Published
Wow. No one has started such a thread yet?
After promising that most K-8 students would be in schools in the first 100 days, apparently Joe is afraid to lead on this and has drastically scaled back that goal.
Instead, we're shooting for about half to go to school at least one day a week, by the end of April.
22 hours ago, heron said:You’re jumping the shark, here, kiddo. For one thing, railing against what you claim I think is a pretty feeble straw man.
For another, every time your mischaracterizationns are challenged, you present your (completely theoretical) credentials as a “POC” to refute those criticisms. This is supposed to silence any observation of the wrong-headedness and illogic if your various rants. Spamming the thread with right wingnut cliches does not obscure the fact that you don’t have a clue. Attempting to pass yourself off as a Candace Owens clone just makes you look as ridiculous as she is.
Really? So a white man knows more about my experience than you do? Or all POC? Now you sound like the "right wing" by your own definition and words. You are as redicoulas as your made up boogie man white supremacists hysteria.
I'm sorry you cannot handle diverse opinions or maybe even races, very non "liberal" of you!! As you see it as "spamming.
23 hours ago, MunoRN said:Yes, it's a way of saying that without actually saying it, but still gets across the bias you're trying to communicate. At this point it seems safe to assume you don't have another explanation for what you meant.
So you make assumptions? Perhaps you should be more concerned about the white skin color I mentioned and not the hair color.
7 hours ago, heron said:Project, much? You’re the one who keeps bringing up your ethnicity in answer to any criticism or disagreement. So, apparently we are to judge your claims based on the color of your skin (hair?) and not the content of your arguments. And I’m the racist? Hilarious!
Diluted Democrats, huh? Quite the Freudian slip there. Uncle Tucker would be proud …
I brought it up because I was assumed white and a nazi supremacists . I did not use it to validate my opinion.
It's interesting coming from a person who is most likely a liberal Democrat, the party that is obsessed with race and identity politics. Screaming racism for everything or whatever "phobic" of the day or hour.
31 minutes ago, Cclm said:No. He was referring to allowing many illegal, the operative word is ILLEGAL immigrants into the country to harvest votes. This is why voter id laws are being so contested. It allows non actual citizens to vote which is not democracy. It's like stacking the deck. Illegal immigrants could vote if no voter ideas are in place. So let in many, put them in swing states then get more democrat votes. It's simple and evil. And not democracy. The liberals either know this or willfully ignore it. It really has nothing to do with skin color. It would be the same if the majority of illegal immigrants were white. They are not.
Nonsense and garbage without any evidence to back up the claims.
18 minutes ago, Cclm said:
I really love how all the things I said, you are stuck on my sarcastic comment about hair color! Diversion much?
You still haven't mastered the skill of quoting and keeping your comments separate from one another but have apparently perfected the skill of misrepresentation...no one implied that POC cannot or should not think for themselves.
Hair color was important enough for you to bring it up.
8 minutes ago, Cclm said:I brought it up because I was assumed white and a nazi supremacists . I did not use it to validate my opinion.
It's interesting coming from a person who is most likely a liberal Democrat, the party that is obsessed with race and identity politics. Screaming racism for everything or whatever "phobic" of the day or hour.
Who assumed that? Making assumptions about someone personally is not the same as questioning their language choices and remarks relative to racism or fascism.
On 10/31/2021 at 12:26 PM, MunoRN said:Yes, it's a way of saying that without actually saying it, but still gets across the bias you're trying to communicate. At this point it seems safe to assume you don't have another explanation for what you meant.
I didn't explain because my hair color comment had nothing to do with someone's sexual orientation. I really fo not care about who sleeps with who. There seems to be a general characteristic of extreemly loud radical white liberal women who like the alternate hair colors. I made a generalization about hair color. Ohhhh, it's not like I assigned hate and evil to a skin color or something. Geeez
35 minutes ago, toomuchbaloney said:Nonsense and garbage without any evidence to back up the claims.
The fact that you wrote a one word sentence speaks louder than your big word I'm so intellectual long rants could ever say.
36 minutes ago, toomuchbaloney said:You still haven't mastered the skill of quoting and keeping your comments separate from one another but have apparently perfected the skill of misrepresentation...no one implied that POC cannot or should not think for themselves.
Hair color was important enough for you to bring it up.
I'm not really interested in making things easier for you to read. The fact to comment on how I post says allot.
I made a joke about hair color. You know when you smile and a sound comes out of your face?
42 minutes ago, toomuchbaloney said:Who assumed that? Making assumptions about someone personally is not the same as questioning their language choices and remarks relative to racism or fascism.
You assumed I was white and a man! You probably assume my sexual orientation as well.
The reason I disclosed my race was because I was being accused of talking like a nazi. Or I would never have done so. I usually don't. However it disclosed your bias and stereotypical thought process. It was Aldo effective because I do not recall you associating me to a nazi or white supremacist again.
I mean seriously. A white supremacists nazi person of color? What?? Are there Jewish nazi type thinkers as well? Some thought the holocaust was good?
I mean look how idiotic those two statements are! That's why I disclosed my race.
By the way, I do not care that you are a white man. That doesn't make your opinion any less valid. I say that to demonstrate the hypocrisy of those who subscribe to the redicoulas white man bad ideology. I generally do not use a person's skin color to discredit their opinion. However you do frequently. So I threw it back at you. Pretty stupid right?
7 minutes ago, Cclm said:I'm not really interested in making things easier for you to read. The fact to comment on how I post says allot.
I made a joke about hair color. You know when you smile and a sound comes out of your face?
Your post was nonsense and garbage. There was nothing of substance within the remark to justify commenting on the words beyond acknowledging that they were based in and upon nonsense and garbage.
You didn't make a joke about hair color, so your current remark counts as an excuse for a comment that has been questioned.
Just now, toomuchbaloney said:Your post was nonsense and garbage. There was nothing of substance within the remark to justify commenting on the words beyond acknowledging that they were based in and upon nonsense and garbage.
You didn't make a joke about hair color, so your current remark counts as an excuse for a comment that has been questioned.
I'm the one who made the joke so there for I am the one to determine that. It had nothing to do with sexual orientation.
You think everything is stupid and garbage if you do not agree so why no long winded propaganda sourcing this time? Complete with negative conservative GOP generalizations oh and ypur favorite , Trump? Never stopped your before with your ad hominem strawman arguments?
3 minutes ago, Cclm said:
The reason I disclosed my race was because I was being accused of talking like a nazi.
That happens when people use the same communication tactics that were employed by the 3rd Reich.
5 minutes ago, Cclm said:I say that to demonstrate the hypocrisy of those who subscribe to the redicoulas white man bad ideology. I generally do not use a person's skin color to discredit their opinion. However you do frequently. So I threw it back at you. Pretty stupid right?
RIDICULOUS...that's how you spell that word...not redicoulas. You apparently use skin color to hide your bias and hair color to discredit other opinion, aeb the comments in these threads.
Yeah, you throw words around in threads that make me wonder if you really understand their meaning, history and implication.
Cclm, LPN
786 Posts
I really love how all the things I said, you are stuck on my sarcastic comment about hair color! Diversion much?