Published Mar 17, 2008
BrokenRNheart
367 Posts
what is rn staffing like
where you work?
as part of the newly launched safe staffing campaign, uan is collecting feedback from staff nurses on what staffing levels are like in their facilities. we'll share the responses with the public, elected leaders, the media and you.
please take a minute to complete the short survey below and return it to uan.
http://www.uannurse.org/survey/
"While other public service industries--airlines, for example--are regulated by the government to ensure that there is adequate staffing for safe operations, most hospitals aren't subject to any minimum nurse staffing laws or regulatory standards.
But nurses are making their voices heard in the halls of Congress and in statehouses across the country to make minimum nurse-patient ratios the law of the land--and conditions are slowly changing as awareness grows.":yeah:
bollweevil
386 Posts
You will probably get more responses if people can reply anonymously.
This is not mine. I will come up with one that is anonymous. Give me time. That's how they shut us up. Make us afraid to speak up.
I found this and decided to post it for anyone interested. I'm afraid that there will be too little action because too many of us feel hopeless. So, I will continue to try to find the easy steps.
oramar
5,758 Posts
I can't respond. I am no longer employed at bedside. Wish you would have asked me a year ago.
imanedrn
547 Posts
"While other public service industries--airlines, for example--are regulated by the government to ensure that there is adequate staffing for safe operations, most hospitals aren't subject to any minimum nurse staffing laws or regulatory standards. But nurses are making their voices heard in the halls of Congress and in statehouses across the country to make minimum nurse-patient ratios the law of the land--and conditions are slowly changing as awareness grows."
But nurses are making their voices heard in the halls of Congress and in statehouses across the country to make minimum nurse-patient ratios the law of the land--and conditions are slowly changing as awareness grows."
My dad's a commercial airline pilot and reminds me of this frequently when we discuss our respective careers. They also have a MAXIMUM number of hours they can fly per month! This even includes time they spend waiting in the aircraft, doing nothing!
It's great that there are regulations to prevent the loss of 100-200+ lives once in a blue moon, but sad that very little is done when the loss of lives is scattered - as in healthcare.
grace90, LPN, LVN
763 Posts
When will administrators stop worshipping the almighty dollar and when will nurse managers stop reveling in the ability to throw their own around?
forrester
197 Posts
Curious that the UAN is just now getting around to caring about staffing ratios. Or is this a yearly survey?
Wonder what prompted this global concern?
Julia RN
111 Posts
You can reply annonymously by using the pdf link on the survey page. Just print it and mail or fax it to the UAN. Your zipcode is the only personal information that is requested on the form.
Curious that the UAN is just now getting around to caring about staffing ratios. Or is this a yearly survey?Wonder what prompted this global concern?
The UAN has been caring about staffing ratios (and more) since its inception.
At its first National Labor Assembly meeting in 2000, UAN delegates launched a year-long public awareness campaign on the nurse staffing crisis and expanded the campaign in 2001.
http://www.uannurse.org/who/resolution/2000/20.html
http://www.uannurse.org/who/resolution/2001/11.html
The legislative platform adopted at the first (2000) meeting included:
-Revision of Health Care Financing Agency (HCFA) Conditions of Participation to Include Safe Staffing Requirements
-Initiatives to Ensure Universal Health Care Coverage
-Education and Mobilization of Nurses Regarding Single Payer
In 2002, the UAN delivered testimony to the IOM on patient safety and the work environment of RNs which included staffing ratios.
http://www.uannurse.org/media/press.html?view=press_release&press_id=70&year=2002
From UAN president, Cheryl Johnson's 2003 press release concerning the IOM Report:
Johnson specifically highlighted the report's emphasis on safe staffing: "We know from our own polling and research at UAN that staff nurses place a top priority on having a safe, minimum nurse-to-patient staffing ratio in delivering quality care...Johnson added that a federally mandated nurse-to-patient ratio will serve to set a nationwide, minimum staffing standard to ensure patients receive adequate care.
The latest survey coincided with the re-introduction of national nurse staffing ratio legislation which is supported by the UAN (as well as other national unions and nursing organizations). The bill is H.R. 2123, Nurse Staffing Standards for Patient Safety and Quality Care Act of 2007. It currently has 48 co-sponsors. http://www.uannurse.org/legislative/bill.html
I've posted information about this legislation, and the UAN's support of it, in various threads on this forum and have also asked why CNA is not supporting this legislation, but have not received any response. Isn't CNA supposed to part of the AFL's "RNs Working Together" Industrial Coordinating Committee? Its members should know about this legislation if they are a part of that.
Elsewhere on this board, CNA has claimed to be the only organizaton, other than Massachusetts, to be working on state staffing ratio legislation. This is not true but seems to be a useful organizing tool for CNA. I'm all for organizing more nurses into unions, and applaud CNA as a leader in the staffing ratio arena. But it seems if it's not CNA's baby, it's not worth their attention here. If CNA could put aside it's own need to be number one for a legislative session or two, maybe we could see some real progress for staff nurses.
