Published
The reason why nursing school is tuff because the directors want the students to pass NCLEX..They make the course work hard so that they will know only bright students will pass NCLEX...If the school gets under a 75% pass rate on NCLEX, the school will be put on probation...
I over heard this while the directer was talking to an instructor..
The 2011 validity assessment: https://www.ncsbn.org/12_RN_Practice_Analysis_Vol53.pdf
I am not saying I like the NCLEX, quite the opposite. Just saying it measures competency and doesn't necessarily correlate with breadth of knowledge, practical aptitude, academic merit, etc.
I read the summary of the article you quoted earler. It looks like the tome is a study of whether what's asked on the NCLEX correlates with nursing reality. Fair enough, and thanks for the info, but I think that's a bit different than what I was asking. Where'd you get this, and do you have any ideas on how an unannointed one could find evidence that the NCLEX tests what its supposed to test?
And if NCLEX doesn't test breadth of knowledge, practical aptitude, or academic merit, it wouldn't seem that there is much measureable substance to the minimal competency the exam supposedly measures. Presumably there's a list of minimmally competent behaviors somewhere, and the test could be evaluated against that, maybe. Seems to me like that list - the list of minimally competent behaviors - should be alot more readily available than it is.
I read the summary of the article you quoted earler. It looks like the tome is a study of whether what's asked on the NCLEX correlates with nursing reality. Fair enough, and thanks for the info, but I think that's a bit different than what I was asking. Where'd you get this, and do you have any ideas on how an unannointed one could find evidence that the NCLEX tests what its supposed to test?
And if NCLEX doesn't test breadth of knowledge, practical aptitude, or academic merit, it wouldn't seem that there is much measureable substance to the minimal competency the exam supposedly measures. Presumably there's a list of minimmally competent behaviors somewhere, and the test could be evaluated against that, maybe. Seems to me like that list - the list of minimally competent behaviors - should be alot more readily available than it is.
The study simply evaluates the NCLEX validity (does it measure what is says it measures - competency in practice) in my reading of it anyway. The study, as well as past years, is available from the NCSBN.
https://www.ncsbn.org/2010_NCLEX_RN_Detailed_Test_Plan_Candidate.pdf
See page 9-10. These are the "core" testing areas.
"very interesting story. i'm just curious about how the conversation went when you told her you could find no evidence that the process was unfair and that she really didn't have what it takes to pass nclex."
i wrote a very detailed report. i didn't tell her i didn't think she could pass nclex but i did tell the lawyer. well, let's just say my invoice hasn't been paid yet.
Horseshoe, BSN, RN
5,879 Posts
very interesting story. i'm just curious about how the conversation went when you told her you could find no evidence that the process was unfair and that she really didn't have what it takes to pass nclex.