Published
Are you routinely checking and documenting a Homan's sign on a normal lady partsl delivery patient? C-section?
As with many nursing myths, we wait until the scientific community has moved on then reassert our previous misconceptions. Homan's sign has no clinical value and risks causing an embolism in the case of a proximal DVT.
Just wait long enough, people once again believe in suffocation by oxygen administration and renal dose dopamine. Some day, nurses will actually become scientists and test the truth rather than rely on popular beliefs. Hey, what ever happened to bleeding a patient with febrile symptoms? I don't seem to find any literature stating that bleeding a patient is harmful.
I am new to L&D but came from a surgical/surgical ICU floor, learned in nursing school not to do homans, in the hospital I work at people do it so they can fill in the blank in meditech for homans, I never did it because I have read enough to defend myself in not doing it. But now that I am in L&D all of the nurses do it when they are checking for clonus, I was shown to check for clonus in the same way you perform homans.....if there is a chance of dislodging a clot with homans wouldn't there also be a risk when checking for clonus? or is there a different way to check for clonus?
hypocaffeinemia, BSN, RN
1,381 Posts
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Sep 11;143(37):1861-3
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=hstat6.table.42211
Sensitivity: 13-48% (aka useless)
There's a theoretical risk of dislodging a thrombus by performing the test, although to the best of my searching skills, I can't find any literature or non-anecdotal case studies demonstrating this risk.
The reason not to do it, then, is because the evidence doesn't support it as a meaningful test. The majority of people with (+) DVT will have a (-) Homan's and it's likely many with a (+) Homan's may have (-) DVT.
---
By the way, I think it should be Homans' instead of Homan's as the doctor it is named after was John Homans.