Published
My daughter works 3 12's for 36 hours and is considered full time for benefit purposes. Usually when you have that 3 12 schedule it counts as full time. Others count as full time for benefit purposes if you work as little as 32 hours. It depends on how they have their benefits structured. I would definitely make it a point to get this answered by the recruiter, although I don't think you need to worry. Good luck with the new job.
At my hospital anything under 40 hr/wk is considered part time. A 36 hour week is .9 of full time. A 32 hour wk is .8 of full time. My hospital provides benefits to anyone who works a .6 or greater. I know very few nurses who work a 40 hour week, and they are 20+ year employees of the hospital; full time positions are not even offered anymore where I work.
At my hospital anything under 40 hr/wk is considered part time. A 36 hour week is .9 of full time. A 32 hour wk is .8 of full time. My hospital provides benefits to anyone who works a .6 or greater. I know very few nurses who work a 40 hour week, and they are 20+ year employees of the hospital; full time positions are not even offered anymore where I work.
Thank you for the info, after you put ".9" in your post I could almost hear the recruiter in my head saying that my position was .9...I feel a bit better :)
My employer provides benefits for anyone working 16+ hours weekly. 32/hrs per pay period. 3-12's is DEFINATELY fulltime.
Now, the rate of pay is lower then in the past. Some of the LPN's make WAY more money then I do, or probably ever will. Thats only because they have worked there for years... it use to be, on your anniversary, you could get a 4,6 or 8% pay increase, depending upon how the DON rated you on your yearly eval. Now, EVERYONE, on their employment anniversary receives a 2% pay increase, regardless of eval. The decrease in pay increases was enacted just prior to my one year eval (figures:o) because of the downturn in the economy. (Kinda odd, the price of groceries, and cost of living has jumped up significantly in the past year).
We pay for our benefits, and guess what??? the amount we have to pay for these benefits has increased significantly, beginning in Jan.2010.
I've never been "overpaid" and I don't think my rate of pay is "exceptional", I definately work hard for the money I earn. That being said, if employers are saying 36/hr wk. is not full time, that would be an employer I would avoid. We are not union (my past life included 28yrs. in a union, thankgod, I may have a retirement benefit at some point). I'm not "pro-union", yet, if employers are not giving full time benefits for 36/hr wks. perhaps some areas may want to check into unionization. History does have a way of repeating itself (or so I've heard), maybe if some people looked into why/when/where the unions came from, they may change their "I will accept anything to just have a job" attitude, and stand up for benefits for the HARD work they do.
I'm curious, who out their believes 36/hrs a week is truly less then full time??? And why? Do you really only work 36/hrs wkly? What about all the breaks/lunches not taken? Staying late charting and not getting pd. for it?
NurseDevonL
57 Posts
Hello all!
I just recieved my offical employment letter for my upcoming job, which states my position is "part-time". However when speaking with the nursing recruiter I was told I would be working 36 hours (rotating could do 8's or 12's). I NEED these hours as I am moving out of state for this job.
I am just a bit freaked out, my recruiter wasnt in today for me to speak with her, I WILL be calling her to confirm. does anyone else work where 36 hours is still considered part-time? Ugh i have a sinking feeling in my stomach now and I am worried sick about this...