Published Sep 26, 2015
SleeepyRN
1,076 Posts
Hello. I graduated nursing school 3 years ago. We learned that the reference range for patients on Coumadin is 2.0 - 3.0 and maybe 0.5 higher if at especially great risk for a blood clot.
Well, I admitted a patient the other day who had a hx of PE leading to cardiac arrest and ultimately brain anoxia. He was admitted to our rehab facility after a short stay in the hospital d/t aspiration pneumonia and sepsis. He is completely immobile, does not respond to verbal commands nor makes any attempt to move any body part on his own. Upon admission he was on 7.5 mg Coumadin and 60mg lovenox.
Upon viewing his labs, I saw his INR was 2.6 with an H next to it. So I looked at the hospital's reference range. I was surprised to see
0.86 - 1.8.
I remember learning SOMETHING in nursing school about certain individuals reference range falling between those numbers. But I don't remember what. I can't for the life of me figure out why the hospital's INR reference range would be this low, especially for a patient with a hx of DVTs, PE and ultimately cardiac arrest. Thoughts?
I feel I've been away from bedside too long and that I've forgotten SO much. I'm actually reading my nursing books again and listening to lectures.
jadelpn, LPN, EMT-B
9 Articles; 4,800 Posts
The hospital's reference range could be for patients who are not on anti-coagulants.
Usually, the MD orders suggest a range where they would like to see the patient. And that MAY be below 2. (2-3 can be joint replacement, some patients with A-fib)
Check the orders to see if it is listed beside the medications. If there is no therapeutic range indicated, then I would ask for one. Lovenox and Coumadin at 7.5 (and Coumadin usually has a 48 hour window) you need some sort of goal.
MunoRN, RN
8,058 Posts
The reference range is a standardized number for patients not on warfarin, the lab result template doesn't know what the goal range for that particular patient is.
icuRNmaggie, BSN, RN
1,970 Posts
[TABLE=class: table_layout, width: 650]
[TR]
[TD=class: align-left]Key statements from 9th ACCP guidelines
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TD=class: align-left][TABLE=class: table_layout_inset, width: 636]
[TD=class: auto-style1, bgcolor: #FF9999]Indication[/TD]
[TD=class: auto-style1, bgcolor: #FF9999]INR (range)[/TD]
[TD=class: auto-style1, bgcolor: #FF9999]Evidence[/TD]
[TD]Optimal Therapeutic INR Range[/TD]
[TD] INR range of 2.0 to 3.0 (target INR of 2.5)[/TD]
[TD] (Grade 1B)[/TD]
[TD]Therapeutic Range for High-Risk Groups -patients with antiphospholipid syndrome with previous arterial or venous thromboembolism[/TD]
[TD]Moderate intensity INR range (INR 2.0-3.0) rather than higher intensity (INR 3.0-4.5)[/TD]
[TD] (Grade 2B)[/TD]
[TD]DVT of the leg[/TD]
[TD]INR range of 2.0 to 3.0 (target INR of 2.5)[/TD]
[TD](Grade 1B)[/TD]
[TD]PE[/TD]
[TD]Patients With AF and Stable Coronary Artery Disease (no acute coronary syndrome within the previous year)[/TD]
[TD] Adjusted-dose warfarin therapy alone - INR range of 2.0 to 3.0 (target INR of 2.5) rather than the combination of adjusted-dose warfarin therapy and aspirin[/TD]
[TD](Grade 2C)[/TD]
[TD]Mechanical mitral valve[/TD]
[TD]INR target of 3.0 (range, 2.5-3.5)[/TD]
[TD]Intensity of Warfarin Therapy in Patients With Double Mechanical Valve or With Additional Risk Factors (mechanical heart valves in both the aortic and mitral position)[/TD]
[TD] INR target of 3.0 (range 2.5-3.5)[/TD]
[TD]Bioprosthetic valve in the mitral position[/TD]
[TD]Target INR, 2.5; range, 2.0-3.0) over no warfarin therapy for the first 3 months after valve insertion[/TD]
[TD]Prevention of Recurrent VTE in Pregnant Women[/TD]
[TD]Postpartum prophylaxis for 6 weeks with prophylactic- or intermediate-dose LMWH or warfarin targeted at INR 2.0 to 3.0 rather than no prophylaxis[/TD]
[TD](Grade 2B)[/TD]
[/TABLE]
[TD=class: align-left][TABLE=class: table_cent_yellow, width: 0]
[TD]For additional guidance please review:
Guyatt GH, Akl EA, Crowther M, Gutterman DD, Schuünemann HJ; American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Panel. Executive summary: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):7S-47S. doi: 10.1378/chest.1412S3.[/TD]
[TD=class: align-left]Statements from previous guidelines:
[TD=class: align-left]Venous Thromboembolism (including [DVT] and PE)
Adjust the warfarin dose to maintain a target INR of 2.5 (INR range, 2.0-3.0) for all treatment durations. The duration of treatment is based on the indication as follows:
Atrial Fibrillation
In patients with non-valvular AF, anticoagulate with warfarin to target INR of 2.5 (range, 2.0-3.0).
