Published
This is a great example of the harm reduction model in action. I think it could be a good thing.
http://www.ihra.net/files/2010/05/31/HIVTop50Documents11.pdf
I am not against it, that's for sure. I don't really see the users using it on themselves, would they really recognize an overdose and be willing to kill the high?
On one hand, I'd want it available to use on my loved one. On the other hand, I would not have contact with heroin users... So, my having narcan would do no one any good.
I am not against it, that's for sure. I don't really see the users using it on themselves, would they really recognize an overdose and be willing to kill the high?On one hand, I'd want it available to use on my loved one. On the other hand, I would not have contact with heroin users... So, my having narcan would do no one any good.
Don't be so sure, unless you've actually been there. Addiction is a horrible disease and when your loved one actually is addicted to heroin and needs help its not as easy as "not having contact". Just saying.
I don't know about just handing narcan out to addicts, it sort of is like saying "here is a quick fix if you over-do it" but at the same time it would save lives, so I digress. Maybe something like a no-questions asked policy where they can call 911 and ask for it? I don't know, there would be problems with that, too.
New Mexico has done this for a while, though I don't know the outcome so far. This really won't help people who overdose on heroin or opioids (which are a big problem in Vermont) while alone.
More than half of all opiate overdoses are "witnessed", so it can benefit up to more than half of it's "target audience". In contrast, Statins may only benefit as little as 1-2% of people who take them (depending on what study you refer to).
Most addicts when receiving narcan are less than thrilled. And could require some immediate intervention not readily available at home. I wouldn't want to be the family member on the receiving end of that interaction. I am not sure how a family member or friend is going to protect themselves when a person who is addicted comes to, and is irate.
Addiction is a disease process, and not a character defect. Addicts are really unlikely to administer narcan to themselves. And if od'ing, not sure if they would have the capacity to do so anyways.
I can see a concerned family/friend doing this perhaps once, but depending on the reaction, I am not sure that they would be willing to do it again.
Mulan
2,228 Posts
http://caledonianrecord.com/main.asp?SectionID=180&SubSectionID=778&ArticleID=102655
[TABLE=width: 100%]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD=align: left] [TABLE=width: 100%]
[TR]
[TD=width: 33%, align: left][/TD]
[TD=width: 33%, align: center][/TD]
[TD=width: 33%, align: right][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD=colspan: 3]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[TABLE=width: 100%]
[TR]
[TD] [TABLE=width: 100%]
[TR]
[TD]11/16/2013 8:34:00 AM
Overdose Antidote Expected To Save Lives
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][TABLE]
[TR]
[TD][TABLE=width: 290]
[TR]
[TD=width: 290, align: left] [TABLE=width: 100%]
[TR]
[TD]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR=bgcolor: #bdbdbd]
[TD] + click to enlarge
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
"Wayne Bassett, a Vietnam War veteran, unintentionally injected himself with a lethal dose of heroin in 2001 at his Danville home and died alone, excepting the family dogs.
His wife Nancy Bassett, a heroin addict herself, was in Connecticut serving nine months in rehab at the Federal Correctional Facility in Danbury. Her crime: transporting narcotics across state lines, a federal offense."
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
"She recounted the experience this week from her tiny office at the recovery center upon news that Narcan, an overdose antidote long administered by doctors and EMTs, is going mainstream. A new state of Vermont pilot program aims to distribute Narcan to addicts, their friends and family."