What NP Specialty Should I Choose?

There is this notion that the Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) specialty program should be the default, and this should not be the case. Specialties NP Article

First off, I believe that we need to stop this push to have anyone and everyone come into nursing just to become a Nurse Practitioner. We need to stop the "I just want to be a NP, but I'm not sure where I want to work," mentality. This article is not about this particular topic directly, but I believe it ties into the true purpose of this article. I feel many whom have no researched the NP profession thoroughly end up just settling on FNP. I also would love someone to write another article expanding on the Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS- multiple subspecialties much like the NP discipline) and Certified Nurse Midwife (CNM) facets of APRNs, as many individuals don't consider these specialties either as they are less popular.

I have seen many posts over the years about the correct specialty certification that one should have when pursuing Nurse Practitioner education. There is this notion that the Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) specialty program should be the default, and this should not be the case. Many individuals have a notion that they do want to transition from the bedside to the provider realm. Some individuals know exactly what area of advanced nursing they want to work in, others haven't the slightest clue, which is perfectly fine.

The problem that I have seen is that everyone and their brother wants to go to FNP school, instead of any of the other specialties. Now, FNP programs do have a wide scope of practice, but remember, the number of clinical hours may only be slightly more than other specialities, therefore, the clinical hours that one will have is spread very thin to all areas of clinical practice.

Is this a problem? Well, that depends on your end goal.

If your goal is to work in family practice, retail, or urgent care; the FNP specialty is right on for you due to the actual philosophy of the program. It is called Family NP for a reason, it gives to a broad, but somewhat superficial understanding of all of the systems across the lifespan (disclaimer- not saying that all FNPs have only a superficial understanding, but rather the focus of the typical/average FNP programs). This specialty is also great for those whom have not identified a particular area to practice. This would give that individual what they would need to be able to trial and error specialties.

When jumping to FNP is a problem- I have seen many posts and discussed with many aspiring NPs, "I'll just get a FNP cert, just because it gives me the most options." Honestly, the 'most options' is still being debated on. What isn't debated on is that if you know you want to go into a specialty, FNP is not likely going to be your best choice. I knew that I didn't want to work with kids or OB patients, I wanted to do either general internal medicine (adult medicine) or a specialty before I started school. I settled on Adult-Gero Primary Care NP (AGPCNP), with the intent to work in the area(s) that I had desire in.

"But wouldn't a physician want to hire someone who can see everyone?" One of the questions I hear a lot. The thing is, consider where I wanted to work: either adult health (IM) or adult specialty. Why would I need to know peds or OB if I didn't see peds or OB? One of the biggest motivating factors as to why I was able to get my job was the clinical area(s) that I completed my hours in. I completed all of my hours in adult health, internal medicine (with some basic OB primary care issues), urgent care, and cardio/nephro. I got my job over FNP candidates because my now boss saw that I had far more in-depth knowledge of adult disease, diagnostic, management etc, than my FNP counterparts. My certification and education fit far better into most of the jobs I was offered. We do nephrology in my practice- adult only. Remember, most specialty areas will do either adult or peds, not both.

I have met numerous NPs whom are FNPs, working in adult heath or a specialty with adults who wasted extra semesters trying to find Peds/OB clinical sites, extra semesters off because they couldn't find clinical sites, etc. Many of these FNPs knew they wanted to work in adult health, but wanted to 'keep their options as numerous as possible.' I have found FNPs wanting to work in women's health, whom are passed over for Women's Health NPs (WHNPs) due to the depth of knowledge discrepancy for the specialty.

In conclusion, the FNP certification/specialty should not always be a fall back, the go-to certification, or considered the best way to find a job. My thought is that if you want a NP job for the sake of a NP job, go for it. I wouldn't recommend just settling for a NP job unless you really are content with anything. No matter what, most of the learning as a NP does happen post-graduation, but remember, you still have to get a job and maintain the job long enough to learn.

Specializes in Med-Surg, NICU.

I am actually having this dilemma.

I work as a NICU RN FT and a med/surg RN contingent (started there casually). I LOVE my babies and would love to be an NNP. However...the schedule NNPs have in my neck of the woods sucks. Rotating shifts every six-week period, every third weekend and every other holiday. If someone calls in sick, an NNP has to stay over. Plus, they are no longer paid overtime as they became salaried (which is a rip-off). They are also expected to do extraneous stuff outside of work without pay as well.

