Published Jun 25, 2008
Neats, BSN
682 Posts
I have tried to be a sponge and try to understand care plans, with experience I am getting better. Thanks to all of you nurses on this site!!!This care plan I am suppose to complete has me at a loss (maybe my brain is just overloaded at this point) Please help!! Guide me!!
Assessment Data: (not in any order)
client 3.5 years old born 24 weeks gestation with multiple cardio abnormalities was on ventilator for 4 months
Current Assessment:
lungs clear, vitals WNL, skin brown, W&D
receives nutrition via pureed food PO
sleeps in crib turnning schedule Q2 hours x 24 hours
only rolls side to side
can grab at developmental level of 0-6 month old
cannot speak,
recent parents move out of state and has new guardian (hard for parents, best for client)
DNR
has NOT had seziure past 2 years
last aspirated one year ago
for the year 2005 received no follow up care
miminal medication ie chewable vita, pedicare PRN, Nasal spray daily, and stool softner PRN.
Primary Med DX congential heart disease W/ASD 2nd to premature
Seizure disorder, s/p ligation of PDA. Current neuro consult indicates scoliosis-POC monitor and re-eval annually and recently-
MD found NO significant heart disease.
MRI findings of white matter volume loss-chronic peri ventricular leukomalacia and complete loss of R cerebellar hemisphere
Theraputic interventions include weekly PT, OT,
Is currently in LTC and is receiving great care. I know there are multiple issues but right now current problems are maintenance issues and I do not want to use Risk for or developmental delay as client will never reach goals, never recover will always be at developmental level of 0-6 months. I ahve grouped all assessments together and just am unsure of nursing diagnoses. I am leaning towards some type of feeding pattern as number one priority and the reason is because you need food to live, immobility and then I am not sure??????Help please. Thank you to all who respond
Daytonite, BSN, RN
1 Article; 14,604 Posts
care planning relies on following the steps of the nursing process:
all care planning begins with assessment. you said, "i have grouped all assessments together and just am unsure of nursing diagnoses." i went through the data you posted and this is how i assembled it for step #2 of the nursing process.
[*]complications
[*]mri findings of white matter volume loss-chronic peri ventricular leukomalacia and complete loss of r cerebellar hemisphere
[*]history of aspiration one year ago
[*]abnormal data
[*]cannot speak
[*]recent parents have moved out of state and has new guardian
the choice of using any nursing diagnosis is dependent on the evidence you have to support it. that is why you need to have the abnormal nursing assessment data and it needs to be as developed and refined as you can make it. yes, he is developmentally delayed. he has signs and symptoms of this that need to be addressed or he will never survive and i'm guessing that is what you were meaning. his physical condition is never going to allow him to advance much farther mentally. he's got a lot of physical mobility problems.
let me digress a moment because i worked off and on in long term care as well as in acute hospitals for many years. it is a misconception that medicine and nursing can "cure". more properly, there are three options available to the goals (outcomes) of the care we provide:
a lot of people would not like to even consider that patients can deteriorate and die, but they do. some of the hardest care plans for students to write for the first time are care plans on cancer patients who expected to die. we would like for all our interventions to return people to a useful, productive life. it isn't always gonna happen. during my student clinicals years ago, i did a rotation at a pediatric nursing home and i saw the kind of patient you are writing this care plan for. and, yes, it is basically a plan about dealing with day to day accomplishments of adls.
so, part of your assessment should include the patient's level to help at all in performing adls of
[*]eating - eats a pureed diet. how? is he fed? by who?
[*]toilet use - continent or incontinent?
[*]grooming - can the patient do this at all?
the results of the above is your evidence that will support the nursing diagnoses you will use with regard to self-care deficits, and there are 4 of them.
however, you have other abnormal pieces of assessment data that i think you should not ignore. the fact that this child cannot speak and has communication problems ([color=#3366ff]impaired verbal communication), an emotional/bonding issue with a new guardian on board, a risk for injury because of seizures ([color=#3366ff]risk for injury). i would also be concerned about potential respiratory problems ([color=#3366ff]risk for infection) and pain as issues with a scoliosis problem ([color=#3366ff]chronic pain).
hope that gives you some direction.
http://cyfernet.ces.ncsu.edu/cyfdb/browse_2pageanncc.php?subcat=children+with+special+needs&search=nncc&search_type=browse - children with special needs
Oh Daytonite you are such a wonderful mentor. You are the reason nurses are so thought of highly.
My client does not perform any ADL's, and has no control over bowl/bladder and is fed by staff, you guessed right about my thoght process in regards to nutrition.
