"The Many Sides of a Nursing Shortage"

Nurses Activism

Published

[ Fair Use: For Educational / Research / Discussion Purposes Only ]

http://www.tcpalm.com/tcp/business/article/0,1651,TCP_998_1105258,00.html

April 23, 2002, by Ryan Alessi

The many sides of a nursing shortage

Amid the beeps and blips of medical machines, Kara Coullard calmly takes a needle and injects it into her elderly patient's vein. The fluid is supposed to rush through the woman's bloodstream to trace how swiftly her struggling heart is pumping.

The patient just had her chest opened for double-bypass surgery. A team of doctors had delivered her to Coullard in the George Washington University Hospital's intensive-care unit only a few hours before.

It was just the second heart patient Coullard had worked on, even though she has been in the intensive-care unit since she graduated from nursing school two years ago.

"I was very nervous," Coullard said, glancing over at the monitor of numbers and zigzagging vital signs. "I said, 'Oh no, I don't know if I can take it.' The doctors said, 'Oh, we'll be right there to get you started. You'll do fine.' "

Then they left the woman's life in Coullard's hands.

It's routine that once a procedure is finished, doctors rush off to the next. Their time is spread thin. It's the nurses who hold patients' hands, keep an eye on all those vital signs and rush to bedsides for special needs.

But the nation's aging nursing corps has faced its own needs in the last decade. Hospitals have been bound more closely to their bottom lines, largely because of managed-care organizations. And nursing schools haven't been churning out enough new nurses to replenish the work force.

As a result, some health officials fear that the decline in nurses over the last few years is only the beginning of what could be a 20-year shortage.

"We've had shortages before," says Rep. Lois Capps, a California Democrat who is a registered nurse. "But we could see the signs a few years ago that it was not a quick downturn - not part of a cycle. And it's becoming critical for many hospitals across the country."

Last summer, the American Hospital Association estimated that U.S. hospitals have a combined 126,000 nursing vacancies. Three out of every four open positions at a hospital is in nursing.

In addition, the average age of nurses has risen steadily over the last 15 years to more than 43 years old, meaning a higher percentage of nurses will begin retiring over the next decade. At the same time, the U.S. Department of Labor predicted in November that demand for nurses will rise 21 percent between 1998 and 2008, in large part because of the aging population's need for health care.

To stem the nationwide shortage, the government, a few schools and some health-care companies have begun campaigns to drum up more interest for the profession and offer incentives for people of all backgrounds to don scrubs.

Capps, who was a school nurse for 20 years before coming to Washington, is pushing Congress to pass her bill, which would provide federal funds to pay for nursing scholarships, training of more nursing instructors, public service announcements for the profession and programs in schools to nudge young students toward nursing.

Different versions of the bill, which was introduced last April, have passed in the House and Senate. Now a team of legislators is wrangling over which parts will become law. Among the biggest questions: whether to provide money for nursing faculty development, whether to pay other stipends for nursing students and whether to fund residencies for specialized nurses.

Corporate giant Johnson & Johnson sponsored television ads featuring nurses from around the country collectively explaining why they do what they do. The ads began airing in February. The company also hosts a Web site, http://www.discovernursing.com, which includes a database of grants and scholarships for prospective nursing students, as well as a listing of nursing programs across the country.

"That's a start," said company spokesman John McKeegan. "But the shortage of nursing (instructors) is just as severe."

It is one of many threads that has been unraveling from the tapestry of America's nursing corps.

Because nursing classes must be kept small - one instructor per 15 students at most - schools must hire more faculty members before admitting more students. As a result, many nursing programs have waiting lists one or two years deep.

On the other end of the spectrum, some nursing schools can't find enough students. Overall, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing reports enrollment in entry-level nursing programs dropped from 127,683 in 1995 to 106,557 last year.

Sue Dachenhaus, an administrator at San Marcos High School in Santa Barbara, Calif., knew nurses were in high demand. All she had to do was go down the street to Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital to see that.

In May 2000, she and other teachers from San Marcos trekked to Bakersfield to visit a health academy for high school students, which sits across the street from a Kaiser Permanente facility. "We decided we could do something like that in our school," Dachenhaus said.