As someone who would like a baby in the next few years, I don't think I could handle that kind of schedule. At most, I could see myself working two twelves back-to-back, but rotating would still be difficult. Plus, it is very limiting.

That being said, I have applied to FNP school (and will be applying to NNP school shortly) knowing fully well that as an FNP I will not be eligible for NNP positions and that I will most likely have a harder time finding a job out of school. NNPs are snatched up fairly quickly as there is a great shortage of them.

1 Votes
ThePrincessBride said:
I am actually having this dilemma.

I work as a NICU RN FT and a med/surg RN contingent (started there casually). I LOVE my babies and would love to be an NNP. However...the schedule NNPs have in my neck of the woods sucks. Rotating shifts every six-week period, every third weekend and every other holiday. If someone calls in sick, an NNP has to stay over. Plus, they are no longer paid overtime as they became salaried (which is a rip-off). They are also expected to do extraneous stuff outside of work without pay as well.

As someone who would like a baby in the next few years, I don't think I could handle that kind of schedule. At most, I could see myself working two twelves back-to-back, but rotating would still be difficult. Plus, it is very limiting.

That being said, I have applied to FNP school (and will be applying to NNP school shortly) knowing fully well that as an FNP I will not be eligible for NNP positions and that I will most likely have a harder time finding a job out of school. NNPs are snatched up fairly quickly as there is a great shortage of them.

If I were in your situation, I'd probably go with an FNP gig and work Neonatal contingent as an RN to get the baby fix. Keeping both a NNP and FNP certificates and doing the jobs of both would be an exercise in futility IMO. A lot of experience to keep up on two sides and from what you described, not the most compatible schedules between the two jobs.

1 Votes

My current preceptor spoke to me about nurse practitioner education and I thought I'd share.

Other medical providers are trained to take care of all ages, so why wouldn't nurse practitioners also be trained to learn to take care of all ages? Specialization in other areas can still be obtained with additional training/certification. However, standardized/baseline training of all ages should be required. It could prevent issues about ER needing FNP and ACNP. What would be the disadvantage?

1 Votes
Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.
Byna92 said:
My current preceptor spoke to me about nurse practitioner education and I thought I'd share.

Other medical providers are trained to take care of all ages, so why wouldn't nurse practitioners also be trained to learn to take care of all ages? Specialization in other areas can still be obtained with additional training/certification. However, standardized/baseline training of all ages should be required. It could prevent issues about ER needing FNP and ACNP. What would be the disadvantage?

It would make a major change to a successful model would be my biggest argument against it. It would also potentially result in increased cost, both to the profession and to the system.

1 Votes
Byna92 said:
My current preceptor spoke to me about nurse practitioner education and I thought I'd share.

Other medical providers are trained to take care of all ages, so why wouldn't nurse practitioners also be trained to learn to take care of all ages? Specialization in other areas can still be obtained with additional training/certification. However, standardized/baseline training of all ages should be required. It could prevent issues about ER needing FNP and ACNP. What would be the disadvantage?

I'm thinking some big organizations are making serious money on fragmentation as a whole. But to some degree I don't see the value in training for advance roles you have no intention of ever pursuing. Some people never want to work with kids and for them an ag path is a good focus.

Personally, I think the profession as a whole should be retooled toward the masters becoming a broad nonspecific nurse practitioner degree with a DNP focusing on dedicated fellowship paths of where an NP wishes to specialize.

1 Votes
BostonFNP said:
It would make a major change to a successful model would be my biggest argument against it. It would also potentially result in increased cost, both to the profession and to the system.

The push for DNP entry level as a whole adds needless increase cost to the system and profession. Might as well get a better product for it.

1 Votes
Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.
djmatte said:
The push for DNP entry level as a whole adds needless increase cost to the system and profession. Might as well get a better product for it.

The DNP-entry issue is a problem in a number of aspects, and I agree it adds cost without any evidence it adds quality. I think the larger concern is that NP accreditation needs to be revisited to ensure that programs are producing quality NPs regardless of degree.

1 Votes