Your response has pointed me in the right direction and I suppose I do have to use Risk for I was hoping I would not have to. I will look a little more to see if I can be creative and use critical thinking skills.
Again thank you so very much...I hope you write a book about ND I would be the first to buy it.
Most of your nursing problems (nursing diagnoses) will be actual ones and will be related to self-care deficits. This is very common with long-term care patients. Just sequence them in priority order (food, elimination, mobility, comfort). You should address the communication and emotional need problems (everybody needs love of some kind) as well. That's going to end up being a big care plan for this patient. Mobility issues and treatment alone is going to be a big part of your care plan. Finally, at the end, you can tack on a couple of potential problems if you want. I didn't even think about skin breakdown, but it is a potential complication of the immobility.
Nat71
14 Posts
Hello Daytonite,
I would like to find out if you could help me with my POC? I read a lot of books but when it comes to write simple POC I don't think I get it...I haven't practice Nursing in more than 5 years.
Bob is a 34 year old homosexual male, living with his partner of 14 years who is a newly diagnosed with leukemia.
Client should have 3 problems.
Refresher Course gave me sample POC:
Problem #1
Outcome/Goal:
Interventions:
Evaluation:
I wrote 3 problems but I am not sure if I done that correctly, Please help/guide me...
Problem # 1: Knowledge Deficit regarding disease, prognosis, treatment, self-care.
Outcome/Goal: Illness care.
Interventions: Teaching disease process, review pathology of specific form
leukemia and various treatment options.
Evaluation: Knowledge of illness care, patient understanding of
condition/disease process and potential complication, verbalize
of understanding of therapeutic needs, participate in treatment
regimen.
Problem #2: Risk for Infection
Outcome/Goal: Knowledge of Infection Control
Interventions:Infection Protection. Screen/limit visitors as indicated, prohibit
use of live plants/cut flowers. Use alcohol gels to clean hands
when water not available. Restrict fresh fruits and vegetables or
make sure they are washed or peeled. Inspect oral mucous
membranes. Provide good oral hygiene. Use a soft toothbrush,
ponge, or swabs for frequent mouth care. Avoid/limit invasive
procedures. Check for Gram's stain cultures/sensitivity, HIV
test for partner.
Evaluation: Client will:
Identify actions to prevent/reduce risk of infection.
Demonstrate techniques, lifestyle changes to promote safe
environment, achieve timely healing.
Problem #3: Ineffective Role Performance--change in physical capacity and
activity intolerance.
Outcome/Goal: Endurance
Interventions: Energy Management- Evaluate reports of fatigue, noting inability
to participate in activities or ADLs. Encourage client to keep a
diary of daily routines and energy levels, noting activities that
increase fatigue. Implement energy -saving techniques; e.g., sitting, rather than standing.
Provide supplemental oxygen.
Evaluation: Client reports a measurable increase in activity tolerance.
Participates in ADLs to level of ability.
Demonstrates a decrease in physiological signs of
intolerance; e.g.
pulse, respiration, and BP remain within client's normal range.
Client/significant other are participating in ongoing
treatment/support programs.
hello daytonite,i would like to find out if you could help me with my poc? i read a lot of books but when it comes to write simple poc i don't think i get it...i haven't practice nursing in more than 5 years. bob is a 34 year old homosexual male, living with his partner of 14 years who is a newly diagnosed with leukemia. client should have 3 problems.refresher course gave me sample poc:problem #1outcome/goal:interventions:evaluation:i wrote 3 problems but i am not sure if i done that correctly, please help/guide me... problem # 1: knowledge deficit regarding disease, prognosis, treatment, self-care. outcome/goal: illness care. interventions: teaching disease process, review pathology of specific form leukemia and various treatment options. evaluation: knowledge of illness care, patient understanding of condition/disease process and potential complication, verbalize of understanding of therapeutic needs, participate in treatment regimen. problem #2: risk for infection outcome/goal: knowledge of infection control interventions:infection protection. screen/limit visitors as indicated, prohibit use of live plants/cut flowers. use alcohol gels to clean hands when water not available. restrict fresh fruits and vegetables or make sure they are washed or peeled. inspect oral mucous membranes. provide good oral hygiene. use a soft toothbrush, ponge, or swabs for frequent mouth care. avoid/limit invasive procedures. check for gram's stain cultures/sensitivity, hiv test for partner. evaluation: client will:identify actions to prevent/reduce risk of infection.demonstrate techniques, lifestyle changes to promote safe environment, achieve timely healing. problem #3: ineffective role performance--change in physical capacity and activity intolerance. outcome/goal: endurance interventions: energy management- evaluate reports of fatigue, noting inability to participate in activities or adls. encourage client to keep a diary of daily routines and energy levels, noting activities that increase fatigue. implement energy -saving techniques; e.g., sitting, rather than standing.provide supplemental oxygen. evaluation: client reports a measurable increase in activity tolerance.participates in adls to level of ability.demonstrates a decrease in physiological signs of intolerance; e.g. pulse, respiration, and bp remain within client's normal range.client/significant other are participating in ongoing treatment/support programs.
