Good Samaritan Law

Nurses General Nursing

Published

Recently I came upon a horrific car accident. I did not stop since there were already many people at the scene and I could hear the emergency response vehicles in the distance. I could see that the jaws of life would be needed to get the victims out. I later learned that the passenger died on impact and the driver is in critical condition. Last year I witnessed a car go head first into a ravine at about 60mph. I did stop, along with an off duty paramedic. The 2 men in the car crawled out and were bleeding from many facial cuts. The paramedic instructed them both to lay down and not to move, handed them each a towel to hold pressure on their cuts. He called 911. He never touched either of them.

This recent accident has started a big discussion amongst many nurses I know. Several of them said they do not stop at accidents because the Good Samaritan Law is for non-medical people and that a professional could be held liable if they do something considered negligent. The definition of negligent being whether other nurses would have done the same thing under the same circumstances. For most there seems to be a fear that as a nurse, you might be called upon (at your expense) to defend your actions.

I have researched this law and see that it is different state by state. Here is a summary from Wikipedia:

Good Samaritan laws are laws or acts protecting those who choose to serve and tend to others who are injured or ill. They are intended to reduce bystanders' hesitation to assist, for fear of being sued or prosecuted for unintentional injury or wrongful death. In Canada, a good Samaritan doctrine is a legal principle that prevents a rescuer who has voluntarily helped a victim in distress from being successfully sued for 'wrongdoing'. Its purpose is to keep people from being reluctant to help a stranger in need for fear of legal repercussions should they make some mistake in treatment.[1] Good Samaritan laws vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, as do their interactions with various other legal principles, such as consent, parental rights and the right to refuse treatment. Such laws generally do not apply to medical professionals' or career emergency responders' on-the-job conduct, but some extend protection to professional rescuers when they are acting in a volunteer capacity.

I am a Home Care Nurse and it's been many years since my ER training and experience in Critical Care in a hospital setting. So critical first aid is not my expertise. Has anyone heard of a nurse having to defend her actions after giving emergency care at the scene of an accident? What are your thoughts on this? Do you stop at every accident? If you have a minute, google the Good Samaritan Law in your state and see what it says about off duty professionals. I'd be interested in what other nurses think and how you interpret the law.

Kyasi

Specializes in Emergency/Cath Lab.

This is one of those questions that when asked people can always say they wont stop but what happens when it does happen in front of you? It is like the scenario you face if you are a CCW holder of can you actually pull the trigger to stop an attacker. I dont think anyone really knows what they will do until it happens and so many different things play into the scenario it is difficult to answer

Specializes in Critical Care, Emergency Medicine, Flight.
This is one of those questions that when asked people can always say they wont stop but what happens when it does happen in front of you? It is like the scenario you face if you are a CCW holder of can you actually pull the trigger to stop an attacker. I dont think anyone really knows what they will do until it happens and so many different things play into the scenario it is difficult to answer

I personally think I would stop & help I've done it before, & I'd do it again... Of course take necessary precautions ( no exploding Prius Es) or things like that. If it was a ped v car and there's traffic id probably just call 911 bc I might end up the same way...

Whether its your duty or not to act I think just being there to help someone who needs it (safely) , is the right thing to do. I don't think I'd be able to live with myself of I saw some accident happen & I just passed by it like it was no concern

I stop if it's relatively safe and if there are no emergency vehicles. I've never given my full name, I just tell them I'm a nurse and try to assess the scene and see what I can do.

My grandmother and aunt were in a car wreck about 22 years ago. The other driver and my aunt died at the scene. My grandmother was awake and alert at the scene, then went into cardiac arrest in the ambulance but was resuscitated and lived. It was a bit of time before anyone came upon the accident. The first person who stopped was a nurse, and she attended to my aunt and my grandmother, eventually pulling my aunt out of the vehicle and performing CPR on her after she died. My grandmother and my uncle still regard that woman as an angel. My grandmother was trapped in a vehicle with her dying daughter, on a relatively deserted county road, and this woman stopped, sent her husband to call for help, and did her best to treat them. My grandmother was so scared and in pain, and was just watching her daughter die. She remains grateful she did not have to be alone until the ambulance arrived. She says she doesn't even remember what the woman looked like, just that she had gentle hands and a calm voice, she tried to save my aunt, and that she didn't leave my grandmother alone. So that's why I stop at accidents.

Specializes in Critical Care, Emergency Medicine, Flight.
I stop if it's relatively safe and if there are no emergency vehicles. I've never given my full name, I just tell them I'm a nurse and try to assess the scene and see what I can do.

My grandmother and aunt were in a car wreck about 22 years ago. The other driver and my aunt died at the scene. My grandmother was awake and alert at the scene, then went into cardiac arrest in the ambulance but was resuscitated and lived. It was a bit of time before anyone came upon the accident. The first person who stopped was a nurse, and she attended to my aunt and my grandmother, eventually pulling my aunt out of the vehicle and performing CPR on her after she died. My grandmother and my uncle still regard that woman as an angel. My grandmother was trapped in a vehicle with her dying daughter, on a relatively deserted county road, and this woman stopped, sent her husband to call for help, and did her best to treat them. My grandmother was so scared and in pain, and was just watching her daughter die. She remains grateful she did not have to be alone until the ambulance arrived. She says she doesn't even remember what the woman looked like, just that she had gentle hands and a calm voice, she tried to save my aunt, and that she didn't leave my grandmother alone. So that's why I stop at accidents.

This seriously gave me chills!

Reviving an old thread. I though this article was interesting as it focuses on the laws of each of the states. The sad part of this is that the US legal system has really ruined it for every Good Samaritan. In my state you can be sued if you acted with gross negligence. This is the crux of the problem. Even if you did everything right, my non-lawyer interpretation is that the victim's family or the victim you helped can still sue you claiming gross negligence to bypass the protections and you will probably spend thousands of dollars defending yourself to prove your innocence. Therefore, that is why many people I have spoken with will no longer stop to render aid. If anyone is a lawyer here and can post proof to the contrary such as case law, I would be interested to read it. What really constitutes gross negligence and does the plaintiff need to prove anything before filing the case against a good Samaritan?

Good Samaritan Laws by state | Recreation Law

+ Add a Comment