself.

so what? does this mean if you survive a vaccination he'll give you your money back?

the extremely mild nature of h1n1 influenza, combined with the increasing reports of seizures and deaths from cervical cancer vaccines, leads many people to be openly concerned about the risk / reward ratio of swine flu vaccination.

close to an outright lie from this promoter of truth. "increasing reports" = one case of a poor girl who died of a malignant tumor in her chest shortly after receiving an hpv vaccination she would never need. "many people" is just another example of the bandwagon propaganda device: if many people believe something, there must be something to it.

"there is no medically justifiable reason to be vaccinated against such a mild flu," says adams. "this vaccine is clearly being pushed solely as a revenue generator for the pharmaceutical companies, not as a serious effort to protect public health."

if i refused a vaccination, caught h1n1, and passed it along to a pregnant woman or an asthmatic child, i would have a hell of a lot on my conscience.

the vaccination isn't all about me, or about those wikkid big pharma corporations--it's about building a barrier to protect the people who really do get terribly sick from this "mild flu."

maybe mr. adams the hip-hop star ought to spend some time in icus, seeing what this mild virus can do.

and he then might try making his case in the unemotional, rational language of the medical profession, instead of resorting to semantic gimmicks and logical fallacies that aristotle would have laughed at.

i'm sorry if i've upset some of my regular visitors with this rant. i realize some people have genuine reasons for refusing a vaccination. but as the pandemic has gone on, the anti-vaxers have grown increasingly smug in their rejection of the medical science that has repeatedly saved their ignorant asses from death before the age of 5.

sixty-one years ago next month, i caught polio for the lack of a vaccine. i could have ended up in an iron lung, or lurching around with crutches and braces on my legs, like one of my classmates (who caught polio twice).

when the polio vaccine came along, you'd better believe i took it--and so did my father and brother, both of whom probably had undiagnosed polio about the time i did. so did millions of others, and now polio has effectively vanished from the civilized world, like smallpox.

regular readers of this blog know that i know how minor this pandemic is compared to the ongoing disasters of hiv/aids, tb, malaria, and a host of other diseases.

it's no credit to us that we ignore those deaths. if americans, for example, reported their own gunshot deaths (30,000 a year) as breathlessly as they're reporting their few deaths from swine flu, they might even be moved to do something about that particular public-health catastrophe.

if canadians had really cared about the dismal living conditions (and mortality rates) on our first nations reserves, we'd have forestalled last spring's outbreaks in manitoba.

but our culture shrugs off some deaths and pays attention to others. at the moment, h1n1 deaths are getting attention. most of those deaths are preventable, if we deal seriously with them, and in the process we might learn something that will save lives at risk from worse diseases.

and one thing that will save far, far more lives than it will cost is vaccination.

Specializes in Too many to list.

It was the first swine flu vaccine that became available as of last week. Many schools have been mailing home permission slips to parents to sign for this vaccine.

My own hospital is not offering it for our staff, however. We will have the injections instead, and probably multi dose vials.

You will have to check around for where this is available, but it is a good option for you.

It was the first swine flu vaccine that became available as of last week. Many schools have been mailing home permission

slips to parents to sign for this vaccine.

My own hospital is not offering it for our staff, however. We will have the injections instead, and probably multi dose vials.

You will have to check around for where this is available, but it is a good option for you.

Yeah I think my school clinic will be providing the shot for free. I may just settle for that.

Specializes in Acute Care Psych, DNP Student.

I had some moments of being "anti swine flu vax" when the vaccine was first coming out and there was confusion about the adjuvant thing. However, I do not believe there are any adjuvants in this vaccine. Think about it - would the CDC send out thousands of vials of vax with secret ingredients, knowing someone, somewhere, is going to be testing the contents? I think not.

What I have seen is deaths in my area and some severe illness. So no, I'm not anti-vax. I'm looking to get vaccinated as soon as I can.

Specializes in School Nursing.

I feel the same, Multicollinearity. I was very leery of the vac when they first started talking about it, and I think it was the term "fast track" that I feared. However, then I actually researched it and learned that it is made the same as the seasonal flu vac that millions take annually with few side effects.

With any treatment, there is a risk-benefit ratio, because almost nothing we do in medicine is completely benign. In this case, I believe the risks of the vac are miniscule compared to the benefit. I do not think this strain of the flu is going anywhere anytime soon, and the fact that it kills previously healthy people in a seemingly random manner scares me much more than a vaccine that is not "new" in any way other than the strain of flu that is being inserted.

Specializes in ER, Med/Surg.

Making us wear a mask, "This way, patients can be informed that the person taking care of them may potentially be contagious." is a bunch of nonsense. What may I be contagious with? The flu? Chickenpox? The common cold? Any of a thousand other viral syndromes? Maybe MRSA? It is said that most working in healthcare are colonised with MRSA anyway... Maybe everyone in healthcare should have to don a level A HazMat suit before entering any room? We can take this as far as you want.

Maybe we should start color coding our masks so our patients can know what disease I *MAY* have......

Take the shot or not, but don't try to force me to do the same.

+ Add a Comment