i would like to find out if you could help me with my poc? i read a lot of books but when it comes to write simple poc i don't think i get it...i haven't practice nursing in more than 5 years.
bob is a 34 year old homosexual male, living with his partner of 14 years who is a newly diagnosed with leukemia.
client should have 3 problems.
refresher course gave me sample poc:
problem #1
outcome/goal:
interventions:
evaluation:
i wrote 3 problems but i am not sure if i done that correctly, please help/guide me...
problem # 1: knowledge deficit regarding disease, prognosis, treatment, self-care.
outcome/goal: illness care.
interventions: teaching disease process, review pathology of specific form
evaluation: knowledge of illness care, patient understanding of
problem #2: risk for infection
outcome/goal: knowledge of infection control
interventions:infection protection. screen/limit visitors as indicated, prohibit
use of live plants/cut flowers. use alcohol gels to clean hands
when water not available. restrict fresh fruits and vegetables or
make sure they are washed or peeled. inspect oral mucous
membranes. provide good oral hygiene. use a soft toothbrush,
ponge, or swabs for frequent mouth care. avoid/limit invasive
procedures. check for gram's stain cultures/sensitivity, hiv
evaluation: client will:
identify actions to prevent/reduce risk of infection.
demonstrate techniques, lifestyle changes to promote safe
problem #3: ineffective role performance--change in physical capacity and
outcome/goal: endurance
interventions: energy management- evaluate reports of fatigue, noting inability
to participate in activities or adls. encourage client to keep a
increase fatigue. implement energy -saving techniques; e.g., sitting, rather than standing.
provide supplemental oxygen.
evaluation: client reports a measurable increase in activity tolerance.
participates in adls to level of ability.
demonstrates a decrease in physiological signs of
pulse, respiration, and bp remain within client's normal range.
client/significant other are participating in ongoing
did i read this scenario correctly? would this problem have made any difference if it had been written as bob is a 34 year old man, whose wife of 14 years has been newly diagnosed with leukemia? at least, that is how i am reading this statement. bob is the significant other of the patient. so, bob is most likely going to end up being the caregiver or support person. the focus of the care plan needs to be on bob, not the person with the leukemia. the person with leukemia, while important, is secondary. so, along with that legal issues might come up, as many states do not recognize a homosexual partner when it comes to next of kin issues, bob is probably going to end up as the caregiver of his partner if i read this correctly.
physical assessment is really not an issue for bob. however, assessing things like finances, health insurance coverage of the patient, his knowledge of the patient's disease, disease process, the treatment that is being planned and how that is going to be accomplished, his flexibility to be able to cope, social networks that he has available to him, or not, and cultural practices must all be examined. anything abnormal becomes the data that will form the foundation for the problems that will be part of this care plan for bob.
this diagnosis is unnecessary. bob, the caregiver, isn't at a risk for infection and this doesn't apply to him, so i'm not even going to address anything about what you have posted here.
problem: ineffective role performance--change in physical capacity and activity intolerance.
bob is definitely going to have a change in his role, but is it going to be ineffective role performance? this is where doing an assessment points the way to a correct diagnosis since each diagnosis has a set of defining characteristics of which the patient must possess at least one. psychosocial/cultural assessments are more complex and difficult to do.
when you are working with a nursing diagnosis that you never worked with before you should always look at its definition since that is the true expression of the problem. ineffective role performance is merely its label (diagnosis). the true problem defined is patterns of behavior and self-expression that do not match the environmental context, norms, and expectations (page 180, nanda-i nursing diagnoses: definitions & classification 2007-2008). that does not fit with the change in physical capacity and activity intolerance that you have listed next to the diagnosis of ineffective role performance. i am going to suggest that a change in physical capacity and activity intolerance is more along the lines of caregiver role strain, or risk for caregiver role strain. this is why:
caregiver role strain (page 29-31, nanda-i nursing diagnoses: definitions & classification 2007-2008)
definition: difficulty in performing family caregiver role. [this is very different from being ineffective, incompetent, or inefficient at performing the role.]