Last fall, 10th- through 12th-graders became the first San Marcos students to parti

[ the text on our screen at this site gets chopped off here ]

Contact Ryan Alessi at AlessiR (at)

shns.com

or online at

http://www.shns.com

-----------------------------------------

Exactly the reason that nurses are protesting the reliance on this kind of short-staffing-to-save-a buck nursing care delivery. Working in an unfamiliar environment & with an unmanageable pt load sets us up for mistakes. Thats why nurses are protesting this all over the country. The flawed system and administrators who perpetuate it are more at fault than the nurse who is forced to work in it. Recently a court decision absolved the nurses of blame for a case of poor pt care & held the hospital responsible for its short staffing practices which led to the incident. The hospital was sued - the nurses were cleared.

Before jumping to call the nurse a nitwit or claiming she was negligent, Id ask how many pts she had, what was her experience level, was she ever even oriented to the unit she was floated to, to the type of pts it cares for, to its paperwork and routine, how many hours she was working, and what was the staffing & acuity of the unit like that day? The answers may show that, like in this recent court case, it was the hospital that was negligent - to both the pts & the nurses - leaving them at risk for mistakes to happen.

ps

recently in NYC, a pt died after donating part of his liver. The state shut down the program citing "poor staffing practices". A first year intern with 12 days experience on the unit had been left to medically care for 34 transplant pts as the only MD there. There were nurses there also - 1 for every 7 of these pts when in similar units at other hospitals in this state the ratio for these pts is 1:1. At this hospital, not only was the RN to PT ratio too much, all of them were new nurses too. The state did not cite the nurses for negligence. It blamed the hospital for its staffing practices which put the pts, the nurses & the intern in a situation where mistakes were bound to happen.

Thanks -jt, that is the best summary of that incident I have read, I finally got it straight in my head. I have been reading bits and pieces of that situation and could not quite put it all together.

My pleasure - but that story doesnt end there....

for its "poor staffing" which the state said led to "abysmal third world aftercare", the hospital was fined the max - $48,000 - (thats less than the starting salary of a new grad ADN) - At this very same time, instead of recruiting to provide better pt ratios or improve pt care staffing, the hospital LAID OFF 450 hospital support services workers and ELIMINATED many vacant RN positions. The hospital response to the state regarding improving staffing is that they will no longer allow 1st yr interns to be left on their own & are hiring more PAs.

Go figure.

I work on a understaffed tele floor with transplants and radical necks to boot. Plain tylenol for immediate post op pain as ridiculous doesn't require much thinking, I'm sorry. Just my very humble opinion.

That nurse was FLOATED into that unit. The stress alone can impair her thinking. Thats why floating is restricted in our contracts. Its not a safe staffing tool.

Who knows if she was ever on that unit before, had any kind of orientation, how many pts she was trying to care for, if she even had any help, what kind of stress level she was under or what else was going on.

Who knows what any of us may miss while working in the same situation when ordinarily it would be something we wouldnt even have had to think about. But float to an unfamiliar area or try to work with unmanageable pt loads & under those kinds of conditions, the nurse is trying to think of a million things at once, is stressed & worried about making mistakes, and sometimes so overwhlemed that she cant think of or notice even the "simplest" of things. Thats why these staffing practices are being so hotly protested by nurses all over the country. Being overwhlemed does something to the brain & leaves us vulnerable to make mistakes we otherwise would not be making.

Its so disheartening to see how nurses are so ready to pass judgement & lynch each other even while knowing what they are all going thru daily right now in hospitals & nursing homes. Far be it for any of us to judge another nurses thinking ability without knowing what else she was facing in the situation she was forced into. We ourselves may someday be in the same kind of situation, may make a "stupid" mistake because of it, and may be needing support from our peers too.

Exactly Jt. Thanks for being supportive of nurses and working to better the working conditions for all nurses.

your welcome.

We are in a profession where we are accustomed to assess & evaluate by asking a lot of questions before we draw conclusions for a diagnosis - we should do more of that when it comes to drawing conclusions about our peers.

+ Add a Comment