Published
Few ways we use statistics in critical care is in terms of measuring outcomes. Reimbursement is increasingly tied to quality nowadays so we do concern ourselves with our rates of Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections, Catheter-related Urinary Tract Infections, Compliance with Sepsis Bundles, Ventilator Associated Pneumonias, etc. to make sure we are way below national numbers.
I agree with BostonFNP. It helps to understand the literature. Beyond that, we've got a "quality" person 300 miles away that crunches numbers for us and generates lovely reports that make for great conversation and comparison in staff meetings.
In all seriousness, it really does help in understanding literature.
I understand how important it is to critically evaluate research output in healthcare as part of evidence-based practice but I thought the OP was asking for ways NP's use statistics other than the "obvious answer" of evidence-based practice.
You're right, Juan, but I can't think of a way me or my colleague's use statistics so I offered the only answer my practice setting has.
The research model will take data from a smaller sample to infer data about a population. (i.e. In a sample of 1000 people, 900 passed the NCLEX on their first attempt, thus most people pass on their first attempt.)
In practice, many times we use statistics to take data from a larger sample and use it in the smallest population. (i.e. In most people this medication works to lower blood pressure with minimal side effects, let's try it on you.)
Meh, perhaps not so new. Just some thoughts.
nikkid973
4 Posts
Hi,
I am hoping some of you may have some insight-I am doing some research for my biostatistics class and was wondering how NPs use statistics in everyday practice. The obvious answer is evidenced -based practice, but I would love some input or new perspectives! If you have something to add please take a minute and give me your thoughts, I really appreciate it! Thanks