I came across this is little story today, it's not breaking news. I suspect that a member of the housekeeping staff knows something about the bomb threat that required the sweep for weapons.
According to police in Secaucus, the bomb threat — which later was determined to be bogus — was called in to Hudson Regional Hospital on July 18. During a search, bomb detection dogs led investigators to an unlocked office closet containing dozens of firearms.
Among the weapons were 11 handguns and 27 rifles or shotguns, according to police. The closet also contained a .45 caliber semi-automatic rifle with a high-capacity magazine that was determined to be an assault rifle, and a 14-round high-capacity handgun magazine.
The arrested the guy the next day.
What the heck do you think this guy was doing? It sounds very ominous that he was keeping those weapons there.
You seem to have trouble comprehending my words and so you think that you should lecture me about the individual and group "right" to be ignorant or believe nonsense. Interesting. When did I say we should start punishing people for their speech? Or are you talking about legal limits on speech that might lead to consequences?
When and where did I say that the first amendment only applies to some? Are you just being dishonest or do you think that such hyperbolic claims are useful tools in a discussion? Then you go on to project some re-education nonsense on me.
Am I (or anyone really) supposed to take you seriously when you try to engage like that?
You seem more impatient than anyone else in these threads about that slow DOJ process. Holding wealthy and powerful people accountable seems to be harder for the DOJ than holding average citizens accountable.
You asked me, where I learned people have the right to believe in BS and lies or whatever. I said when I understood I live in a free country.
Well. The way you talk and the democrats talk it's an obvious clear cut case. With specialized investigations a comittiees to boot. So it shouldn't take so long for charges. You are convinced of his guilt without trial.
Yes. I'm tried of hearing that Trump will be charged for sure this time..... He's guilty of this and that! But still no charges. It's either a political stunt or a failed investigation at this point. So go take care of the country, there are people suffering.
Well you can take me as seriously as you want. Free country. I just hope you take me more seriously than theses supposed crimes Trumpnhas committed. The DOH doesn't seem to. Actually I don't care if you take me seriously or not.
If you want to talk about some corruption from a Democrat in the news bring it to the thread. But like I said, the current news about Trump era Republicans takes up lots of space. It's difficult to get more interesting than trying to overthrow the US government and hush money payments to Media stars by the leader of the party of patriots and family values. IMV
You are correct. From what I watched and observed and heard myself, I believe that Trump is responsible for inciting the mob on January 6th. Having witnessed and observed Trump's political behavior for 5 years prior to January 6th I think that incitement is in his wheelhouse, so to speak. I believe that he is guilty of intentionally taking and then keeping government documents, some highly classified. He essentially said that it was intentional when he said they were his. Yes I believe that Trump broke laws when he tried to pressure the Georgia secretary of state to find him enough votes to win the state.
Not guilty is not synonymous with innocent.
No one said that Trump's narcissistic pathology is illegal... your attempts at hyperbole are failing. Please stop.
This last part;
Or play games, weaponize institutions and set status quo for every presidential elections. Where opponents create endless investigations and impeachment are a monthy occurrence.
That reads like you are discussing McCarthy's House. They literally spent hours talking about Twitter temporarily blocking access to a photo of a member. For real. And have you heard how Republicans across the country have changed election laws because of the imagined election security problems? 19 states increased restrictions, right? Is that the setting of status quo that you are referencing?
Why are the democrats so interested in a member pic? LOL.
McCarthy has a duty to ensure our justice departments are not political and corrupt. He's doing his job.
If there are election security issues then they should be corrected. All elections have areas of weakness. Why not make them more secure? More secure elections. What's wrong with that?
Exactly. No guilty is not, innocent. So what is the point? I think you know.
If you want to talk about some corruption from a Democrat in the news bring it to the thread. But like I said, the current news about Trump era Republicans takes up lots of space. It's difficult to get more interesting than trying to overthrow the US government and hush money payments to Media stars by the leader of the party of patriots and family values. IMV
You are correct. From what I watched and observed and heard myself, I believe that Trump is responsible for inciting the mob on January 6th. Having witnessed and observed Trump's political behavior for 5 years prior to January 6th I think that incitement is in his wheelhouse, so to speak. I believe that he is guilty of intentionally taking and then keeping government documents, some highly classified. He essentially said that it was intentional when he said they were his. Yes I believe that Trump broke laws when he tried to pressure the Georgia secretary of state to find him enough votes to win the state.
