Published
A story from the Daily Mail
Shocking if true but I tend to be a tad sceptical of tales in this particular newspaper.
It made me wonder about a couple of things.
If it was a "routine chest infection" why couldn't he walk to the sink and get himself a drink (ok all start flaming me) but nowhere in the article did it say he was bedbound.
The article also stated his condition wasn't life threatening but the nurses were instructed to keep "close tabs on him". What was the rationale behind this???
Every story has three sides. The families, the nurse involved, and the actual events (which we will never know because we weren't there)
It made me wonder about a couple of things.If it was a "routine chest infection" why couldn't he walk to the sink and get himself a drink (ok all start flaming me) but nowhere in the article did it say he was bedbound.
The article also stated his condition wasn't life threatening but the nurses were instructed to keep "close tabs on him". What was the rationale behind this???
Every story has three sides. The families, the nurse involved, and the actual events (which we will never know because we weren't there)
It did say he was on O2 and IVABs...maybe too wired up? Plus, our hospital only has drining water in the kitchen, the ward sinks are not to be used for drinking from, so maybe this was the situation here? Also possible that the only sink was in the bathroom and he was too weak to walk without the oxygen....I don't know obviously, I am just throwing ideas out here!
As you say, we will never know what happened, because we were not there.
stormforce
38 Posts
Firstly, BBC news reports that NHS managers numbers have risen to 45,000 over the past year, and during the same period nursing and midwifery posts have been reduced by 2%
Go figure http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8587122.stm
Also reported is that NHS England have presented proposed spending cuts to the government with the aim of saving up to £20 billion by 2010
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8590710.stm
Now I am a strong advocate of the National Health Service but I am concerned about the sustainability of a quality service when faced with such proposals. I understand the need for management in the NHS I really do, but increased managers when the numbers of clinical staff are being reduced I struggle to understand.
Can you imagine going into a restaurant to be told that because of cutbacks your waitress was serving twice the number of tables that day and it may well be that you would have to wait just that little bit longer for service, you'd not go there again would you and yet I fear that this is what we are asking our patients to do, with their health which is far more important than dining out, and without the choice of seeking a better service elsewhere.
I'm not sure what the answer is but I truly am concerned about what this means for our poor patients.