Published
I don't think it matters, probably just a matter of preference.
Then I guess I'd have to ask what the differences are between MICU and SICU.
I know that SICU is high-acuity post-surgical patients. And that a lot of SICU nurses are looking to become CRNAs.
I know that the MICU has a broader mix of patients, some surgical and some medical, kind of like med-surg.
Not looking to become a CRNA, but a narrower range of conditions might be helpful. It's harder to master something when you're dealing with a wider range of stuff.
just to add to the previous post:
I also work in a med-surg ICU . . . and our surgical patients are usually pretty straight forward: pain control, continuous assessments for bleeding, infection, dehiscence, mobilize soon after surgery, monitor renal and respiratory status . . . in most cases, transfer out in 1 or 2 days
Medical patients are a total mixed bag: previous surgical patients who bled or got septic, COPD'ers or asthmatics in resp failure, GI bleeders, crazy people, drug OD, failure to thrive, you name it . . . many of these patients end up intubated, trached, on dialysis, long time in ICU . . .
Many of you seem to favor SICU over MICU because of the higher turnover. I can see how that might be good.
But on my present floor we have high turnover, and it really isn't that good. While it's great to get rid of a troublesome patient, it means a near-constant stream of admissions, which ends up disrupting your day.
Joe NightingMale, MSN, RN
1,716 Posts
I've been working in a busy med-surg for 6 months post-graduation, plan to work there another 6-12 months.
After that I'm changing hospitals (this one is an inner-city charity hospital) and changing specialization.
Given my med-surg experience, would MICU be a better fit than SICU? Or does it matter?