Published Nov 9, 2012
Elleveein, LVN
325 Posts
One more question. Is it better to do a bridge program or go in as a regular student and do the full 2 yrs. I'd like to hear opinions from both sides. Please and thank you :)
SquishyRN, BSN, RN
523 Posts
If you're already an LVN, going the regular route would be a waste of both time and money in my opinion.
RN/Mom
115 Posts
TheCommuter, BSN, RN
102 Articles; 27,612 Posts
Some LVNs lack confidence and feel more reassured by enrolling in a generic RN program.
I personally feel they're wasting time and money. The bridge program allows you to bypass the first year, saves time, and grants credit for your hard-earned LVN license. In addition, the LVN who lacks confidence in his/her skills and knowledge is still going to learn plenty while attending a bridge program.
MCRMS
28 Posts
I agree with the comments above but if getting in is as competitive where you are as it is here, get in where ever you can. In my opinion, 1 year is better than 2 but 2 is better than 0. Good luck to you. ?
sillylilly05
47 Posts
I think it depends. Ive been an LPN for almost a year and work in a doctors office where i never do my skills. Ive tried to get into 2 lpn-rn programs but didn't get it bc i couldn't pass the hesi. I found a program that i will get in automatically and since im an lpn i get to skip the first semester then will get in the second semester with the rn class..so i will kind of have to start over but i think it will help since i don't remember my skills.
I work in a clinic as well, so I know what you mean about not using your skills. Not working as a nurse in acute care makes me really nervous, I've been an LVN since 5/26/2011, I've worked in a doctors office/clinic since before i got licensed.