Probably no other nursing diagnosis has garnered as much controversy as this one:
QuoteDisturbed Energy Field
definition: disruption of the flow of energy [aura] surrounding a person's being that
results in a disharmony of the body, mind, and/or spirit
Related Factors
Slowing or blocking of energy flows secondary to:
pathophysologic factors--illness (specify), pregnancy, injury
treatment-related factors--immobility, labor and delivery, perioperative experience, chemotherapy
situational factors (personal environment)--pain, fear, anxiety, grieving
maturational factors--age-related developmental difficulties or crisis (specify)
Defining Characteristics
Objective
Perception of changes in patterns flow, such as--
- movement (wave/spike/tingling/dense/flowing)
- sounds (tone/words)
- temperature change (warmth/coolness)
- visual changes (image/color)
- disruption of the field
- (deficient/hole/spike/bulge/obstruction/congestion/diminished flow in energy
- field)
Desired outcomes/evaluation criteria--client will:
- acknowledge feelings of anxiety and distress.
- verbalize sense of relaxation/well-being.
- display reduction in severity/frequency of symptoms.
Energy field disturbance - Wikipedia
What is your opinion of "disturbed energy field?" Does nanda need to drop this, as not being scientifically sound, or do we need to keep this, as this attests to the inclusiveness and holistic nature of nursing?