Not guilty is not synonymous with innocent.
No one said that Trump's narcissistic pathology is illegal... your attempts at hyperbole are failing. Please stop.
This last part;
Or play games, weaponize institutions and set status quo for every presidential elections. Where opponents create endless investigations and impeachment are a monthy occurrence.
That reads like you are discussing McCarthy's House. They literally spent hours talking about Twitter temporarily blocking access to a photo of a member. For real. And have you heard how Republicans across the country have changed election laws because of the imagined election security problems? 19 states increased restrictions, right? Is that the setting of status quo that you are referencing?
Exactly. Not guilty does not mean innocent. It is very convenient to make allegations with no trial. Where the dominate party screams guilt from the roof tops but the people do not get to hear all the evidence.
I think we found the reason for no charges. Seems to be a conundrum.
Charge, have a trial, American people can see the evidence. Don't charge, no trial, people may believe there is no crime. What web the dems have woven for themselves.....
MaybeeRN said:
The leader of the House Democrats is an election denier. The January 6th hearing was a Hollywood production with heavily edited videos. How many times did Schiff for brains say he had a smoking. Gun but failed to deliver any of it? They can refer all they want but the DOJ said thanks but no thanks to that waste of time.
Oh no. The "troll" has facts!! TMB is getting itchy.
In your opinion. We all know that you didn't watch the hearings and depended upon Fox and right wing media outlets for your information about the topic and that is reflected in your opinion. You are a example of exactly why McCarthy gave the security footage to a propagandist...the gullible and agitated fans demand more spin and animus... not truth or facts.
Your fantasy that the DOJ said "thanks but no thanks" is easily debunked by the fact that Jack Smith was put in charge of the Trump investigation. That's literally an acceptance of the case. LOL
It's a shame that you have no other options but to use fabrication, fantastical thinking and BS in defense of Trump behavior. Having a discussion is difficult, isn't it?
I watched it. All of it. Did you watch it on CNN?
It was produced by Hollywood producers! Complete with closed captioning of Cheney's face. All sincere and empathetic. Total theater.
Exactly. Not guilty does not mean innocent. It is very convenient to make allegations with no trial. Where the dominate party screams guilt from the roof tops but the people do not get to hear all the evidence.
I think we found the reason for no charges. Seems to be a conundrum.
Charge, have a trial, American people can see the evidence. Don't charge, no trial, people may believe there is no crime. What web the dems have woven for themselves.....
Oh no. The "troll" has facts!! TMB is getting itchy.
TMB ignores facts when you post them. Just another left wing gaslighter that supports the party of Jim Crow and Bull Conner.
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
MaybeeRN said:
Ahhhh the liberal echo chamber. Your leader was an election denier but doesn't fit the liberal narrative. So it must be right wing talking points. Jan 6th hearings that relied on a Hollywood consultant and heavily edited videos. Another CNN fan boy.
LOL
But you only know what right wing pundits told you about the January 6th hearings. You told us that you weren't going to watch and then, later, told us that you didn't watch them. An opinion based upon the commentary and rhetoric of right wing media hosts is not that compelling outside of that right wing echo chamber.
But you only know what right wing pundits told you about the January 6th hearings. You told us that you weren't going to watch and then, later, told us that you didn't watch them. An opinion based upon the commentary and rhetoric of right wing media hosts is not that compelling outside of that right wing echo chamber.
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
Roitrn said:
You were the person who mentioned Bengazi, I'm pretty sure you are not republican...
Again with the poor reading comprehension issue. Why don't you go back and reread what I said about conservatives mentioning Clinton corruption and liberals debunking that with the corrupt Republican weaponization of congress to damage her candidacywith 2 years of "investigation". Until you can actually comprehend my statements it's a waste of time trying to communicate further with you.