related factors (causes of the problem, etiologies) [these are things that would have been revealed during an interview and assessment]
[*]caregiver health status
[*]caregiver-care receiver relationship
[*]caregiving activities [these are the etiologies that support your idea of change in physical capacity and activity tolerance in bob, the caregiver]
[*]family processes
[*]resources
[*]socioeconomic
defining characteristics (the abnormal data, the signs and symptoms that are the evidence of this problem--the patient, bob, must have one or more of them)
[*]emotional
i posted all of the above from the nanda taxonomy to help you with assessing this kind of situation and to clarify exactly what this specific nursing problem is. it should also give you an idea of what the significant other of an ill person can experience--and those are the kinds of things you need to be assessing for.
in looking at what you have posted, endurance cannot be an outcome/goal since the definition of this diagnosis is "patterns of behavior and self-expression that do not match the environmental context, norms, and expectations". to me endurance is not a pattern of behavior, but an ability that one either has or doesn't have.also, i looked at the things you have listed under interventions and evaluation and i am not clear that they refer to bob or the person with leukemia.
problem: knowledge deficit regarding disease, prognosis, treatment, self-care.
knowledge deficit is more correctly written as deficient knowledge (specify). that means you must state the subject of what is lacking. since the nursing diagnosis is only a label (tag, title) it needs to be as short as possible. so, saying regarding disease, prognosis, treatment, self-care is saying too much in the diagnosis label. just say knowledge deficit, leukemia or deficient knowledge, leukemia.
a person has a knowledge deficit because they are dumb, don't want to learn, apathetic, don't have access to the information, or just don't know where to go to find the information in the first place. often it's due to a lack to information, but occasionally you'll run into patients that don't want to learn. you can see the nanda information for this diagnosis listed on this webpage: [color=#3366ff]deficient knowledge (specify). the goal(s) need to match with and be the predicted results of your interventions.
interventions: teaching disease process, review pathology of specific form leukemia and various treatment options.
there are four types of nursing interventions (actions), they include the following:
it is appropriate for a deficient knowledge problem that you are going to assess, evaluate or observe what bob knows and doesn't know about leukemia, it's prognosis, the treatment that his partner is going to be undergoing, what his partner is going to need assistance with and specifically bob's assistance and what bob may know already about caregiving. so, you will have interventions for that. then, you will have interventions to specifically teach/educate/instruct bob in procedures, if that is something you feel might be necessary. return demonstrations are part of supervision interventions. you also want to include interventions that give bob instructions and direction on who to contact for more information if that becomes necessary. you never discharge a person from your care without a line of contact.
everything you list here is a outcome/goal. evaluation is a determination as to whether or not goals and outcomes have been met. i don't see where you have to write goal statements. a goal statement is the exact opposite of a nursing diagnostic statement. both list the evidence (symptoms) that support them. a nursing diagnostic statement has abnormal assessment data as its evidence; a goal statement has normal assessment data as its evidence. so, evaluation of outcomes/goals will include normal assessment data that you expect to find. if you met the outcomes/goals of your interventions, what was once abnormal will now either be totally resolved (gone), improved or stable.
so if your interventions are teaching disease process, review pathology of specific form leukemia and various treatment options then your evaluation is going to be will be able to verbalize what leukemia is, how the disease proceeds and the current treatment for it. these are the positive outcomes/actions/behaviors you expect to occur.
the care plan is a big circle of stuff that is all related to each other. much of it is based up what is found during assessment. that information found during assessment (abnormal data) is then used to develop nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes. it is one big circle of rational decision making.
possible other diagnoses for bob here are (any can be turned into a "risk for" diagnosis):
hello daytonite,
thank you very much for the time and effort you put in to answer my question.
after i read your notes i realized that i didn't read this problem correctly. i thought that bob was diagnosed with leukemia, not his partner, but at this point i think that the partner was diagnosed.
i was very confused about this problem.
it would be my dream to have a mentor like you.
thanks again!
Well, kiddo, unless I get sick, I check this forum first every day for care plans questions.
Great to know that someone willing to help :) Thank you again very very much, I might have some more questions...still working on my refresher course online :)
I received another problem and this is first time I would have to write POC for patient with mental illness. If you just give me some guidance. Your help greatly appreciated.
Steve is a homeless 53 year old schizophrenic. He wanders the streets convinced that the CIA is watching him and trying to take his ‘collection of evidence’ (his paper bag of discarded cups, cans, etc). When he is given medication, sometimes he will take it, if he believes it is for something other than ‘mind control dictated by the CIA’.
Just based on the information in this thread, what should you do first to get started on this?