How about it?? Can we use this board to really get 'RNs working together' on national nursing issues like staffing ratios, mandatory overtime, the RESPECT act, as well as single payer??
The UAN has been caring about staffing ratios (and more) since its inception. At its first National Labor Assembly meeting in 2000, UAN delegates launched a year-long public awareness campaign on the nurse staffing crisis and expanded the campaign in 2001.http://www.uannurse.org/who/resolution/2000/20.html http://www.uannurse.org/who/resolution/2001/11.htmlThe legislative platform adopted at the first (2000) meeting included:-Revision of Health Care Financing Agency (HCFA) Conditions of Participation to Include Safe Staffing Requirements-Initiatives to Ensure Universal Health Care Coverage -Education and Mobilization of Nurses Regarding Single Payer In 2002, the UAN delivered testimony to the IOM on patient safety and the work environment of RNs which included staffing ratios.http://www.uannurse.org/media/press.html?view=press_release&press_id=70&year=2002From UAN president, Cheryl Johnson's 2003 press release concerning the IOM Report:Johnson specifically highlighted the report's emphasis on safe staffing: "We know from our own polling and research at UAN that staff nurses place a top priority on having a safe, minimum nurse-to-patient staffing ratio in delivering quality care...Johnson added that a federally mandated nurse-to-patient ratio will serve to set a nationwide, minimum staffing standard to ensure patients receive adequate care.The latest survey coincided with the re-introduction of national nurse staffing ratio legislation which is supported by the UAN (as well as other national unions and nursing organizations). The bill is H.R. 2123, Nurse Staffing Standards for Patient Safety and Quality Care Act of 2007. It currently has 48 co-sponsors. http://www.uannurse.org/legislative/bill.htmlI've posted information about this legislation, and the UAN's support of it, in various threads on this forum and have also asked why CNA is not supporting this legislation, but have not received any response. Isn't CNA supposed to part of the AFL's "RNs Working Together" Industrial Coordinating Committee? Its members should know about this legislation if they are a part of that. Elsewhere on this board, CNA has claimed to be the only organizaton, other than Massachusetts, to be working on state staffing ratio legislation. This is not true but seems to be a useful organizing tool for CNA. I'm all for organizing more nurses into unions, and applaud CNA as a leader in the staffing ratio arena. But it seems if it's not CNA's baby, it's not worth their attention here. If CNA could put aside it's own need to be number one for a legislative session or two, maybe we could see some real progress for staff nurses.How about it?? Can we use this board to really get 'RNs working together' on national nursing issues like staffing ratios, mandatory overtime, the RESPECT act, as well as single payer??
I am not an active member of the CNA/NNOC, though I paid the money to support them. At 85,000, they already have passed the UAN with their 50,000 members in 20 states.
The terminology used by the UAN is the same terminology used by the ANA. It is TOO VAGUE and allows nurse executives and their masters to do what they want and call it safe staffing.
Geez, how many years of nursing surveys do they need before they get it??? I know I've done at least 20:bluecry1:
We need to get specific with these laws and stop giving them the wriggle room to continue this abuse.
H.R. 2123 is nothing like the ANA bill. The only "wiggle room" is to provide more nurses than specified in the minimum ratios.
The UAN supported bill would require hospitals to implement staffing plans that meet specified ratios for direct care registered nurse-to-patient staffing levels for each unit and other requirements, including for receiving input from nurses.
Minimum direct care registered nurse-to-patient ratios: A hospital would be required during each shift, except during a declared emergency, to assign a direct care registered nurse to no more than the following number of patients in designated units:
Two years after passage-and four years for rural hospitals-hospitals would be expected to develop and implement nurse staffing plans that meet newly-established minimum direct care registered nurse-to-patient ratios, adjust staffing levels based on acuity of patients and other factors, and ensure quality care and patient safety.
In addition the bill provides for:
- PROTECTION OF NURSES AND OTHER INDIVIDUALS.
(a) Refusal of Assignment- A nurse may refuse to accept an assignment as a nurse in a hospital if--
(1) the assignment would violate section 3001 or 3003; or
(2) the nurse is not prepared by education, training, or experience to fulfill the assignment without compromising the safety of any patient or jeopardizing the license of the nurse.
Retaliation for refusal of assignment or reporting institutions for non-compliance is barred.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-2123
BTW- CNA includes members it does not actually represent for collective bargaining in its numbers- the UAN does not. CNA has only surpassed UAN in membership as a result of the very recent disaffiliation of several state nurses associations. All but one of the states that disaffiliated did not support minimum staffing ratio legislation and went for the hospital asscociation sponsored type of bill.