You started right out with BS...I didn't even bother to read the rest of the comment.
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
Roitrn said:
Why are the democrats so interested in a member pic? LOL.
McCarthy has a duty to ensure our justice departments are not political and corrupt. He's doing his job.
If there are election security issues then they should be corrected. All elections have areas of weakness. Why not make them more secure? More secure elections. What's wrong with that?
Exactly. No guilty is not, innocent. So what is the point? I think you know.
Reread what I said about the member pics... read for comprehension.
The 2020 election was free and fair and the most secure in history, according to security experts. That's an odd fact to spur Republicans to rush to put more restrictions on voting.
Again with the poor reading comprehension issue. Why don't you go back and reread what I said about conservatives mentioning Clinton corruption and liberals debunking that with the corrupt Republican weaponization of congress to damage her candidacywith 2 years of "investigation". Until you can actually comprehend my statements it's a waste of time trying to communicate further with you.
You started right out with BS...I didn't even bother to read the rest of the comment.
Liberals debunking? Theres that gaslighting again. Because you wish things to be so doesn't make them so. Like a typical Liberal you accuse Republicans of the very thing liberals do. You have no proof just portly written opinion pieces from left wing rags that wouldn't even be useful in an outhouse. You get your news from CNN and MSNBC which is why you have no clue about what really goes on. That's why you and nursej22 didn't know about Eric Holder claiming to be Obama's wingman.
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
Roitrn said:
Exactly. Not guilty does not mean innocent. It is very convenient to make allegations with no trial. Where the dominate party screams guilt from the roof tops but the people do not get to hear all the evidence.
I think we found the reason for no charges. Seems to be a conundrum.
Charge, have a trial, American people can see the evidence. Don't charge, no trial, people may believe there is no crime. What web the dems have woven for themselves.....
Oh no. The "troll" has facts!! TMB is getting itchy.
Everyone expects at least one trial in the 4 criminal investigations into Trump... well most people anyway. It's too bad that you weren't around to correct the LOCK HER UP crowd about rushing to judgement without evidence and it's curious that you haven't spoken out about the right wing allegations about that Hunter Biden laptop and the conspiracy that it somehow implicates President Biden. I mean that's a great example of a political party screaming guilt from the rooftops while they weaponize government to further that political agenda... because they have power in the House.
What is the reason for no charges? Is it because Trump is shielded from charges by his candidacy, status or wealth?
Or, could it because the prosecutors understand that their investigation MUST be complete befits they make the unprecedented move to indict a former president for crimes. They understand the historical and legal significance of this even if some of the public do not.
The only web of deceit involved in these cases is the one woven by the twice impeached former president himself. That was a sad attempt to project Trump's spinning if the truth into others.
Reread what I said about the member pics... read for comprehension.
The 2020 election was free and fair and the most secure in history, according to security experts. That's an odd fact to spur Republicans to rush to put more restrictions on voting.
If you have to assert that, then there's a problem. When has any election with the need to proclaim how secure it was, the most secure in history? LOL.
I didn't say it wasn't a secure election. I said that some Republicans are trying to make future elections more secure. What's wrong with that? A secure election is a good thing right? So what's the problem?
And what's the problem with McCarthy ensuring that the justice departments are non political and not corrupt? That's what we need right?
Unless there is something to be worried about, then the inquiry into the justice departments should be welcome by both parties. Ensuring our elections are secure should be as well.
Roitrn
618 Posts
You asked me, where I learned people have the right to believe in BS and lies or whatever. I said when I understood I live in a free country.
Well. The way you talk and the democrats talk it's an obvious clear cut case. With specialized investigations a comittiees to boot. So it shouldn't take so long for charges. You are convinced of his guilt without trial.
Yes. I'm tried of hearing that Trump will be charged for sure this time..... He's guilty of this and that! But still no charges. It's either a political stunt or a failed investigation at this point. So go take care of the country, there are people suffering.
Well you can take me as seriously as you want. Free country. I just hope you take me more seriously than theses supposed crimes Trumpnhas committed. The DOH doesn't seem to. Actually I don't care if you take me seriously or not.