Mechanical and Bioprosthetic Heart Valves
Post-Myocardial Infarction
Recurrent Systemic Embolism and Other Indications
Oral anticoagulation therapy with warfarin has not been fully evaluated by clinical trials in patients with valvular disease associated with AF, patients with mitral stenosis, and patients with recurrent systemic embolism of unknown etiology. However, a moderate dose regimen (INR 2.0-3.0) may be used for these patients.[/TD]
[TD=class: align-left][TABLE=width: 636]
[TD=class: style7, bgcolor: #FFCC99]Condition[/TD]
[TD=class: style7, bgcolor: #FFCC99]Targeted INR[/TD]
[TD]Acute myocardial infarction (high-risk):
High-risk includes a large anterior MI, significant heart failure, intracardiac thrombus, thromboembolism[/TD]
[TD]Range: 2.0 -3.0
Targeted INR: 2.5
Combine with aspirin 81 mg/day.
Maintain anticoagulation for at least 3 months.[/TD]
[TD]Antiphospholipid Syndrome (no other risk factors):[/TD]
Treatment length: lifetime[/TD]
[TD]Antiphospholipid Syndrome and recurrent thromboembolism:[/TD]
[TD]INR range: 2.5-3.5
Targeted INR: 3.0
[TD]Bioprosthetic (tissue) Valve
• Mitral Valve (MVR):[/TD]
[TD]Goal INR 2.5: range, 2.0 - 3.0;
duration 3 months and then aspirin therapy (81mg/d)[/TD]
• Aortic Valve (AVR). NSR. no other indication for warfarin therapy[/TD]
[TD]ASA (50 to 100 mg/day)[/TD]
-history of systemic embolism[/TD]
Treatment length: for at least 3 months after valve insertion, followed by clinical reassessment[/TD]
-additional risk factors for thromboembolism, including AF, hypercoagulable state, or low ejection fraction[/TD]
Chest guidelines3:
low-dose aspirin (50 to 100 mg/d) should be considered, particularly in patients with history of atherosclerotic vascular disease. Omit ASA in patients with bioprosthetic heart valves who are at particularly high risk of bleeding, such as in patients with history of GI bleed or in patients > 80 years of age[/TD]
[TD]Patients with MVP who have AF, documented systemic embolism, or recurrent TIAs despite ASA therapy:[/TD]
Targeted INR: 2.5 [/TD]
[TD]Rheumatic mitral valve disease with AF who suffer systemic embolism or have left atrial thrombus while receiving warfarin at a therapeutic INR[/TD]
[TD]Add low-dose ASA (50 to 100 mg/d) after consideration of the additional hemorrhagic risk. Alternative strategy: adjustment of warfarin dosing to achieve a higher target INR (target INR, 3.0; range, 2.5 to 3.5).[/TD]
[TD]Rheumatic mitral valve disease complicated singly or in combination by the presence of AF, previous systemic embolism, or left atrial thrombus[/TD]
Targeted INR: 2.5[/TD]
[TD]Rheumatic mitral valve disease and normal sinus rhythm with a left atrial diameter > 55 mm[/TD]
[TD]Venous thromboembolism:[/TD]
Treatment length: variable[/TD]
[TD=class: style7, bgcolor: #FFCC99, colspan: 2]Mechanical Prosthetic Valve:[/TD]
[TD]Bileaflet mechanical valve in the aortic position, left atrium of normal size, NSR, normal ejection fraction[/TD]
[TD]Bileaflet mechanical aortic valve and Thromboembolism Risk Factors (AF)[/TD]
[TD]First generation aortic valve
(i.e. caged ball or caged disk)[/TD]
Targeted INR: 3.0[/TD]
[TD]Mitral Valve (MVR) – all mitral valves with or
without risk factors for thromboembolism[/TD]
[TD]St Jude Medical bileaflet mechanical aortic valve:[/TD]
[TD]Tilting disk valve or bileaflet mechanical valve in themitral position[/TD]
[TD]Modern aortic valve with atrial fibrillation or other risk factor(s) for thromboembolism1
-Carbomedics bileaflet
-Medtronic Hall tilting disk[/TD]
[TD]CarboMedics bileaflet valves or Medtronic Hall tilting disk mechanical valve in the aortic position, normal left atrium, and sinus rhythm[/TD]
[TD]Mechanical prosthetic valve with systemic embolism despite adequate anticoagulation:[/TD]
Treatment length: lifetime
Combine with aspirin 81 mg/day
"In patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves who have systemic embolism despite a therapeutic INR, we suggest the addition of ASA (50 to 100 mg/d) if not previously provided and/or upward titration of warfarin therapy to achieve a higher target INR. For a previous target INR of 2.5, we suggest the warfarin dose be increased to achieve a target INR of 3.0 (range, 2.5 to 3.5). For a previous target INR of 3.0, we suggest the warfarin dose be increased to achieve a target INR of 3.5 (range, 3.0 to 4.0) [Grade 2C]."[/TD]
[TD]Mechanical valve and risk factors (atrial fibrillation, MI, left atrial enlargement, low EF, endocardial damage)[/TD]
Combine with aspirin 81 mg/day unless patient at particularly high risk of bleeding, such as in patients with history of GI bleed, or in patients > 80 years of age[/TD]
1. Thromboembolism Risk Factors:
• Atrial fibrillation
• Left atrium enlargement
• Low left-ventricular ejection fraction
• Age
• Prior thromboembolism
• Hypercoagulable state
[TD=class: style2, bgcolor: #CCFFFF, align: center]References:
[TD]1. Ansell J, Hirsh J, Hylek E, Jacobson A, et al. Pharmacology and Management of the Vitamin K Antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. 2008 (suppl 6);133:160s-198s.
[TD]2. Package insert data.
[TD]3. Salem DN, O'Gara PT, C, Pauker SG. Valvular and structural heart disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008 Jun;133(6 Suppl):593S-629S.[/TD]