I just realized that I didn't paste my plan, silly me...here is situation:
Steve is a homeless 53 year old schizophrenic. He wanders the streets convinced that the CIA is watching him and trying to take his 'collection of evidence' (his paper bag of discarded cups, cans, etc). When he is given medication, sometimes he will take it, if he believes it is for something other than 'mind control dictated by the CIA'.
I got this simple nursing plan of care...cold you please check and point me to the right direction:
Problem #1 - Impaired Thought Processes.
Outcome/Goal: Promote appropriate interaction (reality orientation)between client and environment. Enhance physiologic stability/health maintenance,
medication compliance. Provide protection; ensure safety need.
Intervention: Determine severity of client's altered thought processes.
Establish a therapeutic nurse-client relationship. Approach slowly with a non-demanding manner, allow periods of silence. Use therapeutic communications (e.g., reflection, paraphrasing) to intervene effectively.Express desire to understand client's thinking by clarifying what is
unclear, focusing on the feeling rather than the content, endeavoring to
understand (in spite of the client's unclearness), listening carefully, and
regulating the flow of the thinking as needed (Active-listening).
Reinforce congruent thinking. Refuse to argue/agree with disintegrated
thoughts. Present reality and demonstrate motivation to understand client
(model patience). Share appropriate thinking and set limits (cognitive
therapy) if client tries to respond impulsively to altered thinking.
Assess rest/sleep pattern by observing capacity to fall asleep, quality of sleep. Graph sleep chart as indicated until acceptable pattern is
established. Assess presence/degree of factors affecting client's
capacity for diversional activities.
Monitor medication regimen, observing for therapeutic effect and side
effects (e.g., anticholinergic [dry mouth, etc.], sedation, orthostatic
hypotension, photosensitivity, hormonal effects, reduction of seizure
threshold, extrapyramidal symptoms, and fatigue/weakness with sore
throat or signs of infection [agranulocytosis]). Administer medications
as indicated.
Evaluation: Client recognizes changes in thinking/behavior. Client identifies
delusions and increases capacity to cope effectively with them by
reduction of pathological thinking, establishes interpersonal
relationships, maintains reality orientation. Patients maintains treatment
compliance.
Problem #2 Disturbed Sensory Perception- Illusions, delusions, and hallucinations.
Outcome/Goal: Client will identify self in relationship to environment, recognize reality
and dismiss internal voice. Demonstrate improved cognitive, perceptual,
affective and psychomotor abilities.
Intervention: Assess the presence/severity of alterations in client's perceptions. Note
possible causative/contributing factors (e.g., anxiety, substance abuse,
fever, trauma, or other organic illnesses/conditions).
Spend time with client, listening with regard and providing support for
changes client is making. Provide a safe environment by not arguing
with or ridiculing the client. Orient to reality by communicating
effectively (clear, concise); reinforcing reality of client's altered
perceptions; and clarifying time, place, and person. Set limits on
client's impulsive response to altered perceptions. Remain with the
client and provide distraction when possible. Be honest in expressing
fears, especially if potential for violence is perceived.
Evaluation: Client orients to reality; verbalizes absence of hallucination, absence
of paranoid statements and delusions; verbal expressions of trust. Client orients in time, place and person.
Problem #3 Anxiety /Fear - Disintegration of thought processes; delusion that others
want to do him harm. Increased perception of danger; focus on self.
Outcome/Goal: Client will respond appropriately to feelings of anxiety by decreasing
regressive or aggressive behaviors (disintegrated thinking/perception
affect), will verbalize no perceived danger in interactions with others.
Intervention: Note the level of the client's anxiety, considering severity, unfulfilled
needs, misperceptions, present use of defense mechanisms, and coping
skills. Establish trust through a patient, supportive, caring, and accepting
relationship. Encourage the client to verbalize fears. Assist client to
identify/communicate sources of anxiety and areas of concern. Assess
for drug effectiveness/side effects. Demonstrate/encourage use of
effective, constructive strategies for coping with anxiety (e.g., relaxation
and thought-stopping techniques, meditation, physical exercise). Use
role-modeling, positive reinforcement. Remain with the client and clarify
reality. Involve client in planning treatment (participation in treatment
increases client's sense of control and provides opportunity to practice
problem-solving skills). Provide information about shelters, support
group for patients with mental illnesses.
Evaluation: Client responds appropriately to feelings of overwhelming anxiety (fears
of being watched by CIA, loss of control, feelings of rejection) by
decreasing regressive or aggressive behaviors (disintegrated
thinking/perception affect), communicates anxious feelings openly in an
acceptable manner. Orient to reality as evidenced by interpreting milieu
correctly. Verbalize no perceived danger in interactions with others.