Colorado ALTO (alternative to opioids) program
Last year the Colorado Hospital Association pioneered the ALTO program (alternatives to opioids). Ten hospital emergency departments across the state participated and decreased the use of narcotics from 31-46% (CHA, 2018)!
The ALTO program (alternatives to opioids) in the ED.
Last year the Colorado Hospital Association (CHA) pioneered the ALTO program. Ten hospital emergency departments across the state participated and decreased the use of narcotics from 31-46% (CHA, 2018)!
Colorado, as well as the US, is in the grips of an opioid epidemic, as I'm sure you are aware. We have the 12th highest rate of abuse of prescription opioids in the US (CHA, 2017). According to the CHA (2017), "the vast majority of those who become addicted to opioids, both prescription and illicit, received their first dose from a doctor". This effort is to reduce the unnecessary use of opioids, and thus one of the pathways to abuse and addiction.
The key to the program was creating treatment algorithms based on pain pathways. The idea that all pain can and should be treated with narcotics is not true. All pain is not created equal. So the Colorado ACEP (American College of Emergency Physicians) developed Opioid Prescribing and Treatment Guidelines. (This can be found on the CHA web site.) This method treats pain by targeting the pathway that causes it. They identified the following;
· Headache/ Migraine
· Muscoskeletal Pain
· Renal Colic
· Chronic Abdominal Pain
· Extremity Fracture/ Joint Dislocation
For each source of pain, they prescribe a set of drugs or treatments, always starting with non-narcotics, progressing to opioids as the last resort. As previously stated, a major reduction in opioid use resulted, with no reduction in patient satisfaction scores!
The medications that are used are familiar to us, but not necessarily as pain medication. Topical as well as IV lidocaine, low dose Ketamine, Toradol, Tylenol, nitrous oxide, Haldol, Benadryl, and a number of antiemetics were all used with good results. Trigger point injection is also an intervention, in which lidocaine is injected directly into a nerve bundle, or muscle fascia. It can relieve muscle tension and spasm, and works well for the release of scalp tension headaches and other muscle pain.
As a nurse who was involved in the pilot, I can tell you this works. Not only are patients looking for alternatives, but we are providing better care with less risk. Patient satisfaction scores did not go down overall. Hopefully as providers get more experienced in using these protocols, satisfaction will go up.
Preparing a hospital for the ALTO program is a huge project. Pharmacy, purchasing, IT, and physicians and nurses all have to be on the same page. New standing orders needed to be written, new order sets generated, new dosing guideline for smart pumps, and new products, such as lidocaine patches had to be ordered.
The Colorado ENA (Emergency Nurses Association) provided nursing education that included scripting in how to explain the program to patients. Nurses explained that we are looking to make patients more comfortable, or reduce their pain. Complete pain relief is not always a realistic goal, as we know. It is also realistic to discuss with patients the risks of narcotics, and the risk of abuse and dangers of having narcotics in the home.
It will be exciting to see how far we can go. There were many lessons learned that will only serve to improve this model and how it is delivered.
CHA (2018), Colorado Hospital Association, Colorado Opioid Safety Pilot Results Report, retrieved from Opioid Safety | Colorado Hospital Association
CHA (2017), Colorado Hospital Association, Colorado Opioid Safety CollaborativeLast edit by Joe V on Jun 14 : Reason: images missing
The author entered EMS more than 20 years ago and became a nurse in 2005. He works as an ED nurse, educator, and flight nurse.
Joined: Jun '07; Posts: 2,124; Likes: 3,079
RN, paramedic; from US
Specialty: ER, ICUFeb 27The COACEP document contains great information and is worth reading and appears to be one of the main sources of information from which CHA developed their pilot.
According to the CHA (2017), "the vast majority of those who become addicted to opioids, both prescription and illicit, received their first dose from a doctor".
I work/have worked with too many physicians who I believe truly feel "between a rock and a hard place" - - we need to stop this vilifying of physicians right along with improving the way we treat patients. JCAHO/TJC/JC, IOM, plenty of other entities, patients, hospitals (and their associations), drug companies, physicians, and nurses are "responsible." The end. Time to move forward.
Anyway, not so much a fan of hospitals and their associations (they're the same ones who will be lobbying against things like safe staffing and other issues directly important to nurses and patients, BTW)...but the COACEP document includes useful information.
Thanks for posting!
Colorado Chapter, American College of Emergency Physicians. (2017). 2017 Opioid prescribing & treatment guidelines: Confronting the opioid epidemic in Colorado's emergency departments. (D.E. Stader, III, Ed.). Retrieved from http://coacep.org/docs/COACEP_Opioid...ines-Final.pdfLast edit by JKL33 on Feb 27Mar 1Hi everybody. I've been an ER Nurse for a long time & I think these guidelines are great. However, from what I seen there are a couple bad-smelling 600 pound Gorillas in the room that nobody wants to deal with. First, our ER is often clogged with obvious drug seeking patients. Often these patients are chronic pain patients who have been on meds for years and for a myriad of reasons (used all there meds, don't think they get enough meds from following physician. have switched to heroin because its dirt cheap and they can sell their meds for cash,,,) seeking treatment for a new pain complaint or some exacerbation of existing pain. In there defense we made these patients what they are. The standard for treating such pain for a very long time was opioids and to battle the effects of tolerance ever increasing doses of the same. Of course the result of this treatment plan is addiction. In short, they are a bunch of poor addicted souls who got started down this road by simply listening to their doctors advice. Anyway I've seen no good answer on what to do with these addicted patients. In my state we have taken some measures that have helped like limiting the amount of opioids that an ER physician but this has simply led to a ER hopping scenario for the patient. The second Gorilla is Doctor fear. Most of my docs are terrified of being accused of not treating a patient's pain and low patient satisfaction scores. Of course the hospital wants to eat its cake and keep it to. So if a doc does the right thing and refuses to write for such a patient and the patient complains the doc gets BBQ'd. What do we do about this? Honestly some solutions seem available. Continue to strictly limit the amount of pain meds ER docs can write. Consider a 30 day limit in addition to the present limit to prevent these patients from simply returning to the ER daily. Network all local ERs to show the patients that hop from ER to ER to keep the supply of pills flowing. Finally, stand by the docs that refuse to be a pez dispenser with MD behind their names.Mar 25'But the simple reality is this: According to the large, annually repeated and representative National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 75 percent of all opioid misuse starts with people using medication that wasn't prescribed for them-obtained from a friend, family member or dealer. '
Oh the hyperbole: "gripped in a crisis" etc...since part one was such a stunning failure in reducing anything except the number of prison inmates, we have launched 'The War on drugs' part two. '
Just as was the case in the 1980s when inner city black people were tossed in jail for crack cocaine while wealthy white addicts snorted cocaine off of the discotheque tables we have another self-proclaimed crisis because, oh my God, there are white middle/upper class kids using heroin; we even renamed it opiate-use disorder just for white people!
Isn't that special? I don't see anything about current inner city kids and you can bet rehabs are not popping up in Watts, Inglewood and Compton.
Same thing different generation and 35 years later we still have a stunning state of apathy as to what happens in the ghetto. Statistics can be tweaked any way one wishes and diverting prescription drugs should not place an addict in the 'doctor-prescribed' category.
And the DEA, signed into law by Nixon to aid law enforcement, needed a fresh infusion of money. Having not made a dent in meth and cocaine they love this new war! Doctors don't shoot back and have assets to seize. They still have marijuana growers but generally don't catch them, they just catch their crops (remember marijuana is a schedule one drug; highest level of addiction and no medical use.) I am amazed that opiate stats put out by the same entity which has marijuana categorized such is believed as 'factual' when it comes to opiates.
And we still have the same gateway drug; alcohol. Can't drive anywhere without seeing a billboard for booze, same with reading a magazine or watching TV, we are saturated with alcohol ads. When am I going to hear "this unfortunate youngster was a victim of Anheuser Busch"? Given we have a president who wants the death penalty for drug dealers I foresee a repeat of the 1980s with the only end result being an increase in the number of prison inmates while white suburbia continues to play the blame game and say the bad Rx stolen from grandmas medicine cabinet. Never-mind that they just committed a felony, we don't keep those jail beds open for wealthy white kids.
History repeating itself and anyone who thinks that a batch of shiny, new government regulations is going to change anything is a bit naive. Their will always be those who want to alter their mood and 10 years from now we will have them doing it with something different while the inner city kids who were busted are sitting in prison.
Must Read Topics